United States - USL League OneMCU ParkData current as of 07 September 2026

NY Cosmos vs Athletic Club Boise: match statistics

NY Cosmos vs Athletic Club Boise: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

NY Cosmos played Athletic Club Boise in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 25 July 2026. Venue: MCU Park. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

NY Cosmos: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Athletic Club Boise: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

NY Cosmos scores 1.06 and concedes 2.25 goals per match. Athletic Club Boise scores 1.47 and concedes 1.41. League average: 2.86 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: NY Cosmos 63%, Athletic Club Boise 59%. Over 2.5: NY Cosmos 81%, Athletic Club Boise 59%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 60%.

xG, shots and style

Athletic Club Boise has higher xG: 1.60 vs 1.50. NY Cosmos: 12.3 shots per match, Athletic Club Boise: 13.7.

Match halves

NY Cosmos: half-time lead 6%, second-half goals 0.81. Athletic Club Boise: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.88.

Goals by minute

NY Cosmos: 46-60 (7 goals). Athletic Club Boise: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL League One: 2.86 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 60%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a win for Athletic Club Boise (2) — the visitors have a clear seasonal and form advantage, with 8 wins this season versus 3 for the hosts and occupying 6th vs 17th (NY Cosmos). In the last 5 matches Athletic won 4 times, scored 7 goals and conceded 3, while Cosmos have a record of 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses with 3 scored and 7 conceded. Situation metrics show Cosmos have a slightly higher average xG in home matches (1.59) and more shots on target per game on average (4.75), but that does not translate into recent efficiency (only 3 goals in 5 games and 25% of matches without scoring). Defensively the hosts perform better seasonally (on average 1.5 goals conceded per home game vs Athletic’s 1.86 conceded away), yet current form and superior results for the visitors (an average of 2.4 points per game in the last 5 vs 1.0 for Cosmos) favor the away side.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams show high season BTTS rates: NY Cosmos 60% and Athletic Club Boise 57%, both above the league average of 55%. Clean sheets are rare — hosts have 30% clean sheets, visitors 29%, while season average goals conceded are 1.1 (hosts) and 1.86 (guests), which increases the likelihood of both teams scoring. Chance metrics corroborate this: hosts have xG 1.73 and average 15 shots (4.6 on target) against opponents allowing 1.80 xG, while guests generate xG 1.41 with 11.7 shots (3.7 on target) versus hosts allowing 1.11 xG. Although BTTS percentage in the last 5 matches dropped to 40% for both teams, NY Cosmos in those five fixtures scored only 3 and conceded 7 (avg. 0.6–1.4), while Boise scored 7 and conceded 3 (avg. 1.4–0.6), which still favors the scenario that both sides will find the net. In summary, seasons of 60%/57%, low 30%/29% clean sheets and xG and shots comparisons give a strong signal for BTTS; I assess probability of “Yes” at 75% versus 25% for “No.”

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

A model combining xG and seasonal averages forecasts 1.75 goals for NY Cosmos and 1.23 for Athletic Club Boise, totaling 2.98 goals. NY Cosmos score on average 1.6 goals with an xG of 1.73, while Athletic Boise has an attacking xG of 1.41 and concedes 1.86 goals on average (xG against 1.8) — this mix increases expectations for the home side. This season both teams have had matches with at least one goal in 100% of cases, with Cosmos scoring in 90% and Boise in 86% of fixtures; additionally BTTS is 60% (Cosmos) vs 57% (Boise), which supports two or more goals in the match. Seasonal Over 1.5 rates are 90% for the home team and 57% for the away team, and Over 2.5 occurs for Cosmos in 60% and league-wide 57%, so Over 2.5 is also likely (~65%). The strongest and safest signal from the data remains Over on the 1.5 line, hence the recommendation: Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Seasonal statistics favor NY Cosmos: at home they win 60% of matches, have an average xG of 1.73 versus Athletic's 1.41 and score 1.6 goals per game on average versus 1.29 for the opponents. At half-time Cosmos lead in 40% of matches and average 0.8 goals scored and 0.3 conceded by the break, while Athletic average 0.29 scored and 0.57 conceded, which suggests a typical 1-0 lead at half-time. The second half must be taken into account: Athletic score an average of 1.0 goal after the break versus 0.8 for the hosts, and both teams have 100% of matches with over 0.5 goals in the second half, so scenarios of equalization or a turnaround in the second half are realistic. Accordingly, the HT/FT distribution assigns 30% to 1/1, higher weights to scenarios with an equalizer after half-time (X/1 18%, X/2 12%) and lower weights for Athletic leading at the break (2/1 6%, 2/X 4%, 2/2 10%). The strongest signal in the data is 1/1 (30%) due to the hosts' 60% home efficiency and 40% half-time leads, although it is worth noting Athletic are in better recent form over the last 5 matches (last 5: Cosmos 20% wins vs Athletic 80%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
12Shots9
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
5Shots on target3
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
1.34xG1.08
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
1Corners3
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
31Dangerous attacks41
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
15Fouls13
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
2Cards1
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
1.06Goals scored / match1.47
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
2.25Goals conceded / match1.41
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
46%Average possession55%
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
4.13Shots on target / match4.24
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.31Shots per match13.65
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
4.13Shots on target4.24
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
8.6%Shot conversion10.8%
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
46%Possession55%
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
1.5xG for1.6
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
1.71xG against1.39
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise

Shooting quality

NY Cosmos: BalancedAthletic Club Boise: Balanced
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
Accuracy (shots on target)34%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Athletic Club Boise is 125% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - NY Cosmos · 1.8 pts / match - Athletic Club Boise

NY Cosmos
LLWDL
Season result split
19% W13% R69% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-11
0.69 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-3
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DLLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.53Opponent xG: 1.69BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%
Athletic Club Boise
LWLWW
Season result split
47% W18% R35% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-6
1.59 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-3
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.53Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Athletic Club Boise is 39% better for: goals scored per match.

