Cyprus - Second DivisionData current as of 13 September 2026

Nea Salamis vs Omonia 29is Maiou: match statistics

155%(1.59)
X27%(3.65)
218%(5.20)

Nea Salamis is displaying impressive home form with a 78% win rate at their venue and just 6 goals conceded throughout the entire season on home soil. The hosts are the league leaders with a 16-2-0 record and an impressive series of 67% clean sheets in home matches. Omonia 29is Maiou, despite solid away form (56% wins), falls short of the hosts in key statistics – lower xG efficiency (1.77 vs 2.11) and a higher number of goals conceded on the road. Nea Salamis's advantage in ball possession (59% vs 57%) and higher chance conversion rate point to their dominance. Considering the hosts' unbeaten run in their last 5 matches (2.6 PPG) and their statistical edge in the head-to-head matchup, the most probable outcome is a Nea Salamis victory, although the visitors' solid form does not rule out a draw.

Nea Salamis vs Omonia 29is Maiou: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Nea Salamis played Omonia 29is Maiou in Second Division (Cyprus). The match was played on 7 February 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Nea Salamis: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Omonia 29is Maiou: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Nea Salamis scores 1.89 and concedes 0.33 goals per match. Omonia 29is Maiou scores 2.00 and concedes 1.06. League average: 2.62 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Nea Salamis 28%, Omonia 29is Maiou 56%. Over 2.5: Nea Salamis 33%, Omonia 29is Maiou 56%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 45%.

xG, shots and style

Nea Salamis has higher xG: 2.01 vs 1.75. Nea Salamis: 13.7 shots per match, Omonia 29is Maiou: 9.7.

Match halves

Nea Salamis: half-time lead 61%, second-half goals 0.83. Omonia 29is Maiou: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 1.06.

Goals by minute

Nea Salamis: 76-90+ (10 goals). Omonia 29is Maiou: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 2.62 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 45%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Nea Salamis is displaying impressive home form with a 78% win rate at their venue and just 6 goals conceded throughout the entire season on home soil. The hosts are the league leaders with a 16-2-0 record and an impressive series of 67% clean sheets in home matches. Omonia 29is Maiou, despite solid away form (56% wins), falls short of the hosts in key statistics – lower xG efficiency (1.77 vs 2.11) and a higher number of goals conceded on the road. Nea Salamis's advantage in ball possession (59% vs 57%) and higher chance conversion rate point to their dominance. Considering the hosts' unbeaten run in their last 5 matches (2.6 PPG) and their statistical edge in the head-to-head matchup, the most probable outcome is a Nea Salamis victory, although the visitors' solid form does not rule out a draw.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

40Possession (%)60
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
3Shots3
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
2Shots on target2
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
0.68xG0.82
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
2Corners4
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
48Dangerous attacks67
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
15Fouls17
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
0Cards0
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
1.89Goals scored / match2
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
0.33Goals conceded / match1.06
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
48%Average possession41%
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
5.44Shots on target / match3.78
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.72Shots per match9.72
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
5.44Shots on target3.78
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
13.8%Shot conversion20.6%
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
48%Possession41%
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
2.01xG for1.75
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
0.94xG against0.98
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou

Shooting quality

Nea Salamis: Efficient finishingOmonia 29is Maiou: Counter-attacking
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
Accuracy (shots on target)40%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.18
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.53

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Nea Salamis is 36% better for: last-5 form.

3 pts / match - Nea Salamis · 2.2 pts / match - Omonia 29is Maiou

Nea Salamis
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
89% W11% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
16-2-0
2.78 pts / match · goal difference +28
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-2-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WDWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.86Opponent xG: 0.88BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Omonia 29is Maiou
WWDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
44% W39% D17% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-7-3
1.72 pts / match · goal difference +17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-3-1
Last 5 away
2-3-0
DWDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 2.45Opponent xG: 0.89BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Omonia 29is Maiou is 6% better for: goals scored per match.

1.89 goals / match - Nea Salamis · 2 goals / match - Omonia 29is Maiou

Nea Salamis is 221% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.33 goals / match - Nea Salamis · 1.06 goals / match - Omonia 29is Maiou

Nea Salamis scoring profile: very strong

Nea Salamis scores in 89% of matches (16 of 18 matches), while Omonia 29is Maiou keeps a clean sheet in 39% (7 of 18 matches).

