United States - MLSGillette StadiumData current as of 30 August 2026

New England Revolution vs New York City: match statistics

New England Revolution vs New York City: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

New England Revolution played New York City in MLS (United States). The match was played on 23 August 2026. Venue: Gillette Stadium. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

New England Revolution: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. New York City: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

New England Revolution scores 1.60 and concedes 1.25 goals per match. New York City scores 1.70 and concedes 1.45. League average: 3.20 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: New England Revolution 55%, New York City 70%. Over 2.5: New England Revolution 65%, New York City 60%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 62%.

xG, shots and style

New England Revolution has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.39. New England Revolution: 11.8 shots per match, New York City: 11.9.

Match halves

New England Revolution: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.95. New York City: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 0.65.

Goals by minute

New England Revolution: 76-90+ (9 goals). New York City: 16-30 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.20 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 62%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

New England Revolution have posted significantly better results at home, winning 73% of their matches, scoring an average of 1.91 goals and conceding just 0.91 per game. New York City score only 1.00 goal per away match, while 38% of those fixtures have ended in defeat; the team has also kept a clean sheet in just 13% of its appearances. The hosts register more shots on target per game (4.36 compared with 3.63) and are considerably more clinical, converting 18% of their attempts into goals versus 11% for the visitors. Neither team’s recent form is particularly convincing, with New England collecting 5 points from five matches and New York City 4, but home advantage and a positive goal difference of +11 favour the hosts. Although New England’s home xG against stands at 1.51, almost identical to the 1.50 conceded by NYC away from home, the hosts’ superior finishing should ultimately secure the win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

New England Revolution have recorded BTTS in 73% of their matches, while New York City have done so in 63%, both exceeding the league average of 62% and strongly supporting a Goal/Goal scenario. The hosts score an average of 2.27 goals per match, while their opponents concede 1.13 on average, and New York City should be able to exploit a Revolution defense that allows 1.64 goals per game. In their last five appearances, both teams averaged 1.4 goals scored, but conceded 1.4 and 1.6 goals respectively, with BTTS occurring in 60% of the hosts’ matches and 80% of the visitors’ games. The creative potential also favors a goals-based scenario: Revolution’s xG stands at 1.55 and New York City’s at 1.12, while the xG conceded by both defenses is 1.36 and 1.50 respectively. Clean sheets are rare, with rates of just 18% for the hosts and 13% for the visitors, making it more likely that both teams will find the net.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

New England Revolution average 2.27 goals per match, while New York City concede 1.13, giving the home side a solid foundation to score at least once. The hosts create an average of 1.55 xG and register 5.73 shots on target, while the visitors’ defence allows an average of 1.50 xG. New York City have lower attacking potential, averaging 1.00 goal and 1.12 xG, but Revolution concede 1.64 goals per match and keep a clean sheet in only 18% of games. In their last five appearances, both teams scored 7 goals, while at least three goals were scored in 60% of each team’s matches. However, the strongest signal is for Over 1.5 goals: the hosts have cleared this line in 100% of their matches this season, compared with 75% for the visitors, with a projected total of 2.79 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

New England Revolution have a clear advantage in the first halves: they were leading at the break in 55% of matches, scoring an average of 1.45 goals, while New York City were trailing at half-time in 50% of games and scored just 0.50 goals. The hosts also create more chances over the course of the match, recording an xG of 1.55 compared with the visitors’ 1.12, as well as 5.73 shots on target per game versus 3.63 for New York City. The visitors’ attack is limited, with the team averaging 1.00 goal per match and failing to score in 50% of first halves. Recent form calls for some caution, but the visitors have lost 3 of their last 5 matches, while New England won the second half in 40% of that period. The most likely scenario therefore remains a New England lead at the break followed by the hosts maintaining their advantage until full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
New England RevolutionNew York City
10Shots12
New England RevolutionNew York City
6Shots on target5
New England RevolutionNew York City
1.53xG1.4
New England RevolutionNew York City
6Corners4
New England RevolutionNew York City
67Dangerous attacks41
New England RevolutionNew York City
6Fouls12
New England RevolutionNew York City
1Cards1
New England RevolutionNew York City

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

New England RevolutionNew York City
1.6Goals scored / match1.7
New England RevolutionNew York City
1.25Goals conceded / match1.45
New England RevolutionNew York City
New England RevolutionNew York City
51%Average possession54%
New England RevolutionNew York City
4.35Shots on target / match5
New England RevolutionNew York City
New England RevolutionNew York City

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.8Shots per match11.95
New England RevolutionNew York City
4.35Shots on target5
New England RevolutionNew York City
13.6%Shot conversion14.2%
New England RevolutionNew York City
51%Possession54%
New England RevolutionNew York City
1.4xG for1.39
New England RevolutionNew York City
1.57xG against1.42
New England RevolutionNew York City

Shooting quality

New England Revolution: Efficient finishingNew York City: Efficient finishing
New England RevolutionNew York City
Accuracy (shots on target)37%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

New England Revolution
WDLLW
Season result split
50% W15% R35% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-3-7
1.65 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-1-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.90Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
New York City
WWDLL
Season result split
35% W25% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-5-8
1.30 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-4
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WDLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

New York City is 6% better for: goals scored per match.

