North Texas vs Portland Timbers II: match statistics
North Texas vs Portland Timbers II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
North Texas played Portland Timbers II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 16 August 2026. Venue: Toyota Stadium. Final score: 0:3.
Current form
North Texas: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Portland Timbers II: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
North Texas scores 1.65 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Portland Timbers II scores 1.27 and concedes 1.09. League average: 3.25 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: North Texas 55%, Portland Timbers II 36%. Over 2.5: North Texas 55%, Portland Timbers II 50%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 66%.
xG, shots and style
Portland Timbers II has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.44. North Texas: 11.7 shots per match, Portland Timbers II: 13.8.
Match halves
North Texas: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 1.05. Portland Timbers II: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.95.
Goals by minute
North Texas: 76-90+ (9 goals). Portland Timbers II: 61-75 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS Next Pro: 3.25 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 66%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Portland Timbers II sit 4th, while North Texas are 21st, and the visitors are unbeaten in their last five matches, with a record of 3 wins and 2 draws. The strongest argument in favor of the Portland side is their defense: they have conceded just 2 goals in their last five matches, while keeping a clean sheet in 64% of away games and conceding an average of 1.00 goal. North Texas are an attacking threat at home, scoring an average of 2.50 goals with 5.88 shots on target per match, but their last five matches have seen them concede as many as 10 goals. The hosts create slightly more high-quality chances at home, with an average xG of 1.65 compared to the visitors’ 1.32 away from home, but Portland allow opponents a lower xG—1.37 versus North Texas’ 1.61. The visitors’ away effectiveness, with wins in 73% of their matches, combined with their current defensive stability, points to an away victory, although the hosts’ attack gives them a realistic chance of making this a closely contested match.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The seasonal BTTS figures are clearly below the league average of 61%: North Texas stand at 45%, while Portland Timbers II are at just 27%. Portland have kept a clean sheet in 64% of their matches and have conceded only 2 goals across their last five games—0.4 per match—significantly limiting the hosts’ chances. North Texas do create plenty of opportunities, with an average xG of 1.98 and 6.0 shots on target per game, but they score just 1.18 goals per match and have failed to score in 36% of their appearances. The visitors have recently recorded an xG of 1.45, while the hosts have conceded an average of 2.0 goals over their last five games. However, Portland’s solid defence and low seasonal BTTS rate slightly favour BTTS - No, meaning that at least one team is likely to fail to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The match profile points to a moderate number of goals: North Texas scores an average of 1.18 goals, while Portland Timbers II concedes just 1.00 goal per match. The visitors have kept a clean sheet in 64% of their matches and have conceded only 2 goals in their last five games, averaging 0.4 per outing. Although the hosts create plenty of chances, with an average xG of 1.98 and 6.0 shots on target, their conversion rate is only 7%, which limits the likelihood of a very high-scoring game. Under 3.5 goals has landed in 73% of North Texas matches and as many as 82% of Portland matches, while the 3.5-goal line was exceeded in only 27% and 18% of cases, respectively. The projected total of 2.50 goals gives a clear edge to the Under 3.5 goals bet.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Portland Timbers II win, as the visitors were level after 45 minutes in 8 of their 11 matches this season (73%) and in all of their last five games. Both teams’ first halves tend to produce few goals: each averages just 0.82 total goals before the break, while Portland concedes only 0.45 goals per match in the first half. After the break, the visitors won 64% of their matches, scoring an average of 1.00 goal, whereas North Texas lost 40% of their last five games and conceded as many as 2.0 goals per match during that period. Portland’s overall season advantage is clear, having won 73% of their matches and averaged 2.27 points, compared with North Texas’s 36% win rate and 1.55 points. The hosts may be able to maintain the draw thanks to a high xG of 1.98 and an average of 6.0 shots on target, but Portland’s more effective defence, which keeps a clean sheet in 64% of matches, strengthens the case for a post-half-time turnaround in favour of the visitors.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| North Texas | Portland Timbers II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Portland Timbers II is 57% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - North Texas · 2.2 pts / match - Portland Timbers II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
North Texas is 30% better for: goals scored per match.
1.65 goals / match - North Texas · 1.27 goals / match - Portland Timbers II
Portland Timbers II is 38% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.5 goals / match - North Texas · 1.09 goals / match - Portland Timbers II
North Texas scores in 70% of matches (14 of 20 matches), while Portland Timbers II keeps a clean sheet in 55% (12 of 22 matches).
Portland Timbers II scores in 73% of matches (16 of 22 matches), while North Texas keeps a clean sheet in 15% (3 of 20 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - North Texas
Over / Under - Portland Timbers II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
North Texas is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.35 pts / match - North Texas · 1.05 pts / match - Portland Timbers II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
North Texas - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Portland Timbers II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -5 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
North Texas
Portland Timbers II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).
Teams vs league
| North Texas | Liga | Portland Timbers II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 3.15 | 3.25 | ▼ 2.36 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 55% | 61% | ▼ 36% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 55% | 66% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 15% | 22% | ▲ 55% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 60% | 76% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | • 85% | 84% | ▼ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): North Texas 1 - 1 - 0 Portland Timbers II. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of North Texas vs Portland Timbers II?
The MLS Next Pro match finished North Texas 0:3 Portland Timbers II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between North Texas and Portland Timbers II?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches North Texas won 1, Portland Timbers II won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before North Texas vs Portland Timbers II?
North Texas score 1.65 goals per game on average and Portland Timbers II 1.27. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.25 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 55% of North Texas's matches and 36% of Portland Timbers II's.
What form are North Texas and Portland Timbers II in?
Over the last 5 games North Texas have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Portland Timbers II 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for North Texas vs Portland Timbers II?
The statistical background for North Texas vs Portland Timbers II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