Omonia 29is Maiou scoring profile: mixed

Omonia 29is Maiou scores in 83% of matches (15 of 18 matches), while Nea Salamis keeps a clean sheet in 72% (13 of 18 matches).

34Goals scored (season)36
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
6Goals conceded (season)19
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
2.22Average goals in match3.06
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
11Goals scored (last 5)18
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
1Goals conceded (last 5)4
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou

How often they score at least...

89%1 goal83%
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
67%2 goals44%
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
22%3 goals33%
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
11%4 goals17%
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou

How often they concede at least...

28%1 goal61%
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
6%2 goals33%
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
0%3 goals11%
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
0%4 goals0%
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
Omonia 29is Maiou - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 18 matches
49%
League average

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time22%
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
6%BTTS in both halves17%
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
50%Scored in both halves33%
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou

BTTS and goal count

28%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS22%
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
20%BTTS - last 560%
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

72%Min. 1 goal before half-time72%
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
28%Min. 2 goals before half-time39%
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time22%
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time89%
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
22%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time28%
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nea Salamis is 42% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.22 pts / match - Nea Salamis · 1.56 pts / match - Omonia 29is Maiou

Nea Salamis - half-time state
61% leading39% draw0% trailing
Omonia 29is Maiou - half-time state
39% leading39% draw22% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.22Points per match (1st half)1.56
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
1.06Goals scored (1st half)0.94
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
0.22Goals conceded (1st half)0.44
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
1.28Average goals (1st half)1.39
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
78%Clean sheet before half-time56%
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
28%No goal before half-time50%
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou

After half-time (2nd half)

2.22Points per match (2nd half)1.72
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
0.83Goals scored (2nd half)1.06
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
0.11Goals conceded (2nd half)0.61
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
0.94Average goals (2nd half)1.67
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
89%Clean sheet after half-time56%
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou
33%No goal after half-time33%
Nea SalamisOmonia 29is Maiou

Nea Salamis - second-half results

61% W39% D0% L
40
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+15
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.22
PPG before half-time
Lead holding146%

Leads at half-time in 61% of matches and wins 89%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Omonia 29is Maiou - second-half results

50% W22% D28% L
28
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding113%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Nea Salamis - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.001.80
Goals scored / match1.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.0
Average goals in match2.00.4
1 goal100%40%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal0%60%
Goal difference+8+2
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 9
Omonia 29is Maiou - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.401.80
Goals scored / match2.01.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match2.42.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals60%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+8+6
Half-time: 80% leading - 0% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 10

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Nea Salamis
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
9
2
16-30
6
1
31-45
2
0
46-60
3
2
61-75
10
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.

Omonia 29is Maiou
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
5
3
16-30
10
3
31-45
6
2
46-60
7
2
61-75
6
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.64
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
42%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+89%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
74%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Nea Salamis

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.49
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.61
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
144%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
25%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Omonia 29is Maiou

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.77
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
153%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.48
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

Nea SalamisLigaOmonia 29is Maiou
Average goals in match 2.222.62 3.06
Both teams scored 28%49% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%45% 56%
Clean sheets 72%29% 39%
Goal before half-time 72%72% 72%
Goal after half-time 67%78% 89%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.62
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.31
Home goals / match
1.31
Away goals / match
+0%
Home attack advantage
+0%
Home defence advantage
+-4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Panagiotis Louka⚽ 1
Panayiotis Artymatas⚽ 1

Away team

Other recorded players

Reda Kharchouch⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Nea SalamisGoalPanayiotis Artymatas
  2. Nea SalamisGoalPanagiotis Louka
  3. Omonia 29is MaiouGoalReda Kharchouch

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Nea Salamis 1 - 0 - 0 Omonia 29is Maiou. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Nea Salamis vs Omonia 29is Maiou?

The Second Division match finished Nea Salamis 2:1 Omonia 29is Maiou. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Nea Salamis vs Omonia 29is Maiou?

Nea Salamis score 1.89 goals per game on average and Omonia 29is Maiou 2.00. The Second Division average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 28% of Nea Salamis's matches and 56% of Omonia 29is Maiou's.

What form are Nea Salamis and Omonia 29is Maiou in?

Over the last 5 games Nea Salamis have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Omonia 29is Maiou 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nea Salamis vs Omonia 29is Maiou?

The statistical background for Nea Salamis vs Omonia 29is Maiou — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.