Niroye Zamini vs Sanat Naft: match statistics
Niroye Zamini vs Sanat Naft: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Niroye Zamini played Sanat Naft in Azadegan League (Iran). The match was played on 16 July 2026. Venue: Shahid Dastgerdi Stadium. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Niroye Zamini: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Sanat Naft: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Niroye Zamini scores 0.78 and concedes 0.91 goals per match. Sanat Naft scores 1.06 and concedes 0.64. League average: 1.58 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Niroye Zamini 28%, Sanat Naft 39%. Over 2.5: Niroye Zamini 25%, Sanat Naft 27%. League level: BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.
xG, shots and style
Sanat Naft has higher xG: 1.09 vs 1.01. Niroye Zamini: 3.2 shots per match, Sanat Naft: 3.8.
Match halves
Niroye Zamini: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.34. Sanat Naft: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 0.76.
Goals by minute
Niroye Zamini: 76-90+ (9 goals). Sanat Naft: 46-60 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Azadegan League: 1.58 goals per match, BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The favorites are the visitors — Sanat Naft: they sit 4th in the table versus 13th-place Niroye Zamini, with 15 wins this season compared to the home side’s 7 wins and a superior goal difference 35–21 versus 25–29. The gap in recent form is clear: Sanat Naft in their last five matches has 3 wins and 2 draws, scoring 8 and conceding 3 (points average 2.2), while Niroye Zamini has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses with a 4:7 record and a points average of 0.8. At home the hosts attempt more shots (8.67 per match) and have a higher conversion rate (14%), translating to 0.88 goals per home match and xG For 1.21; however Sanat Naft have a similar number of shots on target (4.33 vs 4.11) and lower average goals conceded away (0.69 goals conceded on the road with xG Against 1.09). Both teams have a high share of matches without scoring (56% home/away) and a low total goals per match (Niroye 1.63 at home vs Sanat Naft 1.5 away), which points to a low-scoring game. Considering the table advantage, superior goal difference and form (points average 2.2 vs 0.8), I tip the visitors to win (2) — hosts 20%, draw 20%, visitors 60%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I predict no BTTS (No) as the more likely outcome. Seasonal BTTS rates are 47% for Niroye and 31% for Sanat Naft (average ~39%), indicating both teams do not regularly both score. Additionally, both teams have high clean sheet rates: 47% for the home side and 44% for the away side, while the league clean sheet level is as high as 92%, with seasonal average goals conceded only 0.59 and 0.69 respectively, which favors matches with one or no goals scored. Although Sanat have 60% BTTS in their last 5 matches and average 1.6 goals scored, the short-term away signal does not outweigh the strong seasonal trends, therefore I assign 70% to 'No'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and defensive analysis: the home side averages xG 1.08 and concedes 0.68 xG, the visitors average 1.12 xG and concede 1.09 xG; from this I derive expected goals of 1.09 for Niroye Zamini and 0.90 for Sanat Naft, totaling 1.99 expected goals. A Poisson model for a sum of 1.99 yields probability of Over 1.5 goals ≈59%, Over 2.5 ≈32% and Over 3.5 ≈14%, meaning results under 2.5 are more likely (~68%) and especially under 3.5 (~86%). Seasonal indicators confirm low goal potential: only 29% of home matches and 25% of away matches finished Over 2.5, while Under 3.5 occurred in 88% of Niroye Zamini’s matches and 94% of Sanat Naft’s. Additionally, Sanat Naft registers more shots on target (4.33 vs 2.4), but the low total xG and moderate finishing rates (conversion 13% for the home team, 9% for the visitors) do not suggest frequent high-scoring games. Based on this I recommend backing the Under market and select the 3.5 line as the strongest signal (model ~86% and seasonal 88–94%), while Under 2.5 (≈68%) is also a sensible, more conventional alternative.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome: the home team were level at the break in 82% of their matches this season and the away team in 69%, which clearly favors an X result after 45 minutes. At the same time the home side win 59% of matches versus 31% for the visitors and have a strong second half — they average 0.88 goals after the break, win 53% of second halves and score at least one goal after half-time in 71% of matches. The hosts average 1.29 goals per game compared to 0.81 for the guests, have an xG of 1.08 versus the visitors’ 1.12, but concede only 0.68 xG, suggesting greater ability to maintain a lead after scoring. For these reasons the most likely HT/FT scenario is X/1 (draw at half-time, home win), although due to the away side’s form in their last five matches (60% away wins vs 20% for the hosts) an X/X outcome also represents a significant risk.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Niroye Zamini | Sanat Naft | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 26% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.32 | 0.29 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.64 | 1.06 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Sanat Naft is 175% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Niroye Zamini · 2.2 pts / match - Sanat Naft
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sanat Naft is 36% better for: goals scored per match.
0.78 goals / match - Niroye Zamini · 1.06 goals / match - Sanat Naft
Sanat Naft is 42% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.91 goals / match - Niroye Zamini · 0.64 goals / match - Sanat Naft
Niroye Zamini scores in 47% of matches (15 of 32 matches), while Sanat Naft keeps a clean sheet in 45% (15 of 33 matches).
Sanat Naft scores in 64% of matches (21 of 33 matches), while Niroye Zamini keeps a clean sheet in 38% (12 of 32 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Niroye Zamini
Over / Under - Sanat Naft
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Niroye Zamini is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.09 pts / match - Niroye Zamini · 1.03 pts / match - Sanat Naft
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Niroye Zamini - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Sanat Naft - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Niroye Zamini
Sanat Naft
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Niroye Zamini | Liga | Sanat Naft | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 1.69 | 1.58 | ▲ 1.70 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 28% | 30% | ▲ 39% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 25% | 22% | ▲ 27% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 38% | 46% | • 45% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 44% | 46% | ▼ 39% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 53% | 57% | ▲ 64% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Niroye Zamini 0 - 1 - 0 Sanat Naft. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Niroye Zamini vs Sanat Naft?
The Azadegan League match finished Niroye Zamini 0:2 Sanat Naft. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Niroye Zamini vs Sanat Naft?
Niroye Zamini score 0.78 goals per game on average and Sanat Naft 1.06. The Azadegan League average is 1.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 22% of games. Both teams score in 28% of Niroye Zamini's matches and 39% of Sanat Naft's.
What form are Niroye Zamini and Sanat Naft in?
Over the last 5 games Niroye Zamini have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Sanat Naft 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Niroye Zamini vs Sanat Naft?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


