United States - USL League OneMCU ParkData current as of 17 October 2026

NY Cosmos vs Richmond Kickers: match statistics

NY Cosmos crest
NY Cosmos
3 : 2half-time 2:1
Richmond Kickers crest
Richmond Kickers

NY Cosmos vs Richmond Kickers: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

NY Cosmos played Richmond Kickers in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 27 September 2026. Venue: MCU Park. Final score: 3:2.

Current form

NY Cosmos: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Richmond Kickers: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

NY Cosmos scores 1.23 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. Richmond Kickers scores 0.96 and concedes 2.04. League average: 2.97 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: NY Cosmos 65%, Richmond Kickers 54%. Over 2.5: NY Cosmos 73%, Richmond Kickers 54%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 60%.

xG, shots and style

NY Cosmos has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.42. NY Cosmos: 12.9 shots per match, Richmond Kickers: 12.4.

Match halves

NY Cosmos: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.88. Richmond Kickers: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.46.

Goals by minute

NY Cosmos: 76-90+ (11 goals). Richmond Kickers: 0-15 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL League One: 2.97 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 60%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

NY Cosmos have a slight home advantage: they win 33% of their home fixtures, while Richmond Kickers win just 8% of their away matches and lose as many as 85%. The hosts average 1.17 goals at their own stadium with an xG of 1.66, while the visitors’ defense allows opponents an xG of 2.00 and concedes an average of 2.85 goals away from home. Richmond have scored just 2 goals in their last five matches, and fail to score in 38% of their away fixtures; Cosmos have the same issue in only 17% of their home games. Both teams are in similarly poor current form, with a record of 1 win, 1 draw, and 3 defeats in their last five matches, but the visitors have lost 13 of their last 15 away games. Cosmos’ weak defense, conceding 1.50 goals per game at home, leaves room for a closely contested match, but the data points more clearly toward a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument for BTTS - No is Richmond’s poor current attacking form, having scored just 2 goals in their last 5 matches—an average of 0.4 per game—with both teams scoring in only 20% of those fixtures. The visitors have failed to score in 38% of their matches this season, while their average xG across the last five games is just 1.00, compared with NY Cosmos’ 1.72 xG. The hosts should have a good chance of scoring, as Richmond concede an average of 2.85 goals per game and have kept a clean sheet in only 8% of their matches. Although Cosmos have conceded an average of 1.8 goals in their last five matches, both teams’ season BTTS rate stands at 54%, below the league average of 60%, reinforcing the scenario in which at least one side fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

NY Cosmos average 1.65 xG and 4.69 shots on target per match, while Richmond concede as many as 2.85 goals and 2.00 xG on average, significantly raising the hosts’ projected goal tally. However, the visitors are offensively limited: they have scored just 2 goals in their last five matches, averaging 0.4 per game, with an average xG of 1.00. Richmond have had at least three goals in 69% of their matches this season, but NY Cosmos have exceeded that line in only 38% of games, and the hosts have never conceded more than two goals in a single match. The projected total of 2.70 goals suggests a realistic chance of a 2:0, 2:1 or 1:1 result, but the visitors’ weaker recent finishing limits the likelihood of four goals. Therefore, the strongest selection is Under 3.5 goals, also supported by the fact that 85% of NY Cosmos matches have ended with a maximum of three goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

NY Cosmos possess a clear attacking edge: their average xG stands at 1.65 compared with Richmond’s 1.19, while the hosts average 4.69 shots on target per match against 2.92 for their opponents. Richmond concede an average of as many as 2.85 goals per game, including 1.62 before half-time, whereas Cosmos have taken a lead at the break in 25% of their matches, compared with just 8% for the visitors. In their last five appearances, Richmond have failed to score a single first-half goal, while Cosmos have averaged 0.60 goals in this phase. The hosts’ advantage should persist after the break, as they concede just 0.25 goals in second halves, whereas the Kickers allow opponents to score 1.23 goals. The scenario of Cosmos leading at half-time and securing a full-time victory is therefore most strongly supported by Richmond’s defensive weaknesses and limited attacking efficiency.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

62Possession (%)38
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
11Shots17
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
5Shots on target5
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
1.59xG1.95
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
6Corners5
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
74Dangerous attacks73
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
13Fouls18
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
4Cards5
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
1.23Goals scored / match0.96
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
2Goals conceded / match2.04
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
47%Average possession43%
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
4.38Shots on target / match3.81
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.92Shots per match12.38
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
4.38Shots on target3.81
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
9.5%Shot conversion7.8%
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
47%Possession43%
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
1.57xG for1.42
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
1.62xG against1.81
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers

Shooting quality

NY Cosmos: BalancedRichmond Kickers: Balanced
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
Accuracy (shots on target)34%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

NY Cosmos is 300% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - NY Cosmos · 0.2 pts / match - Richmond Kickers

NY Cosmos
DLWLL
Season result split
23% W15% D62% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-4-16
0.85 pts / match · goal difference -20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-6
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
DLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.69Opponent xG: 1.53BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
Richmond Kickers
LLDLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
19% W19% D62% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-5-16
0.77 pts / match · goal difference -28
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-11
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 2.02BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

NY Cosmos is 28% better for: goals scored per match.

