Niger Tornadoes vs Wikki Tourist: match statistics
Niger Tornadoes vs Wikki Tourist: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Niger Tornadoes played Wikki Tourist in NPFL (Nigeria). The match was played on 29 March 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Niger Tornadoes: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Wikki Tourist: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Niger Tornadoes scores 1.03 and concedes 0.97 goals per match. Wikki Tourist scores 0.80 and concedes 0.97. League average: 1.89 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Niger Tornadoes 29%, Wikki Tourist 37%. Over 2.5: Niger Tornadoes 32%, Wikki Tourist 23%. League level: BTTS 37%, Over 2.5 28%.
xG, shots and style
Niger Tornadoes has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.38. Niger Tornadoes: 8.7 shots per match, Wikki Tourist: 5.3.
Match halves
Niger Tornadoes: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.65. Wikki Tourist: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.30.
Goals by minute
Niger Tornadoes: 76-90+ (10 goals). Wikki Tourist: 31-45+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
NPFL: 1.89 goals per match, BTTS 37%, Over 2.5 28%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Niger Tornadoes have a marked home edge — 67% wins, 1.67 goals scored and only 0.47 conceded per home match. Wikki Tourist show poor away output: just 0.53 goals per game, 60% FTS and only 2.25 SOT on average. xG gap also favors the hosts (1.92 vs 0.92), confirming greater offensive efficiency for Tornadoes. Despite some recent form fluctuations, hosts have high home CS% (73%) and possession advantage (55%), granting match control. On that basis the most likely outcome is a home win; draw less likely, away win unlikely.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistics point to low BTTS probability due to a solid home defence and very poor away finishing. Niger Tornadoes show seasonConcededAVG 0.53 and CS% 53%, indicating many clean sheets. Wikki Tourist record seasonScoredAVG 0.53 and seasonFTSPercentage 60%, often failing to score. xG and SOT gap (home xG_for 1.78, SOT 5.11 vs away xG_for 0.92, SOT 2.25) confirms home superiority in chance creation and away attacking weakness. Considering low league over2.5 and low season BTTS for both teams, recommend BTTS = NO.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and match stats show 1.62 xG for Niger Tornadoes and 0.90 xG for Wikki Tourist, total ~2.52 expected goals. Home side dominates chance creation (12.78 shots and 5.11 S/OT) and has higher efficiency, while visitors produce fewer chances and convert worse. High home xG and relatively weak away defense (1.4 GA season) increase probability of at least two goals. Although Niger has a high CS% (53%), offensive advantage and Poisson distribution favor Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Data show a clear advantage for Niger Tornadoes (higher PPG, xG and more shots) versus Wikki Tourist. HT stats suggest frequent draws at Half-Time for the hosts (drawingAtHTPercentage_home 67%), while a strong second half for the hosts (ppg_2hg_home 1.53, 2HG points 23) indicates turnarounds after the break. Hosts also have better HT defense (seasonCSPercentageHT_home 67%), and visitors are prone to conceding in minutes 31–60. The combination of frequent HT draws and a dominant second half makes HT: draw / FT: home (X/1) the most likely scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Niger Tornadoes | Wikki Tourist | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.26 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.47 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Wikki Tourist is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Niger Tornadoes · 1.4 pts / match - Wikki Tourist
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Niger Tornadoes is 29% better for: goals scored per match.
1.03 goals / match - Niger Tornadoes · 0.8 goals / match - Wikki Tourist
Niger Tornadoes scores in 61% of matches (19 of 31 matches), while Wikki Tourist keeps a clean sheet in 33% (10 of 30 matches).
Wikki Tourist scores in 57% of matches (17 of 30 matches), while Niger Tornadoes keeps a clean sheet in 42% (13 of 31 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Niger Tornadoes
Over / Under - Wikki Tourist
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Niger Tornadoes is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.23 pts / match - Niger Tornadoes · 1.1 pts / match - Wikki Tourist
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Niger Tornadoes - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Wikki Tourist - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Niger Tornadoes
Wikki Tourist
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).
Teams vs league
| Niger Tornadoes | Liga | Wikki Tourist | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.00 | 1.89 | ▼ 1.77 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 29% | 37% | • 37% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 32% | 28% | ▼ 23% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 42% | 38% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 68% | 60% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 68% | 61% | ▼ 47% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Niger Tornadoes 0 - 0 - 1 Wikki Tourist. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Niger Tornadoes vs Wikki Tourist?
The NPFL match finished Niger Tornadoes 2:0 Wikki Tourist. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Niger Tornadoes vs Wikki Tourist?
Niger Tornadoes score 1.03 goals per game on average and Wikki Tourist 0.80. The NPFL average is 1.89 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 29% of Niger Tornadoes's matches and 37% of Wikki Tourist's.
What form are Niger Tornadoes and Wikki Tourist in?
Over the last 5 games Niger Tornadoes have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Wikki Tourist 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Niger Tornadoes vs Wikki Tourist?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.