Slovenia - 2. SNLData current as of 18 October 2026

NK Vrhnika vs Rudar: match statistics

NK Vrhnika crest
NK Vrhnika
4 : 2half-time 2:1
Rudar crest
Rudar

NK Vrhnika vs Rudar: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

NK Vrhnika played Rudar in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match was played on 4 September 2026. Final score: 4:2.

Current form

NK Vrhnika: 2-0-2, 1.50 points/match. Rudar: 2-0-2, 1.50 points/match.

Goal statistics

NK Vrhnika scores 1.00 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Rudar scores 1.75 and concedes 1.25. League average: 2.94 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: NK Vrhnika 25%, Rudar 25%. Over 2.5: NK Vrhnika 25%, Rudar 50%. League level: BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 58%.

xG, shots and style

Rudar has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.58. NK Vrhnika: 11.8 shots per match, Rudar: 13.5.

Match halves

NK Vrhnika: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.75. Rudar: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.50.

Goals by minute

NK Vrhnika: 0-15 (1 goals). Rudar: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

2. SNL: 2.94 goals per match, BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 58%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

NK Vrhnika have the clearer edge in home matches: they average 1.0 goals scored and concede just 0.5, while 50% of their games end with a clean sheet. Rudar have lost both of their away matches so far, failed to score in either, and allow opponents an average of 2.0 goals. The hosts also create slightly better chances, with an average xG of 1.41 compared with Rudar’s 1.34, while the visitors’ defence allows 2.18 xG against. Although the visitors are in better overall form, winning 3 of their last 5 matches and scoring 12 goals in that run, their very poor away record points towards NK Vrhnika. A narrow home victory is the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument for BTTS - No is Rudar’s ongoing lack of attacking output: the visitors have failed to score in the current set of fixtures, recording 100% of matches without a goal and a BTTS rate of 0%. Vrhnika defend very solidly at home, conceding an average of just 0.5 goals, keeping a clean sheet in 50% of matches, while their average xG against is only 0.89. The hosts should create enough chances, as they score an average of 3.5 goals, while Rudar concede 2.0 goals per match with an xG against of 2.18. Although Rudar’s last five matches produced an average of 2.4 goals scored and an xG of 1.51, BTTS stood at just 20% during this period, still suggesting frequent No Goal/one-sided scoring scenarios. The pick on "No" is also supported by the league-average BTTS rate of 42%, making a scenario in which at least one team fails to score clearly more likely.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

NK Vrhnika score an average of 3.5 goals at home, while Rudar concede 2.0 goals per away match, which strongly supports the hosts’ attacking output. Vrhnika’s potential is confirmed by an average xG of 1.68, whereas Rudar’s defence allows an average of 2.18 xG. Rudar have yet to score in their away-season data and failed to find the net in 100% of such matches, so the forecast for the visitors remains limited to 0.85 goals. At the same time, both teams generated over 1.5 xG per match across their last five games, while Rudar averaged 2.4 goals scored in those matches, so the total should exceed one goal. Over 1.5 also has the edge because both teams recorded this line in 100% of their available season matches, whereas the 2.5 line is considerably more balanced.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

NK Vrhnika have won both of their league matches so far, scoring an average of 3.5 goals and conceding just 0.5, while Rudar have lost both games, averaging 0 goals scored and 2 conceded per match. However, the hosts were level at half-time in 2 of their 2 matches, whereas Rudar were trailing at the break on both occasions, increasing the likelihood of a cautious opening phase followed by Vrhnika taking control. The quality of chances also favours the hosts: their average xG stands at 1.68, while Rudar allow opponents an xG of 2.18. The second-half pattern is crucial, with Vrhnika averaging 3 goals and winning the second half in 100% of their matches, while Rudar have failed to score after the break and lost every second half. The teams’ last five matches suggest some volatility in form, so a half-time draw followed by a home win at the final whistle is the strongest, though not overwhelmingly certain, scenario in the HT/FT market.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
NK VrhnikaRudar
19Shots11
NK VrhnikaRudar
11Shots on target6
NK VrhnikaRudar
2.84xG1.73
NK VrhnikaRudar
6Corners9
NK VrhnikaRudar
121Dangerous attacks84
NK VrhnikaRudar
19Fouls15
NK VrhnikaRudar
0Cards0
NK VrhnikaRudar

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match1.75
NK VrhnikaRudar
1Goals conceded / match1.25
NK VrhnikaRudar
56%Average possession53%
NK VrhnikaRudar
4Shots on target / match4.25
NK VrhnikaRudar

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.75Shots per match13.5
NK VrhnikaRudar
4Shots on target4.25
NK VrhnikaRudar
8.5%Shot conversion13%
NK VrhnikaRudar
56%Possession53%
NK VrhnikaRudar
1.58xG for1.62
NK VrhnikaRudar
1.35xG against1.61
NK VrhnikaRudar

Shooting quality

NK Vrhnika: BalancedRudar: Efficient finishing
NK VrhnikaRudar
Accuracy (shots on target)34%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.41

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

NK Vrhnika
LWWL
Season result split
50% W0% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-2
1.50 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-2
1.50 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
LW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 25%Over 2.5: 25%
Rudar
LWLW
Season result split
50% W0% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-2
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-2
1.50 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 away
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.62Opponent xG: 1.61BTTS: 25%Over 2.5: 50%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Rudar is 75% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - NK Vrhnika · 1.75 goals / match - Rudar

NK Vrhnika is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - NK Vrhnika · 1.25 goals / match - Rudar

NK Vrhnika scoring profile: strong

NK Vrhnika scores in 50% of matches (2 of 4 matches), while Rudar keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).

