Nea Salamis vs PAEEK: match statistics
Nea Salamis vs PAEEK: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Nea Salamis played PAEEK in Second Division (Cyprus). The match was played on 28 November 2025. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Nea Salamis: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match. PAEEK: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Nea Salamis scores 1.89 and concedes 0.44 goals per match. PAEEK scores 1.22 and concedes 0.44. League average: 2.62 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Nea Salamis 33%, PAEEK 33%. Over 2.5: Nea Salamis 44%, PAEEK 22%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 48%.
xG, shots and style
Nea Salamis has higher xG: 2.18 vs 1.31. Nea Salamis: 13.8 shots per match, PAEEK: 8.1.
Match halves
Nea Salamis: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 1.00. PAEEK: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.78.
Goals by minute
Nea Salamis: 76-90+ (6 goals). PAEEK: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second Division: 2.62 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 48%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Nea Salamis | PAEEK | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 49% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Nea Salamis is 275% better for: last-5 form.
3 pts / match - Nea Salamis · 0.8 pts / match - PAEEK
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Nea Salamis is 55% better for: goals scored per match.
1.89 goals / match - Nea Salamis · 1.22 goals / match - PAEEK
Nea Salamis scores in 89% of matches (8 of 9 matches), while PAEEK keeps a clean sheet in 67% (6 of 9 matches).
PAEEK scores in 67% of matches (6 of 9 matches), while Nea Salamis keeps a clean sheet in 67% (6 of 9 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Nea Salamis
Over / Under - PAEEK
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Nea Salamis is 42% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.89 pts / match - Nea Salamis · 1.33 pts / match - PAEEK
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Nea Salamis - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 89%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
PAEEK - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Nea Salamis
PAEEK
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Nea Salamis | Liga | PAEEK | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.33 | 2.62 | ▼ 1.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 52% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 48% | ▼ 22% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 67% | 27% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 70% | ▼ 44% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 78% | 82% | ▼ 56% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Nea SalamisGoalKonstantinos Elia
- PAEEKGoalMarko Dobrijević
FAQ
What was the result of Nea Salamis vs PAEEK?
The Second Division match finished Nea Salamis 2:1 PAEEK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Nea Salamis vs PAEEK?
Nea Salamis score 1.89 goals per game on average and PAEEK 1.22. The Second Division average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Nea Salamis's matches and 33% of PAEEK's.
What form are Nea Salamis and PAEEK in?
Over the last 5 games Nea Salamis have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and PAEEK 0-4-1 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nea Salamis vs PAEEK?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Nea Salamis vs PAEEK: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.