Nueva Chicago vs All Boys: match statistics
Nueva Chicago vs All Boys: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Nueva Chicago played All Boys in Prim B Nacional (Argentina). The match was played on 29 March 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Nueva Chicago: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. All Boys: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Nueva Chicago scores 1.20 and concedes 0.60 goals per match. All Boys scores 0.80 and concedes 0.80. League average: 1.81 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Nueva Chicago 20%, All Boys 40%. Over 2.5: Nueva Chicago 20%, All Boys 40%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 31%.
xG, shots and style
All Boys has higher xG: 1.59 vs 0.98. Nueva Chicago: 8.0 shots per match, All Boys: 13.8.
Match halves
Nueva Chicago: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.80. All Boys: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.40.
Goals by minute
Nueva Chicago: 61-75 (3 goals). All Boys: 16-30 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Prim B Nacional: 1.81 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 31%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Nueva Chicago have a clear advantage, especially at home — 1.5 goals per match, only 0.5 GA and 50% clean sheets. Their recent form is better (PPG 2, wdwlw) than All Boys (PPG 1.4, variable recent form), while visitors have lost all away matches in stats (Win% 0, Loss% 100). All Boys possess higher possession (55%) and more overall shots but very low conversion (6%) and only 0.5 goals away, limiting their threat. xG difference is small, but hosts' efficiency and defence point to a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Stats point toward no BTTS. Nueva Chicago record high CS% (67%) and low season conceded 0.33, indicating defensive solidity. League CS 76% and low average goals (1.86) favor matches without mutual scoring. All Boys show poor finishing (seasonScoredAVG 0.5, last5 0.8) and will likely struggle to breach the home defence. Season BTTS history (home 33% season, L5 20%) supports a confident NO pick. Recommendation: BTTS = NO.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG model shows 1.59 xG for Nueva Chicago and 0.97 xG for All Boys, totaling ~2.56 expected goals. Nueva Chicago creates significantly more shots and xG (higher attacking efficiency), while All Boys concedes more on average, increasing goal probability. Although season Over2.5 rates are moderate, the combination of higher home offensive xG and away defensive susceptibility favors at least 2 goals. High home CS% indicates some disparity but not enough to reduce Over1.5 chances. Strongest and most certain signal: Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Data clearly show a high share of draws at Half-Time (drawingAtHTPercentage 100% for both teams and low HT goal averages), strongly favoring a drawn HT. Nueva Chicago have better attacking metrics (xG 1.89 vs 1.14) and a clear second-half advantage (AVG_2hg_home 0.67, scored_2hg_avg_home 0.67), suggesting decisive goals come after the break. All Boys perform poorly away and have high conceded averages in the second half (conceded_2hg_avg_away 1.0), increasing the probability of a home comeback after an HT draw. Considering low first-half scoring and Nueva Chicago’s second-half edge, the most likely and strongest signal is X/1 (HT draw, FT home win).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Nueva Chicago | All Boys | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 45% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.18 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Nueva Chicago is 43% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Nueva Chicago · 1.4 pts / match - All Boys
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Nueva Chicago is 50% better for: goals scored per match.
1.2 goals / match - Nueva Chicago · 0.8 goals / match - All Boys
Nueva Chicago is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.6 goals / match - Nueva Chicago · 0.8 goals / match - All Boys
Nueva Chicago scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while All Boys keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 matches).
All Boys scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Nueva Chicago keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Nueva Chicago
Over / Under - All Boys
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Nueva Chicago is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.2 pts / match - Nueva Chicago · 1 pts / match - All Boys
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Nueva Chicago - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
All Boys - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Nueva Chicago
All Boys
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Prim B Nacional).
Teams vs league
| Nueva Chicago | Liga | All Boys | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 1.80 | 1.81 | ▼ 1.60 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 20% | 40% | • 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 20% | 31% | ▲ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 60% | 39% | • 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 40% | 61% | ▼ 40% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 60% | 70% | ▲ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Nueva Chicago vs All Boys?
The Prim B Nacional match finished Nueva Chicago 0:0 All Boys. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Nueva Chicago vs All Boys?
Nueva Chicago score 1.20 goals per game on average and All Boys 0.80. The Prim B Nacional average is 1.81 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 31% of games. Both teams score in 20% of Nueva Chicago's matches and 40% of All Boys's.
What form are Nueva Chicago and All Boys in?
Over the last 5 games Nueva Chicago have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and All Boys 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nueva Chicago vs All Boys?
The statistical background for Nueva Chicago vs All Boys — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.