New Zealand vs Egypt: match statistics
New Zealand vs Egypt: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
New Zealand played Egypt in World Cup (International). The match was played on 22 June 2026. Venue: BC Place Stadium. Final score: 1:3.
Current form
New Zealand: 0-1-0, 1.00 points/match. Egypt: 0-1-0, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
New Zealand scores 2.00 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. Egypt scores 1.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 3.00 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: New Zealand 100%, Egypt 100%. Over 2.5: New Zealand 100%, Egypt 0%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 51%.
xG, shots and style
New Zealand has higher xG: 1.77 vs 1.33. New Zealand: 14.0 shots per match, Egypt: 14.0.
Match halves
New Zealand: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.00. Egypt: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 0.00.
Goals by minute
New Zealand: 0-15 (1 goals). Egypt: 16-30 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
World Cup: 3.00 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 51%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
New Zealand, after the 2:2 with Iran, is no longer a straightforward underdog, having taken the lead twice. Egypt performed very well against Belgium, showed quick transitions and the Salah–Marmoush pairing looked dangerous. Main pick: Egypt, but given New Zealand’s form a draw is stronger than it was before the tournament. Status: SMALL BET
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Pick: BTTS - Yes. New Zealand scored twice against Iran and demonstrated a clear route to goal via Chris Wood and direct service into dangerous areas. Egypt scored against Belgium and also generated late chances through Salah, Marmoush and quick attacks between the lines. Group G has already produced goals from every team, and this matchup features sufficient attacking triggers on both sides to keep BTTS - Yes above the market line. Status: BET
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Pick: Over 2.5. The model gives 52% for Over 2.5 and 48% for Under 2.5, with xG New Zealand 1.20 and Egypt 1.55 (total 2.75). New Zealand scored two goals against Iran and showed it is no longer a passive underdog. Egypt were dangerous against Belgium, especially on quick transitions via Salah and Marmoush. Both teams, after the first match, have real reasons to play for the win, so the goal profile is high. The 2.5 line is playable mainly because after the opening round we see greater defensive susceptibility and an increased need to react after conceding a goal. Status: NOBET
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Pick: X/2 (draw at half-time and Egypt win after 90 minutes). The model assigns this scenario 23%, with a 1X2 distribution: New Zealand 27%, draw 30%, Egypt 43%. xG is 1.20 for New Zealand, 1.55 for Egypt and 2.75 overall, and BTTS profile is YES 63% / NO 37%. New Zealand scored two goals against Iran and is no longer a passive underdog. Egypt looked dangerous versus Belgium, especially on quick transitions and due to quality in attack. Egypt has the higher ceiling, but because New Zealand gained confidence from the first match, X/2 fits better than 2/2. The largest HT/FT scenarios in the model are: X/2 23%, X/1 16%, 2/2 16%. The main risks are a quick turnaround by the favorite or an underdog counter goal, but baseline expectation is that the quality gap will be more decisive after the break. Status: SMALL BET
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| New Zealand | Egypt | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 57% | 21% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
New Zealand is 100% better for: goals scored per match.
2 goals / match - New Zealand · 1 goals / match - Egypt
Egypt is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.
2 goals / match - New Zealand · 1 goals / match - Egypt
New Zealand scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while Egypt keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).
Egypt scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while New Zealand keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - New Zealand
Over / Under - Egypt
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Egypt is 200% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - New Zealand · 3 pts / match - Egypt
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
New Zealand - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Egypt - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 0% |
| No goal | 0% | 0% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 3.00 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 0% |
| No goal | 0% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 61-75 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
New Zealand
Egypt
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (World Cup).
Teams vs league
| New Zealand | Liga | Egypt | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.00 | 3.00 | ▼ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 56% | ▲ 100% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 100% | 51% | ▼ 0% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 26% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 74% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 74% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of New Zealand vs Egypt?
The World Cup match finished New Zealand 1:3 Egypt. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before New Zealand vs Egypt?
New Zealand score 2.00 goals per game on average and Egypt 1.00. The World Cup average is 3.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 100% of New Zealand's matches and 100% of Egypt's.
What form are New Zealand and Egypt in?
Over the last 5 games New Zealand have a 0-1-0 record (1.00 points per game) and Egypt 0-1-0 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for New Zealand vs Egypt?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.