1.23 goals / match - NY Cosmos · 0.96 goals / match - Richmond Kickers

NY Cosmos scoring profile: very strong

NY Cosmos scores in 81% of matches (21 of 26 matches), while Richmond Kickers keeps a clean sheet in 15% (4 of 26 matches).

Richmond Kickers scoring profile: very strong

Richmond Kickers scores in 65% of matches (17 of 26 matches), while NY Cosmos keeps a clean sheet in 19% (5 of 26 matches).

32Goals scored (season)25
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
52Goals conceded (season)53
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
3.23Average goals in match3
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
8Goals scored (last 5)5
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
9Goals conceded (last 5)12
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers

How often they score at least...

81%1 goal65%
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
27%2 goals23%
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
12%3 goals8%
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
4%4 goals0%
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal85%
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
77%2 goals58%
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
38%3 goals27%
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
4%4 goals19%
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

54%
Richmond Kickers - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.14 of 26 matches
61%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time23%
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
8%BTTS in both halves0%
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
23%Scored in both halves15%
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers

BTTS and goal count

62%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
100%BTTS - last 580%
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time85%
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
42%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers

2nd half

92%Min. 1 goal after half-time69%
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
65%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
31%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

NY Cosmos is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.77 pts / match - NY Cosmos · 0.73 pts / match - Richmond Kickers

NY Cosmos - half-time state
12% leading42% draw46% trailing
Richmond Kickers - half-time state
15% leading27% draw58% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.77Points per match (1st half)0.73
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
0.35Goals scored (1st half)0.38
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
0.92Goals conceded (1st half)1.23
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
1.27Average goals (1st half)1.62
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
42%Clean sheet before half-time31%
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
73%No goal before half-time62%
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers

After half-time (2nd half)

1.23Points per match (2nd half)1.19
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
0.88Goals scored (2nd half)0.46
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
1.08Goals conceded (2nd half)0.73
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
1.96Average goals (2nd half)1.19
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
35%Clean sheet after half-time58%
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers
23%No goal after half-time62%
NY CosmosRichmond Kickers

NY Cosmos - second-half results

31% W31% D38% L
20
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-15
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.77
PPG before half-time
Lead holding192%

Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Richmond Kickers - second-half results

27% W38% D35% L
19
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-22
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.73
PPG before half-time
Lead holding127%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 19%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

NY Cosmos - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match1.22.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Richmond Kickers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.001.60
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match2.00.4
Average goals in match2.21.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet0%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-9+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 0% draw - 100% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

NY Cosmos
ScoredConceded
1
8
0-15
4
6
16-30
4
10
31-45
9
12
46-60
3
6
61-75
11
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Richmond Kickers
ScoredConceded
7
11
0-15
2
10
16-30
4
13
31-45
6
8
46-60
3
5
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.12
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-36%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

NY Cosmos

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.72
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
164%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
34% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
34%

Richmond Kickers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.39
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.69
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.57
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
12% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 28% come in the first quarter-hour.
12%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).

Teams vs league

NY CosmosLigaRichmond Kickers
Average goals in match▲ 3.232.97• 3.00
Both teams scored▲ 65%61%▼ 54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 73%60%▼ 54%
Clean sheets▼ 19%22%▼ 15%
Goal before half-time▼ 69%74%▲ 85%
Goal after half-time▲ 92%81%▼ 69%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.97
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.76
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+44%
Home attack advantage
+31%
Home defence advantage
+24%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. NY CosmosGoalPhilip Spengler
  2. Richmond KickersYellow cardOwen O'Malley
  3. Richmond KickersSubstitutionOn: Tyler FreemanOff: Owen O'Malley
  4. Richmond KickersGoalZahir VasquezAssist: Yann Alexandre Fillion
  5. Richmond KickersYellow cardSam Layton
  6. NY CosmosYellow cardLamin Jawneh
  7. Richmond KickersYellow cardSean Paul Vinberg
  8. NY CosmosYellow cardMichael Chilaka
  9. Richmond KickersGoalSean Paul VinbergAssist: Ali Sasankhah
  10. Richmond KickersSubstitutionOn: Lucca Dourado PereiraOff: Zahir Vasquez
  11. NY CosmosYellow cardOzzie Ramos
  12. NY CosmosSubstitutionOn: Nicholas MendoncaOff: Ozzie Ramos
  13. NY CosmosSubstitutionOn: Stalyn AcostaOff: Nestor Cabrera
  14. Richmond KickersSubstitutionOn: Austin AmerOff: Nils Seufert
  15. Richmond KickersYellow cardHarold Hanson
  16. NY CosmosGoalPhilip Spengler
  17. NY CosmosYellow cardPhilip Spengler

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: NY Cosmos 0 - 0 - 1 Richmond Kickers. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of NY Cosmos vs Richmond Kickers?

The USL League One match finished NY Cosmos 3:2 Richmond Kickers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before NY Cosmos vs Richmond Kickers?

NY Cosmos score 1.23 goals per game on average and Richmond Kickers 0.96. The USL League One average is 2.97 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 65% of NY Cosmos's matches and 54% of Richmond Kickers's.

What form are NY Cosmos and Richmond Kickers in?

Over the last 5 games NY Cosmos have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Richmond Kickers 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for NY Cosmos vs Richmond Kickers?

The statistical background for NY Cosmos vs Richmond Kickers — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.