Cyprus - Second DivisionData current as of 07 September 2026

Nea Salamis vs MEAP Nisou: match statistics

Nea Salamis crest
Nea Salamis
1 : 0half-time 1:0
MEAP Nisou crest
MEAP Nisou
170%(1.28)
X20%(5.10)
210%(8.90)

Nea Salamis is displaying dominant form as the league leaders with an impressive record of 13 wins, 2 draws, and no losses this season. The hosts win 71% of their home matches, keeping clean sheets at the same rate, while averaging just 0.29 goals conceded per game. MEAP Nisou occupies a distant 7th place with a 6-3-6 record and defensive issues, conceding an average of 1.57 goals away. The quality gap between the teams is vast – Nea Salamis boasts a positive goal difference of +8 at home, while the visitors have a negative -2 away. Recent form confirms the hosts' superiority: 4 wins and 1 draw in their last 5 matches, whereas MEAP Nisou has averaged only 1.4 points per match in this period. All indicators, including higher xG (2.06 vs 1.83), better efficiency and ball possession (60% vs 55%), clearly point to a certain Nea Salamis victory.

Nea Salamis vs MEAP Nisou: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Nea Salamis played MEAP Nisou in Second Division (Cyprus). The match was played on 18 January 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Nea Salamis: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. MEAP Nisou: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Nea Salamis scores 1.80 and concedes 0.33 goals per match. MEAP Nisou scores 1.20 and concedes 1.80. League average: 2.54 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Nea Salamis 27%, MEAP Nisou 53%. Over 2.5: Nea Salamis 33%, MEAP Nisou 53%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

Nea Salamis has higher xG: 2.01 vs 1.66. Nea Salamis: 13.4 shots per match, MEAP Nisou: 9.5.

Match halves

Nea Salamis: half-time lead 53%, second-half goals 0.93. MEAP Nisou: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.47.

Goals by minute

Nea Salamis: 76-90+ (9 goals). MEAP Nisou: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 2.54 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Nea Salamis is displaying dominant form as the league leaders with an impressive record of 13 wins, 2 draws, and no losses this season. The hosts win 71% of their home matches, keeping clean sheets at the same rate, while averaging just 0.29 goals conceded per game. MEAP Nisou occupies a distant 7th place with a 6-3-6 record and defensive issues, conceding an average of 1.57 goals away. The quality gap between the teams is vast – Nea Salamis boasts a positive goal difference of +8 at home, while the visitors have a negative -2 away. Recent form confirms the hosts' superiority: 4 wins and 1 draw in their last 5 matches, whereas MEAP Nisou has averaged only 1.4 points per match in this period. All indicators, including higher xG (2.06 vs 1.83), better efficiency and ball possession (60% vs 55%), clearly point to a certain Nea Salamis victory.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
11Shots5
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
9Shots on target3
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
1.81xG0.86
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
2Corners0
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
67Dangerous attacks45
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
25Fouls17
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
0Cards0
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
1.8Goals scored / match1.2
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
0.33Goals conceded / match1.8
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
47%Average possession46%
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
4.8Shots on target / match3.6
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.4Shots per match9.47
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
4.8Shots on target3.6
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
13.4%Shot conversion12.7%
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
47%Possession46%
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
2.01xG for1.66
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
0.91xG against1.5
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou

Shooting quality

Nea Salamis: Counter-attackingMEAP Nisou: Counter-attacking
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
Accuracy (shots on target)36%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.18
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Nea Salamis is 86% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - Nea Salamis · 1.4 pts / match - MEAP Nisou

Nea Salamis
WDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
87% W13% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-2-0
2.73 pts / match · goal difference +22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-2-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.0xG: 1.88Opponent xG: 0.93BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
MEAP Nisou
WLDWL
Season result split
40% W20% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-6
1.40 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-1
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WDWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.59Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nea Salamis is 50% better for: goals scored per match.

