Norwich City vs Queens Park Rangers: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Norwich City played Queens Park Rangers in Championship (England). The match was played on 29 November 2025. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Norwich City: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Queens Park Rangers: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Norwich City scores 0.94 and concedes 1.65 goals per match. Queens Park Rangers scores 1.24 and concedes 1.47. League average: 2.57 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Norwich City 71%, Queens Park Rangers 65%. Over 2.5: Norwich City 47%, Queens Park Rangers 53%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Queens Park Rangers has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.33. Norwich City: 12.2 shots per match, Queens Park Rangers: 13.7.

Match halves

Norwich City: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.35. Queens Park Rangers: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.76.

Goals by minute

Norwich City: 31-45+ (5 goals). Queens Park Rangers: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Championship: 2.57 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

3 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
17Shots12
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
6Shots on target5
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
1.78xG1.44
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
9Corners6
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
40Dangerous attacks46
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
4Fouls14
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
2Cards2
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
0.94Goals scored / match1.24
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
1.65Goals conceded / match1.47
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
53%Average possession48%
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
3.82Shots on target / match3.94
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.24Shots per match13.71
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
3.82Shots on target3.94
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
7.7%Shot conversion9%
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
53%Possession48%
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
1.33xG for1.48
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
1.58xG against1.35
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers

Shooting quality

Norwich City: BalancedQueens Park Rangers: Balanced
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
Accuracy (shots on target)31%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Queens Park Rangers is 250% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - Norwich City · 1.4 pts / match - Queens Park Rangers

Norwich City
LDLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
12% W24% D65% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-4-11
0.59 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-7
Last 5 at home
0-1-4
LLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Queens Park Rangers
LLDWW
Season result split
41% W24% D35% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-6
1.47 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-2-3
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WWLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.69Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Queens Park Rangers is 32% better for: goals scored per match.

0.94 goals / match - Norwich City · 1.24 goals / match - Queens Park Rangers

Queens Park Rangers is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.65 goals / match - Norwich City · 1.47 goals / match - Queens Park Rangers

Norwich City scoring profile: very strong

Norwich City scores in 76% of matches (13 of 17 matches), while Queens Park Rangers keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).

Queens Park Rangers scoring profile: very strong

Queens Park Rangers scores in 82% of matches (14 of 17 matches), while Norwich City keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 17 matches).

16Goals scored (season)21
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
28Goals conceded (season)25
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
2.59Average goals in match2.71
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
4Goals scored (last 5)6
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
10Goals conceded (last 5)8
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal82%
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
18%2 goals24%
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
0%3 goals18%
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
0%4 goals0%
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers

How often they concede at least...

94%1 goal71%
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
47%2 goals35%
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
18%3 goals12%
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
6%4 goals12%
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

65%
Queens Park Rangers - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 17 matches
57%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time18%
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
0%BTTS in both halves6%
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
12%Scored in both halves18%
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS53%
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
80%BTTS - last 560%
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers

2nd half

94%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
24%Min. 2 goals after half-time41%
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Norwich City is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.41 pts / match - Norwich City · 1.12 pts / match - Queens Park Rangers

Norwich City - half-time state
35% leading35% draw29% trailing
Queens Park Rangers - half-time state
24% leading41% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.41Points per match (1st half)1.12
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.47
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
0.59Goals conceded (1st half)0.82
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
1.18Average goals (1st half)1.29
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
65%Clean sheet before half-time53%
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
47%No goal before half-time59%
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers

After half-time (2nd half)

0.59Points per match (2nd half)1.59
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
0.35Goals scored (2nd half)0.76
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
1.06Goals conceded (2nd half)0.65
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
1.41Average goals (2nd half)1.41
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
24%Clean sheet after half-time59%
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers
65%No goal after half-time41%
Norwich CityQueens Park Rangers

Norwich City - second-half results

18% W6% D76% L
24
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.41
PPG before half-time
Lead holding34%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 12%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Queens Park Rangers - second-half results

41% W35% D24% L
19
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.12
PPG before half-time
Lead holding171%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Norwich City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.60
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Queens Park Rangers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.41.2
Average goals in match0.82.0
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Norwich City
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
3
2
16-30
5
5
31-45
1
8
46-60
2
3
61-75
3
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Queens Park Rangers
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
2
5
16-30
5
6
31-45
2
7
46-60
5
4
61-75
6
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.65
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
68%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Norwich City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.46
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.39
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
133%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Queens Park Rangers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
100%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
111%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).

Teams vs league

Norwich CityLigaQueens Park Rangers
Average goals in match 2.592.57 2.71
Both teams scored 71%57% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%50% 53%
Clean sheets 6%25% 29%
Goal before half-time 71%74% 71%
Goal after half-time 94%75% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.57
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.33
Home goals / match
1.24
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+7%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Queens Park RangersGoalRumarn BurrellAssist: Sam Field
  2. Queens Park RangersGoalAmadou Salif Mbengue
  3. Norwich CityGoalForson AmankwahAssist: Joshua Sargent
  4. Norwich CitySubstitutionOn: Shane Patrick Michael DuffyOff: Jack William Stacey
  5. Queens Park RangersYellow cardRumarn Burrell
  6. Queens Park RangersSubstitutionOn: Isaac HaydenOff: Jonathan Varane
  7. Queens Park RangersSubstitutionOn: Kieran MorganOff: Amadou Salif Mbengue
  8. Norwich CityYellow cardKenny Mclean
  9. Norwich CityYellow cardShane Patrick Michael Duffy
  10. Queens Park RangersYellow cardPaul Patrick Smyth

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Norwich City vs Queens Park Rangers?

The Championship match finished Norwich City 3:1 Queens Park Rangers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Norwich City vs Queens Park Rangers?

Norwich City score 0.94 goals per game on average and Queens Park Rangers 1.24. The Championship average is 2.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 71% of Norwich City's matches and 65% of Queens Park Rangers's.

What form are Norwich City and Queens Park Rangers in?

Over the last 5 games Norwich City have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Queens Park Rangers 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Norwich City vs Queens Park Rangers?

The statistical background for Norwich City vs Queens Park Rangers — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.