NEC vs Mbarara City: match statistics
NEC vs Mbarara City: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
NEC played Mbarara City in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match was played on 24 April 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
NEC: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Mbarara City: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
NEC scores 1.00 and concedes 0.67 goals per match. Mbarara City scores 0.79 and concedes 1.58. League average: 2.06 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: NEC 42%, Mbarara City 58%. Over 2.5: NEC 21%, Mbarara City 38%. League level: BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 35%.
xG, shots and style
NEC has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.35. NEC: 9.6 shots per match, Mbarara City: 8.3.
Match halves
NEC: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.63. Mbarara City: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.38.
Goals by minute
NEC: 61-75 (7 goals). Mbarara City: 16-30 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Uganda Premier League: 2.06 goals per match, BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 35%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win for NEC, as they sit 6th versus Mbarara’s 14th and hold clear advantages across key metrics. NEC’s home defense is solid — conceding 0.67 goals per match and keeping a clean sheet in 58% of games, while Mbarara concede 2.08 goals per away match with only 8% clean sheets; the visitors have conceded 8 goals in their last 5 matches, whereas NEC have not conceded in their last 5. Offensively NEC average 1.17 goals per home match with xG 1.58, 3.75 shots on target and an 11% conversion rate, compared to Mbarara’s 0.83 away goals, xG 1.31, 3.0 shots on target and 8% conversion — giving the hosts higher chance-creation efficiency. Form confirms the edge: NEC average 2.2 points in their last 5 (3 wins, 2 draws), while Mbarara are winless in five and average 0.4 points. I assess the probabilities roughly as 75% NEC, 15% draw and 10% for the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have high BTTS rates this season: NEC 50% and Mbarara City 67%, averaging 58.5%, which is well above the league level of 39%. Mbarara City have serious defensive issues: they concede 2.08 goals per match on average (38 conceded this season), their xG against is 1.91, and in the last 5 matches they conceded 8 goals (1.6 per match). NEC, on the other hand, score poorly — 0.75 goals per match (24 goals this season) and in the last 5 matches they scored 3 goals (0.6 per match), but they did not concede in those 5 games, which weakens the BTTS signal from their side. Both teams generate solid xG however: NEC 1.39 and Mbarara 1.31 and register 3.2 and 3.0 shots on target respectively, and with low conversion rates of 9% and 8% there is a real chance of goals from both sides. Considering Mbarara’s high seasonal BTTS of 67% and their poor defense (2.08 conceded on average), I favor the 'yes' scenario and propose a split of 65% for 'yes' and 35% for 'no'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and conversion analysis shows a discrepancy: NEC xG = 1.39 and xG against Mbarara = 1.91 model to 1.65 for the home side, while NEC’s conversion (8.8 shots × 9% ≈ 0.79) suggests less; averaging these approaches yields NEC expected goals ≈ 1.22. For Mbarara xG_for = 1.31 and opponent xG_against = 1.50 give 1.405, conversion 10.45×8% ≈ 0.84, averaging yields away expected goals ≈ 1.12, total ≈ 2.34 goals. Since the projected 2.34 exceeds 1.5 by 0.84 and both teams have a high share of matches over 1.5 (NEC 50%, Mbarara 83%) and both have 92% of matches with at least one goal, Over 1.5 has strong backing (≈75%). The 2.5 line is less certain: season Over 2.5 is 33% for NEC and 42% for Mbarara, and the league average is 35%, so with a forecast of 2.34 I assign Over 2.5 ≈42% (Under 58%). Over 3.5 looks unlikely — only 8% of NEC matches and 33% of Mbarara matches finish above 3.5, so Under 3.5 ≈88%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time appears most likely: the home side drew at the break in 64% of their home matches (drawingAtHTPercentage_home = 64%) and as much as 80% in their last 5 matches at half-time (last5_drawingAtHTPercentage_overall_home = 80%), so I estimate the aggregate chance of an HT draw at roughly 58%. In the second half the home team are the favorites — they have a 60% win rate in their last 5 matches (last5_winPercentage_overall_home = 60%), while the visitors have won none of their last five (last5_winPercentage_overall_away = 0%), which increases the likelihood of a home win after 90 minutes. Offensive/defensive metrics confirm this: the hosts produce xG 1.39 versus the visitors’ 1.31 (xg_for_avg_home = 1.39 vs xg_for_avg_away = 1.31), and the away side concedes on average 1.17 goals by half-time and have higher xG conceded (concededAVGHT_away = 1.17, xg_against_avg_away = 1.91 vs xg_against_avg_home = 1.5), so the visitors are more at risk of failing to hold a lead. For these reasons I select the HT/FT scenario draw/home (X/1) as the strongest signal and assign it approximately a 34% probability; the second option is draw/draw or the home side leading at the break with a final win.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| NEC | Mbarara City | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
NEC is 450% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - NEC · 0.4 pts / match - Mbarara City
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
NEC is 27% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - NEC · 0.79 goals / match - Mbarara City
NEC is 136% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.67 goals / match - NEC · 1.58 goals / match - Mbarara City
NEC scores in 79% of matches (19 of 24 matches), while Mbarara City keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 24 matches).
Mbarara City scores in 67% of matches (16 of 24 matches), while NEC keeps a clean sheet in 54% (13 of 24 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - NEC
Over / Under - Mbarara City
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
NEC is 70% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / match - NEC · 0.88 pts / match - Mbarara City
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
NEC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Mbarara City - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 13%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 100% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
NEC
Mbarara City
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).
Teams vs league
| NEC | Liga | Mbarara City | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.67 | 2.06 | ▲ 2.38 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 42% | 39% | ▲ 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 21% | 35% | ▲ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 54% | 38% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 42% | 59% | ▲ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 67% | 58% | ▲ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: NEC 1 - 0 - 0 Mbarara City. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of NEC vs Mbarara City?
The Uganda Premier League match finished NEC 1:0 Mbarara City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before NEC vs Mbarara City?
NEC score 1.00 goals per game on average and Mbarara City 0.79. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.06 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 42% of NEC's matches and 58% of Mbarara City's.
What form are NEC and Mbarara City in?
Over the last 5 games NEC have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Mbarara City 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for NEC vs Mbarara City?
The statistical background for NEC vs Mbarara City — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


