France - Ligue 1Data current as of 11 September 2026

Nice vs Lens: match statistics

Nice crest
Nice
1 : 1half-time 0:0
Lens crest
Lens

Nice vs Lens: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Nice played Lens in Ligue 1 (France). The match was played on 2 May 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Nice: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Lens: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Nice scores 1.13 and concedes 1.84 goals per match. Lens scores 2.00 and concedes 1.07. League average: 2.83 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Nice 58%, Lens 53%. Over 2.5: Nice 52%, Lens 70%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Lens has higher xG: 1.78 vs 1.23. Nice: 11.0 shots per match, Lens: 16.3.

Match halves

Nice: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.55. Lens: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 1.23.

Goals by minute

Nice: 31-45+ (8 goals). Lens: 46-60 (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligue 1: 2.83 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict an away win (2) because Lens sit 2nd in the table with 20 wins this season versus Nice’s 7. In their last 5 matches Lens have 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, scoring 15 goals (3.0 per match) and averaging 2.0 points per match; Nice in that period have 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 5 goals (1.0 per match) and 1.2 points per match. Offensively on the road Lens average 1.73 goals and xG 1.6 with a 12% conversion rate and 4.8 shots on target, while Nice at home average 1.2 goals, xG 1.36, 9% conversion and 4.53 shots on target, indicating superior chance quality and finishing for the visitors. Defensively Nice concede 1.73 goals at home and have 57 goals conceded this season, whereas Lens concede 1.4 goals away and 32 overall, so the visitors are more stable at the back; additionally Nice fail to score in 33% of home matches and Lens fail to score in 27% of away matches, which leaves a minimal probability of a goalless outcome. Considering the advantage in results, last-5 form and chance quality (xG and conversion), I assess Lens’s win probability at 65%, draw 20% and Nice win 15%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Season statistics show Nice have BTTS in 47% of home matches, while Lens have BTTS in 60% of away matches (league average 50%). In the last 5 fixtures these rates rise to 60% for Nice and 80% for Lens, indicating a clear trend toward both teams scoring. Lens have scored 15 goals in their last 5 matches (3.0 per game) with an average xG of 2.48, whereas Nice have scored 5 goals in their last 5 (1.0 per game) and faced an average xG against of 1.74, so the visitors are creating more chances than the home side can shut down. Additionally, Nice score 2.27 goals at home seasonally and keep 47% clean sheets at home, while Lens have only 20% clean sheets away and a seasonal scoring average of 1.73, all of which increases the likelihood of both teams scoring. Based on this I assign BTTS 65% vs 35% and select "yes" as the most probable outcome.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I calculated expected goals from xG: Nice has 1.96 xG at home, while Lens concedes 1.36 xG away — this translates to about 1.66 expected goals for Nice. Conversely Lens has 1.60 xG away, and Nice concedes 1.10 xG at home, giving about 1.35 for Lens and a total of 3.01 expected goals. A Poisson model with λ=3.01 yields roughly an 80% probability for Over 1.5 (P(≤1)≈19.8%), about 58% for Over 2.5 (P(≤2)≈42.1%) and about 36% for Over 3.5 (P(≤3)≈64.5%). Seasonal rates confirm the direction: Nice at home has 73% of matches >1.5 and 67% >2.5, while Lens away has 93% >1.5 and 73% >2.5; additionally in the last 5 matches Lens scored 15 goals (3.0 avg) and had average attacking xG of 2.48, which increases goal probability. At the same time Nice has 47% clean sheets at home and in the last 5 matches scores 1.0 goals on average (recent attacking xG 0.91), so the strongest and safest signal from the data is Over 1.5 and I recommend backing Over at the 1.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Nice led at half-time in 7 home matches (47%) and averages 0.87 goals scored and 0.47 conceded by the break, indicating home control in the first 45 minutes. Over full home matches Nice wins 87% and scores 2.27 goals per game on average, while Lens away averages 1.73 goals and concedes 1.4, so Nice’s advantage persists across the full 90 minutes. The difference is confirmed by xG — Nice 1.96 versus Lens 1.6 — and a higher number of on-target shots for the hosts (6.27 vs 4.8), suggesting more scoring opportunities. Additionally Nice has 60% clean sheets at half-time and more often maintains a lead than Lens (47% HT for Nice vs 33% HT for Lens), therefore the scenario of a home lead at the break and a home win at full-time (1/1) is most likely. I assign 1/1 the highest probability (42%), with alternatives X/1 (20%) and X/X (10%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
NiceLens
9Shots16
NiceLens
2Shots on target4
NiceLens
0.98xG1.6
NiceLens
7Corners8
NiceLens
36Dangerous attacks42
NiceLens
11Fouls10
NiceLens
2Cards5
NiceLens

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.13Goals scored / match2
NiceLens
1.84Goals conceded / match1.07
NiceLens
46%Average possession51%
NiceLens
3.94Shots on target / match5.53
NiceLens

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11Shots per match16.33
NiceLens
3.94Shots on target5.53
NiceLens
10.3%Shot conversion12.2%
NiceLens
46%Possession51%
NiceLens
1.23xG for1.78
NiceLens
1.69xG against1.23
NiceLens

Shooting quality

Nice: BalancedLens: Attacking
NiceLens
Accuracy (shots on target)36%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Lens is 133% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Nice · 1.4 pts / match - Lens

Nice
LLDDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
23% W29% D48% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-9-15
0.97 pts / match · goal difference -22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-6-5
Last 5 at home
0-3-2
DDLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 0.89Opponent xG: 1.81BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Lens
LWLWD
Season result split
67% W10% D23% L
Season (W-D-L)
20-3-7
2.10 pts / match · goal difference +28
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-3-5
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WDLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 2.54Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Lens is 77% better for: goals scored per match.

