United States - MLS Next ProData current as of 07 September 2026

New York RB II vs Toronto II: match statistics

New York RB II crest
New York RB II
5 : 0half-time 1:0
Toronto II crest
Toronto II

New York RB II vs Toronto II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

New York RB II played Toronto II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 21 June 2026. Final score: 5:0.

Current form

New York RB II: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Toronto II: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

New York RB II scores 1.93 and concedes 1.57 goals per match. Toronto II scores 1.71 and concedes 1.64. League average: 3.25 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: New York RB II 86%, Toronto II 57%. Over 2.5: New York RB II 79%, Toronto II 71%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 65%.

xG, shots and style

New York RB II has higher xG: 1.79 vs 1.32. New York RB II: 14.9 shots per match, Toronto II: 10.7.

Match halves

New York RB II: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.07. Toronto II: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

New York RB II: 61-75 (6 goals). Toronto II: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.25 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 65%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-0. Average goals 3.33, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

New York RB II average 2.57 goals per home match and register xG 1.99 with 16.57 shots and 59% possession, while Toronto II away average 1.57 goals, xG 1.22 and only 10 shots per game. Hosts produce more shots on target (6.29 vs 4.29) and have scored at least once in every home match (clean sheet rate 0%), whereas visitors fail to score in 43% of their away games. Despite a seasonal advantage in chance creation, New York RB II are performing poorly in the short term — in the last 5 matches they have scored only 5 goals, conceded 13 and average just 0.2 points per game in that period, while Toronto II have 10 goals and 2.0 points per game in the same window. Defensively both teams concede on average 1.57 goals in home/away fixtures, but xG against indicates greater danger from the visitors (1.78 vs 1.37). Considering the hosts’ superiority in shots, possession and home xG, but also their poor 5-game run, I tip a home win (1) with moderate probability.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Statistical analysis favors the "BTTS - Yes" scenario: New York RB II posts a season BTTS of 86% (80% in last 5), while Toronto II, despite a season BTTS of only 29%, also sits at 80% in their last 5 matches. Home side averages 1.86 goals per season (xG 1.42) and rarely keeps a clean sheet (only 14%), and they have conceded an average of 2.6 goals in the last 5 matches, increasing the likelihood opponents will score. Visitors average 1.57 goals for the season (xG 1.22) and have netted 2.0 goals on average with 1.32 xG per game over the last 5, showing real scoring capability despite a season clean sheet rate of 43%. Additionally, the league has an overall BTTS rate of 62% and an average of 3.25 goals per match, and the combined season xG of both teams is about 2.64 (1.42+1.22), which supports goal exchange. Considering the home side’s high season BTTS of 86%, both teams’ form over the last 5 (80% each), and the combined xG and scoring averages, I recommend a 'yes' pick with a probability of 70% versus 30% for 'no'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

For valuation I paired xG with defensive conceding averages: New York RB II offensive xG is 1.42, while Toronto II xG against is 1.78, yielding an estimated 1.60 goals for the home side; similarly Toronto II offensive xG 1.22 versus home xG against 1.68 yields 1.45 goals for the visitors. I added comparison of seasonal goals (home 1.86, away 1.57) and form from the last 5 matches (average xG: home 1.73, away 1.32), which after averaging gives expected 1.67 goals for the home team and 1.50 for the away team, total 3.17 goals. The stats confirm a tendency to higher totals: home side have 86% of matches over 2.5 goals this season, visitors 57%, and in the last 5 fixtures over 2.5 occurred for both teams in 80% of cases; the league average is 3.25 goals per game. Additionally the hosts average 11.43 shots (5.0 on target), visitors 10.0 (4.29 on target) with finishing rate 16%, and season-long co-occurrence of over 2.5 with both teams scoring for the hosts is 86%, which strengthens the signal for Over. Based on this I recommend Over 2.5 as the strongest signal (best line), noting Over 1.5 is practically certain, while Over 3.5 is riskier (~36% probability due to divergence: hosts 29% Over 3.5 vs visitors 57%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

At half-time the home side led in 3 of 7 matches (43%), the score was level in 3/7 (43%), and the visitors led in only 1/7 (14%), indicating NY RB II’s advantage in the first half. The home team scores on average 1.0 goal by the break versus 0.43 for the visitors and posts 1.42 xG compared to 1.22 for Toronto II, so they create more chances before half-time. Over the season the home side wins 57% of matches versus 29% for the visitors and average 5.0 shots on target against the visitors’ 4.29, therefore the scenario of the home side leading at the break and winning the match (HT/FT 1/1) I assess as the strongest (~34%). It should be noted, however, that the visitors are relatively more dangerous after the break: they score on average 1.14 goals in the second half versus 0.86 for the home team, and more than 0.5 goals in the second half occurs in 71% of the visitors’ matches, which increases the chances of scenarios with an opening draw and a turnaround (HT/FT X/1 ~22%, X/2 ~11%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
4 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
New York RB IIToronto II
20Shots13
New York RB IIToronto II
7Shots on target6
New York RB IIToronto II
2.17xG1.63
New York RB IIToronto II
5Corners7
New York RB IIToronto II
60Dangerous attacks55
New York RB IIToronto II
20Fouls12
New York RB IIToronto II
1Cards0
New York RB IIToronto II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

New York RB IIToronto II
1.93Goals scored / match1.71
New York RB IIToronto II
1.57Goals conceded / match1.64
New York RB IIToronto II
58%Average possession48%
New York RB IIToronto II
5.64Shots on target / match4.64
New York RB IIToronto II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.86Shots per match10.71
New York RB IIToronto II
5.64Shots on target4.64
New York RB IIToronto II
13%Shot conversion16%
New York RB IIToronto II
58%Possession48%
New York RB IIToronto II
1.79xG for1.32
New York RB IIToronto II
1.38xG against1.73
New York RB IIToronto II

Shooting quality

New York RB II: DominantToronto II: Efficient finishing
New York RB IIToronto II
Accuracy (shots on target)38%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Toronto II is 900% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - New York RB II · 2 pts / match - Toronto II

New York RB II
LLDLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W21% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-3-4
1.71 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.73Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Toronto II
WDWWL
Season result split
43% W21% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-5
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-3
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LWLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

New York RB II is 13% better for: goals scored per match.

