Neom SC vs Al Feiha: match statistics
Neom SC vs Al Feiha: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Neom SC played Al Feiha in Professional League (Saudi Arabia). The match was played on 4 April 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Neom SC: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Al Feiha: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Neom SC scores 1.19 and concedes 1.38 goals per match. Al Feiha scores 1.31 and concedes 1.58. League average: 3.04 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Neom SC 62%, Al Feiha 54%. Over 2.5: Neom SC 54%, Al Feiha 58%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 57%.
xG, shots and style
Neom SC has higher xG: 1.34 vs 1.06. Neom SC: 12.1 shots per match, Al Feiha: 10.1.
Match halves
Neom SC: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.62. Al Feiha: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.69.
Goals by minute
Neom SC: 76-90+ (9 goals). Al Feiha: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Professional League: 3.04 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 57%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win. Neom averages 12.31 shots and 4.62 on target per home match with xG 1.36, while Al Feiha away records 10.23 shots, 3.08 on target and xG 1.04. Neom concedes 1.62 goals at home versus 2.08 conceded by Al Feiha on the road, and clean sheet rate is 23% for Neom compared to only 8% for the visitors, giving the hosts a defensive edge. Conversely, Al Feiha have been in better recent form: 11 goals in their last 5 matches and an average of 2 points per match (3 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss), whereas Neom have scored 5 goals and average 1 point per match (1-2-2). Considering superior ball control from the hosts (52% vs 43%), a higher number of shots on target and a lower risk of failing to score (15% vs 31%), I assign a 50% probability to a Neom win, 25% to a draw and 25% to an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
BTTS indicators and form point to both teams scoring: both sides have BTTS in 60% of their last 5 matches (Neom 60%, Al Feiha 60%), while the league average BTTS is 59%. Al Feiha concedes 2.08 goals per match on average and records only 8% clean sheets, whereas Neom concedes 1.08 goals per match and keeps 46% clean sheets, which favors goals from the visitors. Offensively, Al Feiha scored 11 goals in the last 5 matches (2.2 per match) versus Neom’s 5 goals (1.0 per match); average xG is 1.08 for Neom and 1.04 for Al Feiha, with xG against of 1.38 and 1.48 respectively, showing both teams create and concede chances. Season BTTS rates are 46% for Neom and 62% for Al Feiha, and both teams average around 10 shots and ~3 shots on target per match, increasing the likelihood of goal exchange. Considering the low clean sheet percentage for the visitors (8%), Al Feiha’s recent scoring form and the league BTTS trend of 59%, I rate BTTS - Yes as more probable.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Neom scores on average 1.23 goals and concedes 1.08, while Al Feiha scores 1.38 and concedes 2.08; the arithmetic mean of these values yields an expectation of 1.66 goals for the home side and 1.23 for the away side, totaling 2.89 goals. xG shows 1.08 xG for Neom and 1.04 xG for Al Feiha with xG against 1.48 for the visitors, and shot metrics (9.92 vs 10.23) plus shots on target (3.0 vs 3.08) with conversion rates 12%/14% confirm moderate efficiency and scoring opportunities. Season-over percentages for Over 1.5 are 77% for Neom and 92% for Al Feiha (average ~85%), while Over 2.5 is 38% vs 77% — indicating a strong signal for Over 1.5 and a moderate signal for Over 2.5. A Poisson model with λ=2.89 gives approximately a 78% chance of at least 2 goals, ~55% for at least 3 goals and ~33% for at least 4 goals, so I recommend Over 1.5 as the most secure and statistically justified line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Statistical analysis indicates that a draw at Half-Time is the most likely: home teams lead at the break in 38% of matches, away teams in 31%, while half-time draws occur for homes in 38% and for aways in 23%, with the first half featuring at least one goal in 69% of home matches and 85% of away matches. Nevertheless, over the full match the favorites are the home side — the seasonal average points for homes is 1.54 per game versus 1.0 for aways, and away teams lose 62% of their matches in the season, while homes win 38% and keep a clean sheet in 46% of games. Away teams concede on average 2.08 goals per game versus 1.08 for homes, which suggests that in the event of a draw at Half-Time the home side has a greater chance to turn the result in their favor after the break. Offensive xG is similar (1.08 for homes vs 1.04 for aways), but the home advantage at Half-Time (on average 0.69 goals scored and 0.54 conceded by the break versus 0.54/0.77 for aways) supports an HT/FT scenario of a draw at Half-Time and a home win after 90 minutes.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Neom SC | Al Feiha | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.43 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Al Feiha is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Neom SC · 2 pts / match - Al Feiha
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Feiha is 10% better for: goals scored per match.
1.19 goals / match - Neom SC · 1.31 goals / match - Al Feiha
Neom SC is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.38 goals / match - Neom SC · 1.58 goals / match - Al Feiha
Neom SC scores in 77% of matches (20 of 26 matches), while Al Feiha keeps a clean sheet in 27% (7 of 26 matches).
Al Feiha scores in 73% of matches (19 of 26 matches), while Neom SC keeps a clean sheet in 19% (5 of 26 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Neom SC
Over / Under - Al Feiha
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Neom SC is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.42 pts / match - Neom SC · 1.35 pts / match - Al Feiha
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Neom SC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Al Feiha - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Neom SC
Al Feiha
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).
Teams vs league
| Neom SC | Liga | Al Feiha | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.58 | 3.04 | ▼ 2.88 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 62% | 59% | ▼ 54% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 54% | 57% | • 58% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 23% | ▲ 27% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 62% | 73% | ▲ 77% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 77% | 82% | ▼ 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Neom SC 0 - 1 - 0 Al Feiha. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Neom SC vs Al Feiha?
The Professional League match finished Neom SC 1:0 Al Feiha. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Neom SC vs Al Feiha?
Neom SC score 1.19 goals per game on average and Al Feiha 1.31. The Professional League average is 3.04 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Neom SC's matches and 54% of Al Feiha's.
What form are Neom SC and Al Feiha in?
Over the last 5 games Neom SC have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Al Feiha 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Neom SC vs Al Feiha?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


