Nottingham Forest vs Wolverhampton Wanderers: match statistics
Nottingham Forest presents a clear advantage over Wolverhampton Wanderers in this clash. The hosts hold a 25% home win record, while the guests have not won a single away match this season (0% Win%). Wolverhampton has a catastrophic away goal difference of -15 and averages just 0.42 goals per match, failing to keep a single clean sheet. Forest possesses better xG (1.57 vs 1.01) and higher shot efficiency, suggesting superior quality in chance creation. The form of both teams in the last five matches is similar, but the home advantage and clearly better offensive and defensive statistics of the hosts argue for their victory.
Nottingham Forest vs Wolverhampton Wanderers: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Nottingham Forest played Wolverhampton Wanderers in Premier League (England). The match was played on 11 February 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Nottingham Forest: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Wolverhampton Wanderers: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Nottingham Forest scores 1.00 and concedes 1.52 goals per match. Wolverhampton Wanderers scores 0.64 and concedes 1.92. League average: 2.80 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Nottingham Forest 40%, Wolverhampton Wanderers 44%. Over 2.5: Nottingham Forest 52%, Wolverhampton Wanderers 44%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots and style
Nottingham Forest has higher xG: 1.41 vs 1.12. Nottingham Forest: 11.9 shots per match, Wolverhampton Wanderers: 9.4.
Match halves
Nottingham Forest: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.64. Wolverhampton Wanderers: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 0.24.
Goals by minute
Nottingham Forest: 46-60 (7 goals). Wolverhampton Wanderers: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Premier League: 2.80 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Nottingham Forest presents a clear advantage over Wolverhampton Wanderers in this clash. The hosts hold a 25% home win record, while the guests have not won a single away match this season (0% Win%). Wolverhampton has a catastrophic away goal difference of -15 and averages just 0.42 goals per match, failing to keep a single clean sheet. Forest possesses better xG (1.57 vs 1.01) and higher shot efficiency, suggesting superior quality in chance creation. The form of both teams in the last five matches is similar, but the home advantage and clearly better offensive and defensive statistics of the hosts argue for their victory.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Nottingham Forest | Wolverhampton Wanderers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.20 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Nottingham Forest is 300% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Nottingham Forest · 0.4 pts / match - Wolverhampton Wanderers
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Nottingham Forest is 56% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Nottingham Forest · 0.64 goals / match - Wolverhampton Wanderers
Nottingham Forest is 26% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.52 goals / match - Nottingham Forest · 1.92 goals / match - Wolverhampton Wanderers
Nottingham Forest scores in 56% of matches (14 of 25 matches), while Wolverhampton Wanderers keeps a clean sheet in 8% (2 of 25 matches).
Wolverhampton Wanderers scores in 48% of matches (12 of 25 matches), while Nottingham Forest keeps a clean sheet in 20% (5 of 25 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Nottingham Forest
Over / Under - Wolverhampton Wanderers
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Nottingham Forest is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.84 pts / match - Nottingham Forest · 0.68 pts / match - Wolverhampton Wanderers
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Nottingham Forest - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Wolverhampton Wanderers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 4%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -7 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Nottingham Forest
Wolverhampton Wanderers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Nottingham Forest | Liga | Wolverhampton Wanderers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.52 | 2.80 | ▼ 2.56 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 56% | ▼ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 52% | 55% | ▼ 44% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 25% | ▼ 8% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 76% | 73% | ▼ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 76% | 81% | ▼ 72% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Nottingham Forest 1 - 0 - 0 Wolverhampton Wanderers. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Nottingham Forest vs Wolverhampton Wanderers?
The Premier League match finished Nottingham Forest 0:0 Wolverhampton Wanderers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Nottingham Forest vs Wolverhampton Wanderers?
Nottingham Forest score 1.00 goals per game on average and Wolverhampton Wanderers 0.64. The Premier League average is 2.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Nottingham Forest's matches and 44% of Wolverhampton Wanderers's.
What form are Nottingham Forest and Wolverhampton Wanderers in?
Over the last 5 games Nottingham Forest have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Wolverhampton Wanderers 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nottingham Forest vs Wolverhampton Wanderers?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Nottingham Forest vs Wolverhampton Wanderers: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.