Neom SC vs Al Shabab: match statistics
Neom SC vs Al Shabab: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Neom SC play Al Shabab in Professional League (Saudi Arabia). The match date is 11 May 2026 at 18:50. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Neom SC: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Al Shabab: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Neom SC scores 1.26 and concedes 1.41 goals per match. Al Shabab scores 1.29 and concedes 1.68. League average: 3.01 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Neom SC 65%, Al Shabab 62%. Over 2.5: Neom SC 53%, Al Shabab 44%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Al Shabab has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.43. Neom SC: 13.0 shots per match, Al Shabab: 12.8.
Match halves
Neom SC: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.65. Al Shabab: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.76.
Goals by minute
Neom SC: 76-90+ (11 goals). Al Shabab: 46-60 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Professional League: 3.01 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
Neom SC sit 8th in the table while Al Shabab are 13th, which already indicates a home advantage. In the last 5 matches Neom have 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, averaging 1.6 points per game and scoring 9 goals, whereas Al Shabab over the same period have 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses, just 0.6 points per game and 7 goals. At Neom’s ground they average 4.8 shots on target and 52% possession, while Al Shabab away average 3.73 shots on target, 45% possession, 47% draws and fail to score in 47% of away matches. Expected chances are similar (xG Neom 1.37 vs xG Al Shabab 1.27), however the visitors have conceded 13 goals in the last 5 matches versus 8 for Neom and have 52 goals conceded in the season compared to 44 for the hosts; on average Al Shabab concede 1.2 goals away versus 1.47 conceded by Neom at home. Given Neom’s higher points per game (1.6 vs 0.6), greater number of shots on target and the low rate of goalless matches for the hosts (13% vs 47%), I predict a Neom SC victory.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Neom SC | Al Shabab | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Neom SC is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Neom SC · 0.6 pts / match - Al Shabab
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Neom SC is 19% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.41 goals / match - Neom SC · 1.68 goals / match - Al Shabab
Neom SC scores in 79% of matches (27 of 34 matches), while Al Shabab keeps a clean sheet in 21% (7 of 34 matches).
Al Shabab scores in 74% of matches (25 of 34 matches), while Neom SC keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 34 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Neom SC
Over / Under — Al Shabab
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Neom SC is 78% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.41 pts / match - Neom SC · 0.79 pts / match - Al Shabab
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Neom SC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Al Shabab - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Neom SC
Al Shabab
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).
Teams vs league
| Neom SC | Liga | Al Shabab | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.68 | 3.01 | • 2.97 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 65% | 58% | ▲ 62% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 53% | 56% | ▼ 44% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 18% | 23% | ▼ 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 68% | 75% | • 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 82% | 80% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Neom SC 0 - 0 - 1 Al Shabab. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Neom SC vs Al Shabab?
The Professional League match finished Neom SC 2:1 Al Shabab. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Neom SC vs Al Shabab?
Neom SC score 1.26 goals per game on average and Al Shabab 1.29. The Professional League average is 3.01 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Neom SC's matches and 62% of Al Shabab's.
What form are Neom SC and Al Shabab in?
Over the last 5 games Neom SC have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Al Shabab 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Neom SC vs Al Shabab?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Neom SC vs Al Shabab: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.