Ntugasaze vs Express: match statistics
Ntugasaze vs Express: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Ntugasaze played Express in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match was played on 1 November 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Ntugasaze: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Express: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Ntugasaze scores 0.57 and concedes 2.57 goals per match. Express scores 0.75 and concedes 1.13. League average: 2.19 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Ntugasaze 43%, Express 38%. Over 2.5: Ntugasaze 57%, Express 25%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 41%.
xG, shots and style
Express has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.33. Ntugasaze: 9.9 shots per match, Express: 8.4.
Match halves
Ntugasaze: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.14. Express: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.50.
Goals by minute
Ntugasaze: 0-15 (1 goals). Express: 46-60 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Uganda Premier League: 2.19 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 41%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Ntugasaze hold a slight advantage thanks to home form, where they average 0.67 goals, while Express have yet to score away from home. However, the visitors create chances worth an average xG of 1.57 per away match, so their lack of goals may not continue. The hosts also have problems converting chances: despite an xG of 1.51, they score just 0.67 goals at home, and have netted 3 times in their last five matches. Their defence is a greater concern, having conceded 14 goals in those five games, compared with 6 for Express. Despite these reservations, Express’s failure to score away from home supports a cautious lean towards a home win, although a draw remains a realistic outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal in favor of BTTS - No comes from Express’s away matches: the team averaged 0.0 goals and failed to score in 100% of those games. However, the visitors could still break their scoring drought, having averaged 0.8 goals over their last 5 matches with an xG of 1.33, while Ntugasaze conceded an average of 2.8 goals. The hosts average 1.5 goals at home, but their tally has dropped to 0.6 goals per match across their last 5 games. Although BTTS - Yes landed in 75% of Ntugasaze’s home matches, Express’s away rate is 0%, compared with a league average of 38%. Therefore, the more likely scenario is that at least one team fails to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest pick is Under 3.5 goals: all of Express’s away matches so far and 75% of Ntugasaze’s home matches have finished with no more than three goals. Express are yet to score away from home, although they have averaged 0.8 goals across their last five matches overall, so their scoring cannot be ruled out entirely. Ntugasaze have conceded an average of 2.8 goals recently, but the teams’ average xG—1.21 for the hosts and 1.57 for the visitors—suggests a more balanced attacking outlook than the results alone indicate. The projected total of 2.3 goals is close to the league average of 2.24, leaving a clearer margin for Under 3.5 goals than for lower lines.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time is likely, as both teams were level at the break in 2 of the 4 matches considered, and neither side led at half-time in any of them. Express have yet to score in away matches, while Ntugasaze average 1.5 goals per home game, tilting the full-time assessment in favour of the hosts. A post-half-time decision is also supported by Ntugasaze averaging 1.0 goal at home in the second half without conceding, while Express concede an average of 0.5 goals in the second half away from home. The strongest individual scenario is therefore a half-time draw followed by a home win, although the edge is not substantial. Caution is warranted given Ntugasaze’s last five matches: they lost four and failed to score a second-half goal in any of them, making a full-time draw a significant alternative.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Ntugasaze | Express | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.17 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.19 | 0.22 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Express is 32% better for: goals scored per match.
0.57 goals / match - Ntugasaze · 0.75 goals / match - Express
Express is 127% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.57 goals / match - Ntugasaze · 1.13 goals / match - Express
Ntugasaze scores in 57% of matches (4 of 7 matches), while Express keeps a clean sheet in 25% (2 of 8 matches).
Express scores in 50% of matches (4 of 8 matches), while Ntugasaze keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ntugasaze
Over / Under - Express
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Ntugasaze is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.57 pts / match - Ntugasaze · 0.5 pts / match - Express
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ntugasaze - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 14%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Express - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -8 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Ntugasaze
Express
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Ntugasaze | Liga | Express | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.14 | 2.19 | ▼ 1.88 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 43% | 40% | ▼ 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 57% | 41% | ▼ 25% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 38% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 86% | 62% | • 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 71% | 67% | ▼ 63% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Ntugasaze vs Express?
The Uganda Premier League match finished Ntugasaze 1:1 Express. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Ntugasaze vs Express?
Ntugasaze score 0.57 goals per game on average and Express 0.75. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.19 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Ntugasaze's matches and 38% of Express's.
What form are Ntugasaze and Express in?
Over the last 5 games Ntugasaze have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Express 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ntugasaze vs Express?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Ntugasaze vs Express: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


