United States - MLS Next ProData current as of 31 August 2026

New England II vs Huntsville City: match statistics

New England II vs Huntsville City: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

New England II played Huntsville City in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 30 August 2026. Final score: 1:4.

Current form

New England II: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Huntsville City: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

New England II scores 1.67 and concedes 1.42 goals per match. Huntsville City scores 1.58 and concedes 1.75. League average: 3.31 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: New England II 67%, Huntsville City 50%. Over 2.5: New England II 71%, Huntsville City 63%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.

xG, shots and style

New England II has higher xG: 1.89 vs 1.37. New England II: 15.9 shots per match, Huntsville City: 11.0.

Match halves

New England II: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.92. Huntsville City: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.88.

Goals by minute

New England II: 31-45+ (9 goals). Huntsville City: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.31 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

New England II have the stronger case at home: they average 1.62 goals scored from 1.92 xG, while Huntsville City allow opponents 1.60 xG away from home and concede 2.09 goals per match. The hosts create significantly more chances, averaging 16.46 shots and 5.85 on target, compared with 10.64 shots and 4.27 on target for the visitors. Huntsville City fail to score in 36% of their away matches, while New England II keep a clean sheet in 31% of home games, limiting the visitors’ attacking potential. The hosts’ last five matches do not provide complete comfort, as they have lost 3 times and conceded 12 goals, but the visitors have scored only 6 goals during that period. New England II’s home record, with 46% wins, is also more favourable than Huntsville City’s 55% away defeat rate, making a home win the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

New England II has a 54% BTTS rate this season, but both teams have scored in 100% of their last five matches, with an average of 2.4 goals scored and 2.4 conceded. Huntsville City has a lower season BTTS rate of 45%; however, their defence concedes an average of 2.09 goals per match and keeps a clean sheet in only 27% of appearances. The hosts should create plenty of chances, as their recent xG stands at 2.24, while opponents allow an average xG of 1.60. Huntsville’s chances of scoring are supported by the fact that New England II has conceded an average of 2.4 goals in its last five matches, with an average xG conceded of 1.63. The BTTS - Yes pick is therefore slightly stronger, although the hosts’ 46% clean-sheet rate across the entire season leaves a significant risk of a BTTS - No scenario in which the visitors fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

New England II score an average of 1.85 goals per game this season, while Huntsville City concede as many as 2.09 goals per match, clearly favoring goals for the home side. The visitors add an average of 1.27 goals, while New England II’s defense allows opponents 1.46 goals per game, making a goal for Huntsville City a realistic scenario as well. The 1.5 line was covered in 85% of the home team’s matches and in 73% of Huntsville City’s games, with the league average standing at as many as 3.29 goals. New England II’s last five matches produced an average of 4.8 goals, with the team scoring 12 and conceding 12. Additionally, the combined xG rating of both teams is approximately 2.92, which is why Over 1.5 goals has by far the strongest support in the data.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

New England II have a clear first-half advantage: they led at the break in 38% of their matches, compared with just 9% for Huntsville City, while the visitors were trailing after 45 minutes in as many as 45% of their games. The hosts average 0.85 goals scored and just 0.46 conceded before half-time, whereas Huntsville score 0.55 but allow opponents 1.45. New England II’s advantage is also evident over the full match, with the team averaging 1.85 goals compared with the visitors’ 1.27, while Huntsville concede as many as 2.09 goals per game. In their last five matches, the hosts averaged 1.0 goal after the break, and the second half produced at least one goal for them in 100% of their appearances, strengthening the scenario of them maintaining their lead until the final whistle. The risk lies in New England II’s weaker recent defensive record, having conceded an average of 2.4 goals in their last five matches; however, the strongest individual HT/FT option remains the hosts leading at half-time and winning the match (1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
New England IIHuntsville City
9Shots15
New England IIHuntsville City
4Shots on target5
New England IIHuntsville City
1.17xG1.61
New England IIHuntsville City
7Corners3
New England IIHuntsville City
44Dangerous attacks43
New England IIHuntsville City
18Fouls18
New England IIHuntsville City
2Cards3
New England IIHuntsville City

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

New England IIHuntsville City
1.67Goals scored / match1.58
New England IIHuntsville City
1.42Goals conceded / match1.75
New England IIHuntsville City
52%Average possession50%
New England IIHuntsville City
5.67Shots on target / match4.67
New England IIHuntsville City

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.88Shots per match11
New England IIHuntsville City
5.67Shots on target4.67
New England IIHuntsville City
10.5%Shot conversion14.4%
New England IIHuntsville City
52%Possession50%
New England IIHuntsville City
1.89xG for1.37
New England IIHuntsville City
1.27xG against1.55
New England IIHuntsville City

Shooting quality

New England II: AttackingHuntsville City: Efficient finishing
New England IIHuntsville City
Accuracy (shots on target)36%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Huntsville City is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - New England II · 1.4 pts / match - Huntsville City

New England II
WWLLL
Season result split
46% W25% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-6-7
1.63 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-3-4
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LLDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 2.24Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Huntsville City
LLDWW
Season result split
38% W25% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-6-9
1.38 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-1-6
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.49BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

New England II is 6% better for: goals scored per match.