Rudar scoring profile: strong

Rudar scores in 50% of matches (2 of 4 matches), while NK Vrhnika keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).

4Goals scored (season)7
NK VrhnikaRudar
4Goals conceded (season)5
NK VrhnikaRudar
2Average goals in match3
NK VrhnikaRudar
4Goals scored (last 5)7
NK VrhnikaRudar
4Goals conceded (last 5)5
NK VrhnikaRudar

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal50%
NK VrhnikaRudar
50%2 goals50%
NK VrhnikaRudar
0%3 goals50%
NK VrhnikaRudar
0%4 goals25%
NK VrhnikaRudar

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal75%
NK VrhnikaRudar
25%2 goals50%
NK VrhnikaRudar
0%3 goals0%
NK VrhnikaRudar
0%4 goals0%
NK VrhnikaRudar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time25%
NK VrhnikaRudar
0%BTTS in both halves0%
NK VrhnikaRudar
25%Scored in both halves25%
NK VrhnikaRudar

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
NK VrhnikaRudar
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
NK VrhnikaRudar
25%BTTS - last 525%
NK VrhnikaRudar

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
NK VrhnikaRudar
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
NK VrhnikaRudar
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
NK VrhnikaRudar

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
NK VrhnikaRudar
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
NK VrhnikaRudar
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
NK VrhnikaRudar

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

NK Vrhnika is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - NK Vrhnika · 0.5 pts / match - Rudar

NK Vrhnika - half-time state
25% leading25% draw50% trailing
Rudar - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)0.5
NK VrhnikaRudar
0.25Goals scored (1st half)0.25
NK VrhnikaRudar
0.75Goals conceded (1st half)0.75
NK VrhnikaRudar
1Average goals (1st half)1
NK VrhnikaRudar
50%Clean sheet before half-time25%
NK VrhnikaRudar
75%No goal before half-time75%
NK VrhnikaRudar

After half-time (2nd half)

1.75Points per match (2nd half)1.5
NK VrhnikaRudar
0.75Goals scored (2nd half)1.5
NK VrhnikaRudar
0.25Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
NK VrhnikaRudar
1Average goals (2nd half)2
NK VrhnikaRudar
75%Clean sheet after half-time50%
NK VrhnikaRudar
50%No goal after half-time50%
NK VrhnikaRudar

NK Vrhnika - second-half results

50% W25% D25% L
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Rudar - second-half results

50% W0% D50% L
2
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

NK Vrhnika - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.75
Goals scored / match0.30.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.3
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal75%75%
2 goals25%25%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%75%
No goal75%50%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 25% leading - 25% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 25% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Rudar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.501.50
Goals scored / match0.31.5
Goals conceded / match0.80.5
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal75%100%
2 goals25%50%
3 goals0%50%
Clean sheet25%50%
No goal75%50%
Goal difference-2+4
Half-time: 0% leading - 50% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 0% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

NK Vrhnika
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Rudar
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
2
31-45
0
0
46-60
2
2
61-75
4
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
85%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
25%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
25%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
25%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

NK Vrhnika

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.58
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
65%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Rudar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.49
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
126%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.3
Late goals
57% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
57%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).

Teams vs league

NK VrhnikaLigaRudar
Average goals in match▼ 2.002.94• 3.00
Both teams scored▼ 25%42%▼ 25%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 25%58%▼ 50%
Clean sheets▼ 25%32%▼ 25%
Goal before half-time• 75%74%• 75%
Goal after half-time▼ 75%81%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.94
Average goals per match
42%
Both teams scored
58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.55
Home goals / match
1.39
Away goals / match
+12%
Home attack advantage
+10%
Home defence advantage
+26%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Filip Nikola Ostojič⚽ 1
—Inas Kukavica⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. NK VrhnikaGoalInas Kukavica
  2. NK VrhnikaGoalFilip Nikola Ostojič

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of NK Vrhnika vs Rudar?

The 2. SNL match finished NK Vrhnika 4:2 Rudar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before NK Vrhnika vs Rudar?

NK Vrhnika score 1.00 goals per game on average and Rudar 1.75. The 2. SNL average is 2.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 25% of NK Vrhnika's matches and 25% of Rudar's.

What form are NK Vrhnika and Rudar in?

Over the last 5 games NK Vrhnika have a 2-0-2 record (1.50 points per game) and Rudar 2-0-2 (1.50 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for NK Vrhnika vs Rudar?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for NK Vrhnika vs Rudar: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.