1.06 goals / match - NY Cosmos · 1.47 goals / match - Athletic Club Boise

Athletic Club Boise is 60% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.25 goals / match - NY Cosmos · 1.41 goals / match - Athletic Club Boise

NY Cosmos scoring profile: very strong

NY Cosmos scores in 75% of matches (12 of 16 matches), while Athletic Club Boise keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).

Athletic Club Boise scoring profile: very strong

Athletic Club Boise scores in 88% of matches (15 of 17 matches), while NY Cosmos keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 matches).

17Goals scored (season)25
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
36Goals conceded (season)24
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
3.31Average goals in match2.88
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
2Goals scored (last 5)6
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
9Goals conceded (last 5)8
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal88%
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
25%2 goals47%
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
6%3 goals6%
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
0%4 goals6%
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal71%
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
81%2 goals41%
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
56%3 goals18%
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
6%4 goals6%
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

59%
Athletic Club Boise - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 17 matches
55%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time18%
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
6%BTTS in both halves12%
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
19%Scored in both halves24%
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise

BTTS and goal count

63%Min. 3 goals and BTTS53%
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
19%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
20%BTTS - last 560%
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise

2nd half

94%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
69%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Athletic Club Boise is 97% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.63 pts / match - NY Cosmos · 1.24 pts / match - Athletic Club Boise

NY Cosmos - half-time state
6% leading44% draw50% trailing
Athletic Club Boise - half-time state
24% leading53% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.63Points per match (1st half)1.24
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
0.25Goals scored (1st half)0.59
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
1.13Goals conceded (1st half)0.41
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
1.38Average goals (1st half)1
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
38%Clean sheet before half-time59%
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
81%No goal before half-time59%
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise

After half-time (2nd half)

1.19Points per match (2nd half)1.47
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
0.81Goals scored (2nd half)0.88
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
1.13Goals conceded (2nd half)1
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
1.94Average goals (2nd half)1.88
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
38%Clean sheet after half-time35%
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise
25%No goal after half-time29%
NY CosmosAthletic Club Boise

NY Cosmos - second-half results

31% W25% R44% P
10
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-14
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.63
PPG before half-time
Lead holding317%

Leads at half-time in 6% of matches and wins 19%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Athletic Club Boise - second-half results

47% W6% R47% P
21
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding196%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

NY Cosmos - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.00
Goals scored / match0.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-4-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Athletic Club Boise - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.80
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.41.2
Average goals in match0.62.2
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

NY Cosmos
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
3
6
16-30
0
7
31-45
7
7
46-60
1
5
61-75
5
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Athletic Club Boise
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
4
4
16-30
2
2
31-45
4
6
46-60
5
4
61-75
6
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.09
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

NY Cosmos

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.98
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
60%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
205%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Athletic Club Boise

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
134%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.21
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).

Teams vs league

NY CosmosLigaAthletic Club Boise
Average goals in match 3.312.86 2.88
Both teams scored 63%55% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 81%60% 59%
Clean sheets 19%26% 29%
Goal before half-time 69%72% 65%
Goal after half-time 94%80% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.86
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.76
Home goals / match
1.10
Away goals / match
+60%
Home attack advantage
+37%
Home defence advantage
+31%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. NY CosmosYellow cardChevone Omelli Marsh
  2. NY CosmosSubstitutionOn: Michael ChilakaOff: William Noecker
  3. NY CosmosYellow cardSergio Chavez
  4. Athletic Club BoiseGoalBlake Bodily
  5. Athletic Club BoiseGoalJacob CrullAssist: Thomas Olivier Amang
  6. NY CosmosSubstitutionOn: Tino PuentesOff: Massimo Morabito
  7. Athletic Club BoiseYellow cardDominic Gasso
  8. Athletic Club BoiseSubstitutionOn: Charlie AdamsOff: Dominic Gasso
  9. Athletic Club BoiseSubstitutionOn: Omar YehyaOff: Tumi Moshobane
  10. Athletic Club BoiseSubstitutionOn: Moussa NdiayeOff: Nick Moon

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of NY Cosmos vs Athletic Club Boise?

The USL League One match finished NY Cosmos 1:2 Athletic Club Boise. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before NY Cosmos vs Athletic Club Boise?

NY Cosmos score 1.06 goals per game on average and Athletic Club Boise 1.47. The USL League One average is 2.86 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 63% of NY Cosmos's matches and 59% of Athletic Club Boise's.

What form are NY Cosmos and Athletic Club Boise in?

Over the last 5 games NY Cosmos have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Athletic Club Boise 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for NY Cosmos vs Athletic Club Boise?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for NY Cosmos vs Athletic Club Boise: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.