Netherlands - EredivisieData current as of 11 September 2026

NEC vs Feyenoord: match statistics

NEC crest
NEC
1 : 1half-time 0:1
Feyenoord crest
Feyenoord

NEC vs Feyenoord: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

NEC played Feyenoord in Eredivisie (Netherlands). The match was played on 12 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

NEC: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Feyenoord: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

NEC scores 2.45 and concedes 1.62 goals per match. Feyenoord scores 2.10 and concedes 1.38. League average: 3.17 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: NEC 79%, Feyenoord 59%. Over 2.5: NEC 79%, Feyenoord 62%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 62%.

xG, shots and style

Feyenoord has higher xG: 1.95 vs 1.92. NEC: 16.3 shots per match, Feyenoord: 17.1.

Match halves

NEC: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 1.52. Feyenoord: half-time lead 48%, second-half goals 1.10.

Goals by minute

NEC: 46-60 (15 goals). Feyenoord: 31-45+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Eredivisie: 3.17 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 62%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back a home win: NEC averages 2.64 goals per home match with an average xG of 1.96, while Feyenoord averages 1.86 goals and xG 1.69 away. Form favors NEC — last 5 matches: 4 wins and 1 draw (avg 2.6 points) and 13 goals scored, versus Feyenoord’s 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss (avg 1.2 points) and only 6 goals. NEC creates more chances at home: 17.07 shots and 6.5 on target per match versus Feyenoord’s 14.5 shots and 5.21 on target, with conversion rates of 15% vs 13%. Defensively the gap is marginal — Feyenoord concedes 1.36 goals away vs NEC’s 1.57 conceded at home, and clean sheet ratio is 36% for Feyenoord and 29% for NEC. Considering NEC’s clear offensive edge at home and the fact that NEC have not recorded a match without scoring at home (0%), I estimate probabilities as: home win 60%, draw 25%, Feyenoord win 15%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The 'BTTS - Yes' scenario appears more likely because NEC has a seasonal BTTS rate of 73% and records only 27% clean sheets at home, while Feyenoord has a seasonal BTTS of 43%. xG analysis further shows NEC generates 2.20 xG per match versus average xG conceded to Feyenoord of 1.32; Feyenoord has 1.69 xG while average xG conceded to NEC is 1.16, indicating both sides can create scoring chances. In the last 5 matches BTTS occurred in 60% of meetings, the league has a seasonal BTTS level of 63% and an average of 3.19 goals per match, so the competition environment favors both teams scoring. Defensive data also supports goals from both sides: NEC concedes 1.4 goals per match on average, Feyenoord 1.36, and NEC averages 7.47 shots on target versus Feyenoord’s 5.21, increasing the likelihood of goals. Based on this, I recommend 'Yes' at 68% probability and 'No' at 32% as the most consistent signal from the provided numbers.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The model predicts 1.76 xG for NEC and 1.43 xG for Feyenoord, totalling 3.19 goals. Season shares of matches over 1.5 goals are NEC 87% and Feyenoord 79% (average 83%), and NEC has averaged 2.6 goals in the last 5 matches, which is a strong signal for Over 1.5. The 2.5 line also has support – season Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 64% (average 62%) and the combined xG of 3.19 is clearly above 2.5. Over 3.5 looks weaker: season Over 3.5 rates are 47% and 36% (average ~42%), and the expected total of 3.19 is below 3.5, therefore the best and strongest signal from the data is to play Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

NEC has strong starts and form: in their last 5 home matches they led at the break in 60% of cases (3 of 5) and averaged 1.4 goals by half-time, whereas Feyenoord averaged 0.4 goals by half-time in their last 5 matches. The form gap is considerable — NEC won 80% of their last 5 matches (4 of 5), and Feyenoord only 20% (1 of 5), which increases the likelihood of maintaining the lead. NEC generates more high-quality chances: xG 2.2 versus 1.69 for Feyenoord and on average 7.47 shots on target versus 5.21, a clear advantage in chance creation. Additionally, NEC concedes only 0.47 goals in the first half compared to 0.86 for Feyenoord, and the average second-half goals in home matches is 2.27, suggesting that a lead at the break is often maintained or extended after the interval. Due to the season-long BTTS tendency for the hosts (73% of NEC games see both teams score) I attribute some probability to scenarios with opposition goals, but the strongest data signal points to 1/1 (Half-Time/Full-Time).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
NECFeyenoord
15Shots13
NECFeyenoord
4Shots on target5
NECFeyenoord
1.66xG1.43
NECFeyenoord
4Corners1
NECFeyenoord
60Dangerous attacks35
NECFeyenoord
17Fouls14
NECFeyenoord
3Cards4
NECFeyenoord

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.45Goals scored / match2.1
NECFeyenoord
1.62Goals conceded / match1.38
NECFeyenoord
56%Average possession54%
NECFeyenoord
6.76Shots on target / match6.38
NECFeyenoord

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

16.34Shots per match17.1
NECFeyenoord
6.76Shots on target6.38
NECFeyenoord
15%Shot conversion12.3%
NECFeyenoord
56%Possession54%
NECFeyenoord
1.92xG for1.95
NECFeyenoord
1.31xG against1.24
NECFeyenoord

Shooting quality

NEC: DominantFeyenoord: Attacking
NECFeyenoord
Accuracy (shots on target)41%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

NEC is 67% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - NEC · 1.2 pts / match - Feyenoord

NEC
LWWDW
Season result split
52% W28% D21% L
Season (W-D-L)
15-8-6
1.83 pts / match · goal difference +24
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-3-3
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 2.19Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Feyenoord
LDWDD
Season result split
55% W21% D24% L
Season (W-D-L)
16-6-7
1.86 pts / match · goal difference +21
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-4-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LWLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.67Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

NEC is 17% better for: goals scored per match.

