New York RB II vs Crown Legacy: match statistics
New York RB II vs Crown Legacy: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
New York RB II played Crown Legacy in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 24 July 2026. Final score: 0:3.
Current form
New York RB II: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Crown Legacy: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
New York RB II scores 2.11 and concedes 1.53 goals per match. Crown Legacy scores 2.44 and concedes 1.50. League average: 3.23 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: New York RB II 74%, Crown Legacy 61%. Over 2.5: New York RB II 84%, Crown Legacy 72%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.
xG, shots and style
New York RB II has higher xG: 1.78 vs 1.70. New York RB II: 14.7 shots per match, Crown Legacy: 14.4.
Match halves
New York RB II: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 1.21. Crown Legacy: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 1.11.
Goals by minute
New York RB II: 61-75 (9 goals). Crown Legacy: 0-15 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS Next Pro: 3.23 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 7.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (1). New York RB II average 3.11 goals per home match and have a 67% win rate at their stadium; in the last 5 games they scored 13 and conceded 7, yielding roughly 1.4 points per match in that period. Crown Legacy score 2.63 goals away on average but concede as many as 2.13 goals per away match and have 0% clean sheets on the road; additionally, in their last 5 away matches they have conceded 11 goals. The hosts also create more high-quality chances: average xG at home is 2.02 versus the visitors’ average away xG of 1.81, and they also record more shots (16.89 vs 12.63) and shots on target (6.89 vs 5.38), although the visitors are slightly more efficient (conversion 21% vs 18%). Considering the advantage in chance creation, a better goal balance over the last 5 matches and the visitors’ weaker defence, I assess the probabilities as 65% for the hosts, 20% for a draw and 15% for the away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest case for BTTS is Crown Legacy’s statistic — the away side have seen Both Teams To Score in 88% of their matches this season, versus a league average of 61%. Both teams produce similar xG figures: New York xG_for 1.71, Crown xG_for 1.69; season goal averages are 2.3 for New York (40 goals) and 2.63 for Crown (44 goals), indicating a real ability for both sides to score. Defensively Crown is more vulnerable — the visitors concede 2.13 goals per game with xG against 1.81, while New York concedes 1.0 goals per game with xG against 1.26; this increases the likelihood that both sides will find the net. In the last 5 matches New York scored 13 goals (2.6 per game) and conceded 7 (1.4), while Crown scored 7 goals (1.4) and conceded 11 (2.2), further confirming the visitors’ weaker defense. Considering Crown’s 88% BTTS rate, the balanced xG (1.71 vs 1.69) and the seasonal goals and concessions, I assess a 70% probability for BTTS - Yes and 30% for BTTS - No, therefore I recommend a "yes" bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on home xG 1.71 and away xG 1.69, and xG conceded 1.26 (home) and 1.81 (away), I derive estimated goals of 1.76 for New York RB II and 1.48 for Crown Legacy, totaling 3.24 expected goals. Seasonal figures confirm offensive tendencies: hosts average 2.3 goals/game, visitors 2.63, and percentage of matches over 1.5 is 80% for hosts and 100% for visitors. Percentages over 2.5 are also high (60% hosts, 88% visitors) and in the last 5 matches the hosts had 100% of games above 2.5; additionally shots 15.8 vs 12.63, shots on target 5.0 vs 5.38 and conversion 15% vs 21% support a higher goal count. Visitors have no clean sheets (0%) and 88% of their matches feature both teams scoring, increasing the likelihood both sides will net; this translates in my model to ~92% for Over 1.5, ~78% for Over 2.5 and ~41% for Over 3.5. Therefore the strongest signal is a bet on Over 1.5, as xG 3.24 and seasonal 80–100% of matches over 1.5 give it a clear edge.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
New York RB II are clear favorites: the hosts average 2.3 points per match versus Crown Legacy's 1.25, with a season win rate of 70% compared to the visitors' 25%. The hosts led at the break in 50% of matches this season and in 60% of their last 5 games, while the visitors led at the break in only 38% of the season and 20% of their last 5, so the most likely HT is the hosts leading. For full-time, New York RB II score 2.3 goals on average and concede 1.0, while Crown Legacy score 2.63 and concede 2.13; with nearly equal attacking xG (1.71 vs 1.69), the visitors' weaker defense (opponent xG against them 1.81 versus 1.26 for the hosts) tilts the balance toward the hosts maintaining their lead. Although Crown Legacy have a very high away BTTS rate (88%), the hosts have 50% clean sheets this season, which together favors the hosts leading and winning; therefore I project HT/FT 1/1 as the strongest signal. I assign this scenario a 34% probability, with significant chances of a host win after a half-time draw (X/1 18%) and a moderate probability of a draw (X/X 12%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| New York RB II | Crown Legacy | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.47 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
New York RB II is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - New York RB II · 1 pts / match - Crown Legacy
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Crown Legacy is 16% better for: goals scored per match.
2.11 goals / match - New York RB II · 2.44 goals / match - Crown Legacy
New York RB II scores in 89% of matches (17 of 19 matches), while Crown Legacy keeps a clean sheet in 28% (5 of 18 matches).
Crown Legacy scores in 89% of matches (16 of 18 matches), while New York RB II keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - New York RB II
Over / Under - Crown Legacy
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Crown Legacy is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.53 pts / match - New York RB II · 1.67 pts / match - Crown Legacy
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
New York RB II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Crown Legacy - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
New York RB II
Crown Legacy
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).
Teams vs league
| New York RB II | Liga | Crown Legacy | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.63 | 3.23 | ▲ 3.94 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 74% | 61% | • 61% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 84% | 65% | ▲ 72% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 16% | 22% | ▲ 28% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 75% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | • 84% | 84% | ▲ 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: New York RB II 1 - 0 - 0 Crown Legacy. Average goals 7.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of New York RB II vs Crown Legacy?
The MLS Next Pro match finished New York RB II 0:3 Crown Legacy. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before New York RB II vs Crown Legacy?
New York RB II score 2.11 goals per game on average and Crown Legacy 2.44. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 74% of New York RB II's matches and 61% of Crown Legacy's.
What form are New York RB II and Crown Legacy in?
Over the last 5 games New York RB II have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Crown Legacy 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for New York RB II vs Crown Legacy?
The statistical background for New York RB II vs Crown Legacy — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