1.8 goals / match - Nea Salamis · 1.2 goals / match - MEAP Nisou

Nea Salamis is 445% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.33 goals / match - Nea Salamis · 1.8 goals / match - MEAP Nisou

Nea Salamis scoring profile: very strong

Nea Salamis scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while MEAP Nisou keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).

MEAP Nisou scoring profile: mixed

MEAP Nisou scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while Nea Salamis keeps a clean sheet in 73% (11 of 15 matches).

27Goals scored (season)18
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
5Goals conceded (season)27
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
2.13Average goals in match3
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
8Goals scored (last 5)4
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
0Goals conceded (last 5)9
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou

How often they score at least...

87%1 goal73%
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
67%2 goals27%
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
20%3 goals13%
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
7%4 goals7%
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou

How often they concede at least...

27%1 goal73%
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
7%2 goals47%
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
0%3 goals27%
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
0%4 goals13%
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

47%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time33%
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
7%BTTS in both halves0%
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
53%Scored in both halves20%
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou

BTTS and goal count

27%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
0%BTTS - last 520%
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time60%
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
27%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nea Salamis is 72% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.07 pts / match - Nea Salamis · 1.2 pts / match - MEAP Nisou

Nea Salamis - half-time state
53% leading47% draw0% trailing
MEAP Nisou - half-time state
27% leading40% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.07Points per match (1st half)1.2
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
0.87Goals scored (1st half)0.73
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
0.2Goals conceded (1st half)1
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
1.07Average goals (1st half)1.73
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
80%Clean sheet before half-time40%
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
33%No goal before half-time47%
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou

After half-time (2nd half)

2.33Points per match (2nd half)1.13
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
0.93Goals scored (2nd half)0.47
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
0.13Goals conceded (2nd half)0.8
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
1.07Average goals (2nd half)1.27
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
87%Clean sheet after half-time53%
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou
27%No goal after half-time60%
Nea SalamisMEAP Nisou

Nea Salamis - second-half results

67% W33% R0% P
31
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding164%

Leads at half-time in 53% of matches and wins 87%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

MEAP Nisou - second-half results

27% W33% R40% P
18
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding148%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Nea Salamis - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.20
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.80.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+4+4
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
MEAP Nisou - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.60
Goals scored / match0.80.0
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.80.8
1 goal80%40%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%100%
Goal difference-1-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Nea Salamis
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
5
1
16-30
5
1
31-45
2
0
46-60
3
2
61-75
9
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

MEAP Nisou
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
3
4
16-30
6
9
31-45
1
2
46-60
2
4
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.56
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+95%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Nea Salamis

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.37
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.58
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
145%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
25%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

MEAP Nisou

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.76
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+7.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
145%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

Nea SalamisLigaMEAP Nisou
Average goals in match 2.132.54 3.00
Both teams scored 27%47% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%44% 53%
Clean sheets 73%30% 27%
Goal before half-time 67%70% 80%
Goal after half-time 73%77% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.54
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.24
Home goals / match
1.30
Away goals / match
+-5%
Home attack advantage
+-5%
Home defence advantage
+-8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Konstantinos Anthimou⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Nea SalamisGoalKonstantinos Anthimou

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Nea Salamis 1 - 0 - 0 MEAP Nisou. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

MEAP Nisou
1 : 4
Nea Salamis

FAQ

What was the result of Nea Salamis vs MEAP Nisou?

The Second Division match finished Nea Salamis 1:0 MEAP Nisou. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Nea Salamis vs MEAP Nisou?

Nea Salamis score 1.80 goals per game on average and MEAP Nisou 1.20. The Second Division average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 27% of Nea Salamis's matches and 53% of MEAP Nisou's.

What form are Nea Salamis and MEAP Nisou in?

Over the last 5 games Nea Salamis have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and MEAP Nisou 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nea Salamis vs MEAP Nisou?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Nea Salamis vs MEAP Nisou: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.