1.6 goals / match - New England Revolution · 1.7 goals / match - New York City

New England Revolution is 16% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.25 goals / match - New England Revolution · 1.45 goals / match - New York City

New England Revolution scoring profile: very strong

New England Revolution scores in 75% of matches (15 of 20 matches), while New York City keeps a clean sheet in 15% (3 of 20 matches).

New York City scoring profile: very strong

New York City scores in 85% of matches (17 of 20 matches), while New England Revolution keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 matches).

32Goals scored (season)34
New England RevolutionNew York City
25Goals conceded (season)29
New England RevolutionNew York City
2.85Average goals in match3.15
New England RevolutionNew York City
10Goals scored (last 5)9
New England RevolutionNew York City
7Goals conceded (last 5)8
New England RevolutionNew York City

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal85%
New England RevolutionNew York City
45%2 goals45%
New England RevolutionNew York City
20%3 goals25%
New England RevolutionNew York City
10%4 goals10%
New England RevolutionNew York City

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal85%
New England RevolutionNew York City
30%2 goals40%
New England RevolutionNew York City
15%3 goals15%
New England RevolutionNew York City
5%4 goals5%
New England RevolutionNew York City

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
New England Revolution - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 20 matches
63%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time35%
New England RevolutionNew York City
0%BTTS in both halves10%
New England RevolutionNew York City
25%Scored in both halves35%
New England RevolutionNew York City

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
New England RevolutionNew York City
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
New England RevolutionNew York City
60%BTTS - last 5100%
New England RevolutionNew York City

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time90%
New England RevolutionNew York City
45%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
New England RevolutionNew York City
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
New England RevolutionNew York City

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
New England RevolutionNew York City
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
New England RevolutionNew York City
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
New England RevolutionNew York City

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

New York City is 43% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.15 pts / match - New England Revolution · 1.65 pts / match - New York City

New England Revolution - half-time state
30% leading25% draw45% trailing
New York City - half-time state
45% leading30% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.15Points per match (1st half)1.65
New England RevolutionNew York City
0.65Goals scored (1st half)1.05
New England RevolutionNew York City
0.8Goals conceded (1st half)0.6
New England RevolutionNew York City
1.45Average goals (1st half)1.65
New England RevolutionNew York City
45%Clean sheet before half-time40%
New England RevolutionNew York City
60%No goal before half-time35%
New England RevolutionNew York City

After half-time (2nd half)

1.75Points per match (2nd half)1.1
New England RevolutionNew York City
0.95Goals scored (2nd half)0.65
New England RevolutionNew York City
0.45Goals conceded (2nd half)0.85
New England RevolutionNew York City
1.4Average goals (2nd half)1.5
New England RevolutionNew York City
60%Clean sheet after half-time45%
New England RevolutionNew York City
40%No goal after half-time45%
New England RevolutionNew York City

New England Revolution - second-half results

50% W25% R25% P
23
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.15
PPG before half-time
Lead holding167%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

New York City - second-half results

25% W35% R40% P
33
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.65
PPG before half-time
Lead holding78%

Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 35%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

New England Revolution - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.80
Goals scored / match1.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.81.6
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 6
New York City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.200.60
Goals scored / match1.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match2.21.2
1 goal100%60%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal0%80%
Goal difference+5-4
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 8

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

New England Revolution
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
3
6
16-30
6
9
31-45
6
4
46-60
4
2
61-75
9
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

New York City
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
9
4
16-30
7
5
31-45
6
3
46-60
3
6
61-75
4
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

New England Revolution

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

New York City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
125%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
12% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
12%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

New England RevolutionLigaNew York City
Average goals in match 2.853.20 3.15
Both teams scored 55%63% 70%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 65%62% 60%
Clean sheets 25%21% 15%
Goal before half-time 80%77% 90%
Goal after half-time 85%81% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.20
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.84
Home goals / match
1.36
Away goals / match
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. New England RevolutionGoalDor TurgemanAssist: Peyton Miller
  2. New York CityYellow cardKeaton Alexander Parks
  3. New England RevolutionSubstitutionOn: Judah SiqueiraOff: Jackson Yueill
  4. New England RevolutionYellow cardJack David Harrison
  5. New England RevolutionSubstitutionOn: Cody BakerOff: Matt Polster

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of New England Revolution vs New York City?

The MLS match finished New England Revolution 1:1 New York City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before New England Revolution vs New York City?

New England Revolution score 1.60 goals per game on average and New York City 1.70. The MLS average is 3.20 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 55% of New England Revolution's matches and 70% of New York City's.

What form are New England Revolution and New York City in?

Over the last 5 games New England Revolution have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and New York City 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for New England Revolution vs New York City?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for New England Revolution vs New York City: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.