1.93 goals / match - New York RB II · 1.71 goals / match - Toronto II

New York RB II scoring profile: very strong

New York RB II scores in 93% of matches (13 of 14 matches), while Toronto II keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 matches).

Toronto II scoring profile: very strong

Toronto II scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while New York RB II keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 14 matches).

27Goals scored (season)24
New York RB IIToronto II
22Goals conceded (season)23
New York RB IIToronto II
3.5Average goals in match3.36
New York RB IIToronto II
5Goals scored (last 5)10
New York RB IIToronto II
13Goals conceded (last 5)8
New York RB IIToronto II

How often they score at least...

93%1 goal79%
New York RB IIToronto II
57%2 goals64%
New York RB IIToronto II
29%3 goals14%
New York RB IIToronto II
14%4 goals7%
New York RB IIToronto II

How often they concede at least...

93%1 goal71%
New York RB IIToronto II
36%2 goals43%
New York RB IIToronto II
21%3 goals29%
New York RB IIToronto II
7%4 goals14%
New York RB IIToronto II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time14%
New York RB IIToronto II
0%BTTS in both halves14%
New York RB IIToronto II
29%Scored in both halves36%
New York RB IIToronto II

BTTS and goal count

64%Min. 3 goals and BTTS57%
New York RB IIToronto II
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
New York RB IIToronto II
80%BTTS - last 580%
New York RB IIToronto II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
New York RB IIToronto II
57%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
New York RB IIToronto II
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
New York RB IIToronto II

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
New York RB IIToronto II
71%Min. 2 goals after half-time71%
New York RB IIToronto II
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
New York RB IIToronto II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Toronto II is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.36 pts / match - New York RB II · 1.57 pts / match - Toronto II

New York RB II - half-time state
29% leading50% draw21% trailing
Toronto II - half-time state
36% leading50% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.36Points per match (1st half)1.57
New York RB IIToronto II
0.86Goals scored (1st half)0.71
New York RB IIToronto II
0.79Goals conceded (1st half)0.36
New York RB IIToronto II
1.64Average goals (1st half)1.07
New York RB IIToronto II
50%Clean sheet before half-time79%
New York RB IIToronto II
50%No goal before half-time50%
New York RB IIToronto II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.57Points per match (2nd half)1
New York RB IIToronto II
1.07Goals scored (2nd half)1
New York RB IIToronto II
0.79Goals conceded (2nd half)1.29
New York RB IIToronto II
1.86Average goals (2nd half)2.29
New York RB IIToronto II
43%Clean sheet after half-time36%
New York RB IIToronto II
29%No goal after half-time36%
New York RB IIToronto II

New York RB II - second-half results

36% W50% R14% P
19
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding172%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Toronto II - second-half results

21% W36% R43% P
22
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.57
PPG before half-time
Lead holding119%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.9

Concedes 0.9 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

New York RB II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.00
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match1.41.2
Average goals in match1.62.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-6-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Toronto II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.000.80
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.41.2
Average goals in match1.42.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

New York RB II
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
5
4
16-30
4
4
31-45
4
5
46-60
6
4
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Toronto II
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
3
2
16-30
5
2
31-45
3
5
46-60
5
5
61-75
6
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.42
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
72%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-3%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
73%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

New York RB II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.41
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.51
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Toronto II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.41
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.39
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
118%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

New York RB IILigaToronto II
Average goals in match 3.503.25 3.36
Both teams scored 86%62% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 79%65% 71%
Clean sheets 7%21% 29%
Goal before half-time 71%75% 57%
Goal after half-time 79%84% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.25
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.80
Home goals / match
1.45
Away goals / match
+24%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
60%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. New York RB IIYellow cardAimar Omar Sánchez Gómez
  2. New York RB IIAssistMijahir Ameth Jiménez Murillo
  3. New York RB IISubstitutionOn: Christian GallagherOff: Mijahir Ameth Jiménez Murillo
  4. New York RB IIAssistDennis Nelich

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): New York RB II 2 - 1 - 0 Toronto II. Average goals 3.33, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Toronto II
1 : 2
New York RB II
New York Red Bulls II
2 : 1
Toronto FC II USL
Toronto FC II USL
2 : 2
New York Red Bulls II

FAQ

What was the result of New York RB II vs Toronto II?

The MLS Next Pro match finished New York RB II 5:0 Toronto II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between New York RB II and Toronto II?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches New York RB II won 2, Toronto II won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before New York RB II vs Toronto II?

New York RB II score 1.93 goals per game on average and Toronto II 1.71. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.25 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 86% of New York RB II's matches and 57% of Toronto II's.

What form are New York RB II and Toronto II in?

Over the last 5 games New York RB II have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Toronto II 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for New York RB II vs Toronto II?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.