1.13 goals / match - Nice · 2 goals / match - Lens

Lens is 72% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.84 goals / match - Nice · 1.07 goals / match - Lens

Nice scoring profile: strong

Nice scores in 68% of matches (21 of 31 matches), while Lens keeps a clean sheet in 33% (10 of 30 matches).

Lens scoring profile: very strong

Lens scores in 83% of matches (25 of 30 matches), while Nice keeps a clean sheet in 16% (5 of 31 matches).

35Goals scored (season)60
NiceLens
57Goals conceded (season)32
NiceLens
2.97Average goals in match3.07
NiceLens
3Goals scored (last 5)12
NiceLens
9Goals conceded (last 5)11
NiceLens

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal83%
NiceLens
29%2 goals63%
NiceLens
13%3 goals37%
NiceLens
3%4 goals10%
NiceLens

How often they concede at least...

84%1 goal67%
NiceLens
48%2 goals27%
NiceLens
29%3 goals13%
NiceLens
16%4 goals0%
NiceLens

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

23%BTTS at half-time20%
NiceLens
6%BTTS in both halves0%
NiceLens
16%Scored in both halves47%
NiceLens

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
NiceLens
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
NiceLens
60%BTTS - last 580%
NiceLens

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
NiceLens
42%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
NiceLens
26%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
NiceLens

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time87%
NiceLens
39%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
NiceLens
16%Min. 3 goals after half-time23%
NiceLens

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lens is 36% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.1 pts / match - Nice · 1.5 pts / match - Lens

Nice - half-time state
29% leading23% draw48% trailing
Lens - half-time state
40% leading30% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.1Points per match (1st half)1.5
NiceLens
0.58Goals scored (1st half)0.77
NiceLens
0.9Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
NiceLens
1.48Average goals (1st half)1.4
NiceLens
35%Clean sheet before half-time50%
NiceLens
65%No goal before half-time47%
NiceLens

After half-time (2nd half)

1.06Points per match (2nd half)2.07
NiceLens
0.55Goals scored (2nd half)1.23
NiceLens
0.94Goals conceded (2nd half)0.43
NiceLens
1.48Average goals (2nd half)1.67
NiceLens
42%Clean sheet after half-time70%
NiceLens
52%No goal after half-time23%
NiceLens

Nice - second-half results

29% W19% D52% L
34
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding79%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 23%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Lens - second-half results

60% W27% D13% L
45
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
62
Second-half points
+24
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding168%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Nice - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.60
Goals scored / match0.00.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-5-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Lens - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.602.00
Goals scored / match0.61.8
Goals conceded / match1.40.8
Average goals in match2.02.6
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%100%
3 goals40%60%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-4+5
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Nice
ScoredConceded
4
9
0-15
6
6
16-30
8
13
31-45
7
8
46-60
4
9
61-75
6
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Lens
ScoredConceded
6
7
0-15
6
6
16-30
11
6
31-45
14
3
46-60
9
7
61-75
14
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (14 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +11 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.02
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-34%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Nice

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.46
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
150%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Lens

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.55
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
163%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
67%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.70
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligue 1).

Teams vs league

NiceLigaLens
Average goals in match 2.972.83 3.07
Both teams scored 58%50% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 52%53% 70%
Clean sheets 16%29% 33%
Goal before half-time 77%71% 83%
Goal after half-time 87%78% 87%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.83
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.60
Home goals / match
1.23
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. LensYellow cardFlorian Thauvin
  2. NiceYellow cardAbdulay Juma Bah
  3. LensSubstitutionOn: Abdallah Dipo SimaOff: Odsonne Édouard
  4. LensYellow cardAdrien Thomasson
  5. NiceGoalAli Abdi
  6. LensSubstitutionOn: Ruben AguilarOff: Florian Thauvin
  7. NiceYellow cardMelvin Bard

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Thomas LéonardMatches officiated: 16
4.13Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 256%Home wins31%Draws13%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Nice 0 - 0 - 1 Lens. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Nice vs Lens?

The Ligue 1 match finished Nice 1:1 Lens. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Nice vs Lens?

Nice score 1.13 goals per game on average and Lens 2.00. The Ligue 1 average is 2.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Nice's matches and 53% of Lens's.

What form are Nice and Lens in?

Over the last 5 games Nice have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Lens 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nice vs Lens?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Nice vs Lens: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.