NY Cosmos vs Athletic Club Boise: match statistics
NY Cosmos vs Athletic Club Boise: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
NY Cosmos played Athletic Club Boise in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 25 July 2026. Venue: MCU Park. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
NY Cosmos: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Athletic Club Boise: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
NY Cosmos scores 1.06 and concedes 2.25 goals per match. Athletic Club Boise scores 1.47 and concedes 1.41. League average: 2.86 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: NY Cosmos 63%, Athletic Club Boise 59%. Over 2.5: NY Cosmos 81%, Athletic Club Boise 59%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 60%.
xG, shots and style
Athletic Club Boise has higher xG: 1.60 vs 1.50. NY Cosmos: 12.3 shots per match, Athletic Club Boise: 13.7.
Match halves
NY Cosmos: half-time lead 6%, second-half goals 0.81. Athletic Club Boise: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.88.
Goals by minute
NY Cosmos: 46-60 (7 goals). Athletic Club Boise: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL League One: 2.86 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 60%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a win for Athletic Club Boise (2) — the visitors have a clear seasonal and form advantage, with 8 wins this season versus 3 for the hosts and occupying 6th vs 17th (NY Cosmos). In the last 5 matches Athletic won 4 times, scored 7 goals and conceded 3, while Cosmos have a record of 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses with 3 scored and 7 conceded. Situation metrics show Cosmos have a slightly higher average xG in home matches (1.59) and more shots on target per game on average (4.75), but that does not translate into recent efficiency (only 3 goals in 5 games and 25% of matches without scoring). Defensively the hosts perform better seasonally (on average 1.5 goals conceded per home game vs Athletic’s 1.86 conceded away), yet current form and superior results for the visitors (an average of 2.4 points per game in the last 5 vs 1.0 for Cosmos) favor the away side.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams show high season BTTS rates: NY Cosmos 60% and Athletic Club Boise 57%, both above the league average of 55%. Clean sheets are rare — hosts have 30% clean sheets, visitors 29%, while season average goals conceded are 1.1 (hosts) and 1.86 (guests), which increases the likelihood of both teams scoring. Chance metrics corroborate this: hosts have xG 1.73 and average 15 shots (4.6 on target) against opponents allowing 1.80 xG, while guests generate xG 1.41 with 11.7 shots (3.7 on target) versus hosts allowing 1.11 xG. Although BTTS percentage in the last 5 matches dropped to 40% for both teams, NY Cosmos in those five fixtures scored only 3 and conceded 7 (avg. 0.6–1.4), while Boise scored 7 and conceded 3 (avg. 1.4–0.6), which still favors the scenario that both sides will find the net. In summary, seasons of 60%/57%, low 30%/29% clean sheets and xG and shots comparisons give a strong signal for BTTS; I assess probability of “Yes” at 75% versus 25% for “No.”
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
A model combining xG and seasonal averages forecasts 1.75 goals for NY Cosmos and 1.23 for Athletic Club Boise, totaling 2.98 goals. NY Cosmos score on average 1.6 goals with an xG of 1.73, while Athletic Boise has an attacking xG of 1.41 and concedes 1.86 goals on average (xG against 1.8) — this mix increases expectations for the home side. This season both teams have had matches with at least one goal in 100% of cases, with Cosmos scoring in 90% and Boise in 86% of fixtures; additionally BTTS is 60% (Cosmos) vs 57% (Boise), which supports two or more goals in the match. Seasonal Over 1.5 rates are 90% for the home team and 57% for the away team, and Over 2.5 occurs for Cosmos in 60% and league-wide 57%, so Over 2.5 is also likely (~65%). The strongest and safest signal from the data remains Over on the 1.5 line, hence the recommendation: Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Seasonal statistics favor NY Cosmos: at home they win 60% of matches, have an average xG of 1.73 versus Athletic's 1.41 and score 1.6 goals per game on average versus 1.29 for the opponents. At half-time Cosmos lead in 40% of matches and average 0.8 goals scored and 0.3 conceded by the break, while Athletic average 0.29 scored and 0.57 conceded, which suggests a typical 1-0 lead at half-time. The second half must be taken into account: Athletic score an average of 1.0 goal after the break versus 0.8 for the hosts, and both teams have 100% of matches with over 0.5 goals in the second half, so scenarios of equalization or a turnaround in the second half are realistic. Accordingly, the HT/FT distribution assigns 30% to 1/1, higher weights to scenarios with an equalizer after half-time (X/1 18%, X/2 12%) and lower weights for Athletic leading at the break (2/1 6%, 2/X 4%, 2/2 10%). The strongest signal in the data is 1/1 (30%) due to the hosts' 60% home efficiency and 40% half-time leads, although it is worth noting Athletic are in better recent form over the last 5 matches (last 5: Cosmos 20% wins vs Athletic 80%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| NY Cosmos | Athletic Club Boise | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Athletic Club Boise is 125% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - NY Cosmos · 1.8 pts / match - Athletic Club Boise
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Athletic Club Boise is 39% better for: goals scored per match.
1.06 goals / match - NY Cosmos · 1.47 goals / match - Athletic Club Boise
Athletic Club Boise is 60% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.25 goals / match - NY Cosmos · 1.41 goals / match - Athletic Club Boise
NY Cosmos scores in 75% of matches (12 of 16 matches), while Athletic Club Boise keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).
Athletic Club Boise scores in 88% of matches (15 of 17 matches), while NY Cosmos keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - NY Cosmos
Over / Under - Athletic Club Boise
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Athletic Club Boise is 97% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.63 pts / match - NY Cosmos · 1.24 pts / match - Athletic Club Boise
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
NY Cosmos - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 6% of matches and wins 19%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Athletic Club Boise - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
NY Cosmos
Athletic Club Boise
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).
Teams vs league
| NY Cosmos | Liga | Athletic Club Boise | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.31 | 2.86 | • 2.88 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 55% | ▲ 59% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 81% | 60% | • 59% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 26% | ▲ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 69% | 72% | ▼ 65% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 94% | 80% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of NY Cosmos vs Athletic Club Boise?
The USL League One match finished NY Cosmos 1:2 Athletic Club Boise. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before NY Cosmos vs Athletic Club Boise?
NY Cosmos score 1.06 goals per game on average and Athletic Club Boise 1.47. The USL League One average is 2.86 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 63% of NY Cosmos's matches and 59% of Athletic Club Boise's.
What form are NY Cosmos and Athletic Club Boise in?
Over the last 5 games NY Cosmos have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Athletic Club Boise 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for NY Cosmos vs Athletic Club Boise?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for NY Cosmos vs Athletic Club Boise: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


