Nõmme United vs Paide: match statistics
Nõmme United vs Paide: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Nõmme United played Paide in Meistriliiga (Estonia). The match was played on 10 May 2026. Final score: 2:3.
Current form
Nõmme United: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Paide: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Nõmme United scores 2.30 and concedes 2.40 goals per match. Paide scores 1.70 and concedes 1.20. League average: 3.19 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Nõmme United 90%, Paide 60%. Over 2.5: Nõmme United 90%, Paide 60%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 65%.
xG, shots and style
Paide has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.46. Nõmme United: 10.9 shots per match, Paide: 12.1.
Match halves
Nõmme United: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 1.30. Paide: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Nõmme United: 31-45+ (5 goals). Paide: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Meistriliiga: 3.19 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 65%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Nõmme United are favorites at home: they have a 60% home win rate and average 3.4 goals per home match, with 14.2 shots and 6.0 on target per game. Paide away average 2.2 goals with 12.8 shots and 5.8 on target and a 17% conversion rate, so the hosts have the edge in volume and efficiency of attempts (24% vs 17%). Defensively Nõmme is unstable — in their last 5 home matches they conceded 13 goals (2.6 per game), while Paide conceded 5 goals in their last 5 matches (1.0 per game) and have 20% clean sheets on the road. Home xG is 1.8 versus Paide’s 1.62 xG away, and neither team had matches without scoring (0% such games), with Nõmme’s average total goals at home of 5.0, which indicates high potential for goals from both sides. Considering the 60% home win rate, higher shooting efficiency for the hosts and concurrent defensive issues (13 conceded in last 5), I predict a home win with 58% probability, draw 20% and away win 22%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The 'both teams to score' scenario is more likely because Paide has a seasonal BTTS of 80% with an average goals per game of 2.2 and xG of 1.62, plus an average of 5.8 shots on target and a 17% conversion rate, indicating a genuine scoring capability. Nõmme United has recorded BTTS in 100% of their last 5 matches, averaging 2.4 goals scored and 2.6 conceded per game (12 scored and 13 conceded in their last 5), which strongly increases the likelihood of both teams finding the net. Although the home side’s seasonal BTTS is only 40% and they have 40% clean sheets, their recent defensive form is weak (last 5: xG against 1.88 and 13 conceded), which negates arguments against BTTS. Additionally, the league average goals per game is 3.25 and the visitors’ matches exceed 2.5 goals in 80% of cases, supporting a high-scoring scenario. Based on this, I assess BTTS probability at 75% vs 25% and recommend a 'BTTS - Yes' bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG analysis: Home attack xG is 1.44 versus 1.62 for the visitors, and xG conceded is 1.55 (Nõmme) vs 1.45 (Paide), which averaged yields an expected 1.45 goals for Nõmme and 1.58 for Paide (total 3.03). With this combined mean of 3.03 I estimate probabilities at roughly 80% for Over 1.5, 58% for Over 2.5 and 36% for Over 3.5; these figures are close to the league goals average of 3.25 and the league Over 2.5 rate of 67%. Additionally, Paide away have 80% of matches Over 2.5 and 80% BTTS, recording 5.8 shots on target with a 17% conversion, while Nõmme has 3.2 such shots and an 11% conversion — this strengthens the signal for away goals and a high-scoring game overall. Nõmme in the last 5 matches averaged 2.4 goals scored and 2.6 conceded, which confirms an elevated goals tempo in the home side’s form; therefore the best pick is Over 2.5 (side: Over) as the most balanced and value option (58% probability).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
First-half statistics favor the home side — Nõmme United led at the break in 40% of home matches and were level at half-time in 60%, with an average of 0.4 goals scored by half-time and 0.0 conceded (seasonCSPercentageHT_home=100%), so the likelihood of Paide leading at the break is very low. However, Paide have a clear attacking edge: they score on average 2.2 goals per game (seasonScoredAVG_away=2.2), record an xG of 1.62 versus the hosts’ 1.44, and register 5.8 shots on target with a 17% conversion rate (versus 3.2 and 11% for Nõmme), which increases their second-half potential. Second-half data support the visitors’ ability to overturn a deficit — their average goals after the break is 2.4 compared to 1.6 for the home side (AVG_2hg_away=2.4, AVG_2hg_home=1.6), and 80% of Paide’s matches feature more than 1.5 goals in the second half (over15_2hg_percentage_away=80%). Considering that Nõmme rarely concedes before half-time (concededAVGHT_home=0.0) but Paide dominate offensively in the second half, the most probable scenario is a draw at half-time and a Paide victory at full-time, hence the pick X/2 (approx. 27%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Nõmme United | Paide | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.50 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Nõmme United is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Nõmme United · 1.4 pts / match - Paide
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Nõmme United is 35% better for: goals scored per match.
2.3 goals / match - Nõmme United · 1.7 goals / match - Paide
Paide is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.4 goals / match - Nõmme United · 1.2 goals / match - Paide
Nõmme United scores in 90% of matches (9 of 10 matches), while Paide keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 matches).
Paide scores in 90% of matches (9 of 10 matches), while Nõmme United keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 10 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Nõmme United
Over / Under - Paide
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Paide is 23% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.3 pts / match - Nõmme United · 1.6 pts / match - Paide
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Nõmme United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Paide - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 0% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Nõmme United
Paide
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Meistriliiga).
Teams vs league
| Nõmme United | Liga | Paide | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.70 | 3.19 | ▼ 2.90 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 90% | 52% | ▲ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 90% | 65% | ▼ 60% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 25% | ▲ 30% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 90% | 72% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 93% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Nõmme United 0 - 0 - 1 Paide. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Nõmme United vs Paide?
The Meistriliiga match finished Nõmme United 2:3 Paide. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Nõmme United vs Paide?
Nõmme United score 2.30 goals per game on average and Paide 1.70. The Meistriliiga average is 3.19 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 90% of Nõmme United's matches and 60% of Paide's.
What form are Nõmme United and Paide in?
Over the last 5 games Nõmme United have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Paide 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nõmme United vs Paide?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Nõmme United vs Paide: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