2.45 goals / match - NEC · 2.1 goals / match - Feyenoord

Feyenoord is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.62 goals / match - NEC · 1.38 goals / match - Feyenoord

NEC scoring profile: very strong

NEC scores in 97% of matches (28 of 29 matches), while Feyenoord keeps a clean sheet in 31% (9 of 29 matches).

Feyenoord scoring profile: very strong

Feyenoord scores in 86% of matches (25 of 29 matches), while NEC keeps a clean sheet in 17% (5 of 29 matches).

71Goals scored (season)61
NECFeyenoord
47Goals conceded (season)40
NECFeyenoord
4.07Average goals in match3.48
NECFeyenoord
12Goals scored (last 5)6
NECFeyenoord
7Goals conceded (last 5)7
NECFeyenoord

How often they score at least...

97%1 goal86%
NECFeyenoord
83%2 goals62%
NECFeyenoord
45%3 goals31%
NECFeyenoord
17%4 goals14%
NECFeyenoord

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal69%
NECFeyenoord
48%2 goals41%
NECFeyenoord
24%3 goals21%
NECFeyenoord
3%4 goals7%
NECFeyenoord

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

52%BTTS at half-time24%
NECFeyenoord
31%BTTS in both halves10%
NECFeyenoord
72%Scored in both halves41%
NECFeyenoord

BTTS and goal count

69%Min. 3 goals and BTTS52%
NECFeyenoord
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
NECFeyenoord
60%BTTS - last 560%
NECFeyenoord

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

93%Min. 1 goal before half-time86%
NECFeyenoord
59%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
NECFeyenoord
28%Min. 3 goals before half-time28%
NECFeyenoord

2nd half

97%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
NECFeyenoord
72%Min. 2 goals after half-time48%
NECFeyenoord
31%Min. 3 goals after half-time31%
NECFeyenoord

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Feyenoord is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.45 pts / match - NEC · 1.66 pts / match - Feyenoord

NEC - half-time state
38% leading31% draw31% trailing
Feyenoord - half-time state
48% leading21% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.45Points per match (1st half)1.66
NECFeyenoord
0.93Goals scored (1st half)1
NECFeyenoord
0.9Goals conceded (1st half)0.66
NECFeyenoord
1.83Average goals (1st half)1.66
NECFeyenoord
31%Clean sheet before half-time48%
NECFeyenoord
24%No goal before half-time41%
NECFeyenoord

After half-time (2nd half)

1.9Points per match (2nd half)1.62
NECFeyenoord
1.52Goals scored (2nd half)1.1
NECFeyenoord
0.72Goals conceded (2nd half)0.72
NECFeyenoord
2.24Average goals (2nd half)1.83
NECFeyenoord
45%Clean sheet after half-time52%
NECFeyenoord
7%No goal after half-time31%
NECFeyenoord

NEC - second-half results

48% W45% D7% L
42
Half-time points
27
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
55
Second-half points
+23
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.45
PPG before half-time
Lead holding137%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Feyenoord - second-half results

38% W48% D14% L
48
Half-time points
29
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
47
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.66
PPG before half-time
Lead holding115%

Leads at half-time in 48% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

NEC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.00
Goals scored / match1.21.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match2.01.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal0%0%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 6
Feyenoord - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.60
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-3+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

NEC
ScoredConceded
8
5
0-15
9
6
16-30
10
15
31-45
15
9
46-60
14
6
61-75
15
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (15 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

Feyenoord
ScoredConceded
4
6
0-15
12
7
16-30
13
6
31-45
13
7
46-60
6
3
61-75
13
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.78
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
119%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
69%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+59%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
83%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

NEC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.61
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.53
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
137%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
117%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Feyenoord

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.71
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
151%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.66
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eredivisie).

Teams vs league

NECLigaFeyenoord
Average goals in match 4.073.17 3.48
Both teams scored 79%63% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 79%62% 62%
Clean sheets 17%20% 31%
Goal before half-time 93%81% 86%
Goal after half-time 97%84% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.17
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.79
Home goals / match
1.39
Away goals / match
+29%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
54%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FeyenoordGoalAyase UedaAssist: Anis Hadj Moussa
  2. FeyenoordYellow cardLuciano Valente
  3. FeyenoordYellow cardTimon Janis Wellenreuther
  4. NECYellow cardPhilippe Sandler
  5. NECYellow cardAhmetcan Kaplan
  6. NECYellow cardTjaronn Chery
  7. NECSubstitutionOn: Deveron FonvilleOff: Philippe Sandler
  8. FeyenoordSubstitutionOn: Aymen SlitiOff: Tobias van den Elshout
  9. FeyenoordYellow cardJakub Moder
  10. FeyenoordSubstitutionOn: Jeremiah St. JusteOff: Thijs Kraaijeveld
  11. FeyenoordSubstitutionOn: Casper TengstedtOff: Ayase Ueda
  12. FeyenoordYellow cardOussama Targhalline

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: NEC 1 - 0 - 0 Feyenoord. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of NEC vs Feyenoord?

The Eredivisie match finished NEC 1:1 Feyenoord. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before NEC vs Feyenoord?

NEC score 2.45 goals per game on average and Feyenoord 2.10. The Eredivisie average is 3.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 79% of NEC's matches and 59% of Feyenoord's.

What form are NEC and Feyenoord in?

Over the last 5 games NEC have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Feyenoord 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for NEC vs Feyenoord?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.