1.67 goals / match - New England II · 1.58 goals / match - Huntsville City

New England II is 23% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.42 goals / match - New England II · 1.75 goals / match - Huntsville City

New England II scoring profile: very strong

New England II scores in 88% of matches (21 of 24 matches), while Huntsville City keeps a clean sheet in 38% (9 of 24 matches).

Huntsville City scoring profile: very strong

Huntsville City scores in 79% of matches (19 of 24 matches), while New England II keeps a clean sheet in 29% (7 of 24 matches).

40Goals scored (season)38
New England IIHuntsville City
34Goals conceded (season)42
New England IIHuntsville City
3.08Average goals in match3.33
New England IIHuntsville City
12Goals scored (last 5)6
New England IIHuntsville City
12Goals conceded (last 5)7
New England IIHuntsville City

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal79%
New England IIHuntsville City
54%2 goals54%
New England IIHuntsville City
21%3 goals17%
New England IIHuntsville City
4%4 goals8%
New England IIHuntsville City

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal63%
New England IIHuntsville City
46%2 goals54%
New England IIHuntsville City
13%3 goals21%
New England IIHuntsville City
13%4 goals17%
New England IIHuntsville City

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time38%
New England IIHuntsville City
13%BTTS in both halves13%
New England IIHuntsville City
33%Scored in both halves29%
New England IIHuntsville City

BTTS and goal count

63%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
New England IIHuntsville City
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
New England IIHuntsville City
100%BTTS - last 540%
New England IIHuntsville City

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
New England IIHuntsville City
46%Min. 2 goals before half-time54%
New England IIHuntsville City
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time21%
New England IIHuntsville City

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
New England IIHuntsville City
46%Min. 2 goals after half-time54%
New England IIHuntsville City
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
New England IIHuntsville City

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Huntsville City is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.17 pts / match - New England II · 1.25 pts / match - Huntsville City

New England II - half-time state
29% leading29% draw42% trailing
Huntsville City - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.17Points per match (1st half)1.25
New England IIHuntsville City
0.75Goals scored (1st half)0.71
New England IIHuntsville City
0.83Goals conceded (1st half)0.92
New England IIHuntsville City
1.58Average goals (1st half)1.63
New England IIHuntsville City
46%Clean sheet before half-time46%
New England IIHuntsville City
50%No goal before half-time46%
New England IIHuntsville City

After half-time (2nd half)

1.67Points per match (2nd half)1.63
New England IIHuntsville City
0.92Goals scored (2nd half)0.88
New England IIHuntsville City
0.58Goals conceded (2nd half)0.83
New England IIHuntsville City
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1.71
New England IIHuntsville City
46%Clean sheet after half-time58%
New England IIHuntsville City
29%No goal after half-time46%
New England IIHuntsville City

New England II - second-half results

42% W42% R17% P
28
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding159%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Huntsville City - second-half results

46% W25% R29% P
30
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

New England II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.20
Goals scored / match1.41.0
Goals conceded / match1.41.0
Average goals in match2.82.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%80%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal0%20%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 7
Huntsville City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.602.00
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-3+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

New England II
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
4
9
16-30
9
7
31-45
8
2
46-60
6
5
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Huntsville City
ScoredConceded
3
8
0-15
7
4
16-30
7
10
31-45
6
4
46-60
7
6
61-75
8
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.21
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-69%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
70%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

New England II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.62
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.37
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
100%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.43
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Huntsville City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
111%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

New England IILigaHuntsville City
Average goals in match 3.083.31 3.33
Both teams scored 67%62% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 71%66% 63%
Clean sheets 29%21% 38%
Goal before half-time 79%77% 71%
Goal after half-time 88%84% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.31
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.89
Home goals / match
1.42
Away goals / match
+33%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
57%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. New England IIGoalMarcos Zambrano-DelgadoAssist: Myles Morgan
  2. Huntsville CityYellow cardZidane Antonio Yañez
  3. Huntsville CityGoalZidane Antonio YañezAssist: Sullivan Sullivan
  4. New England IIYellow cardMarcos Zambrano-Delgado
  5. New England IISubstitutionOn: Schinieder MimyOff: Tylon Smith
  6. Huntsville CityGoalJordan KnightAssist: Charles-Emile Brunet
  7. Huntsville CityYellow cardMaikel Anthony Caicedo Caicedo
  8. Huntsville CityGoalZidane Antonio YañezAssist: Jordan Knight
  9. Huntsville CitySubstitutionOn: Malachi MolinaOff: Jordan Knight
  10. Huntsville CitySubstitutionOn: Maximus EkkOff: Zidane Antonio Yañez
  11. New England IIYellow cardMyles Morgan
  12. Huntsville CityYellow cardIsaiah LeFlore
  13. Huntsville CityGoalCharles-Emile BrunetAssist: Moises Veliz
  14. New England IISubstitutionOn: Jayden DaOff: Javaun Mussenden

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: New England II 1 - 0 - 0 Huntsville City. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

New England Revolution II
1 : 0
Huntsville City FC

FAQ

What was the result of New England II vs Huntsville City?

The MLS Next Pro match finished New England II 1:4 Huntsville City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before New England II vs Huntsville City?

New England II score 1.67 goals per game on average and Huntsville City 1.58. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 67% of New England II's matches and 50% of Huntsville City's.

What form are New England II and Huntsville City in?

Over the last 5 games New England II have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Huntsville City 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for New England II vs Huntsville City?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for New England II vs Huntsville City: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.