United States - USL League OneMCU ParkData current as of 07 September 2026

NY Cosmos vs Union Omaha: match statistics

NY Cosmos crest
NY Cosmos
1 : 2half-time 0:0
Union Omaha crest
Union Omaha

NY Cosmos vs Union Omaha: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

NY Cosmos played Union Omaha in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 27 May 2026. Venue: MCU Park. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

NY Cosmos: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Union Omaha: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

NY Cosmos scores 1.50 and concedes 2.50 goals per match. Union Omaha scores 1.80 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.77 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: NY Cosmos 75%, Union Omaha 60%. Over 2.5: NY Cosmos 88%, Union Omaha 60%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 57%.

xG, shots and style

Union Omaha has higher xG: 1.77 vs 1.47. NY Cosmos: 11.6 shots per match, Union Omaha: 15.1.

Match halves

NY Cosmos: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 1.00. Union Omaha: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.20.

Goals by minute

NY Cosmos: 46-60 (4 goals). Union Omaha: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL League One: 2.77 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 57%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back Union Omaha to win (2): the visitors sit 1st with a record of 7 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses this season, and a goal tally of 18 scored and 10 conceded; NY Cosmos are 15th with 2 wins, 1 draw and 5 losses and a 12–20 record. In their last 5 matches Union Omaha scored 9 goals and averaged 2 points per game, while Cosmos scored 6 goals and averaged 0.8 points per game, indicating a clear form advantage for the visitors. Still, Cosmos display home offensive traits: 2.0 goals per game, 5.5 shots on target, 19% conversion rate and 0% games without a goal with xG 1.55; visitors away average 1.5 goals, 3.75 shots on target, 13% conversion and xG 1.38. The key difference is defense — Union Omaha have conceded only 10 goals this season and 1.25 goals on average away versus Cosmos’ 20 goals and 1.75 conceded per game, and they also have markedly better points average and form (position 1 vs 15). Given the visitors’ defensive stability and superior form (7 wins vs 2), I assign 60% to Union Omaha win, 20% to draw and 20% to NY Cosmos win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The "both teams to score" scenario appears more likely based on seasonal and recent data – Union Omaha has a seasonal BTTS of 75% and 0% clean sheets, while NY Cosmos have a seasonal BTTS of 50%, with BTTS of 60% in the last 5 matches for both teams. A key signal is Cosmos' defense: they conceded 14 goals in the last 5 matches (2.8 per game) while scoring 6 (1.2 per game), whereas Omaha scored 9 in that period (1.8 per game) and conceded on average 1.6. Looking at xG, in the last 5 matches Cosmos have an attacking xG of 1.52 versus defensive xG of 1.74 (deficit 0.22), while Omaha have attacking xG of 1.73 and defensive xG of 1.49 (surplus 0.24), which suggests Omaha will create chances against a weaker defense. Seasonal stats also show 6.0 shots on target for Cosmos versus 3.75 for Omaha and conversion rates of 12% versus 13%, meaning both sides have a realistic chance to score. Considering the league average BTTS of 56% and the above figures, I assess the probability of BTTS at approximately 80% (yes) and 20% (no); therefore my pick is "yes" (BTTS - Yes).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I estimate NY Cosmos to score about 1.87 goals (home xG 2.03 vs. opponents’ average xG against them 1.70) and Union Omaha about 1.18 goals (away xG 1.38 vs. xG against hosts 0.97), yielding a total expected 3.05 goals. This produces a strong signal for Over 1.5: hosts have 83% of matches with at least 2 goals, away side 75%, and a Poisson model with lambda 3.05 prices Over 1.5 at approximately 81%. Over 2.5 is moderately likely — season percentages are 50% for Cosmos and 75% for Union Omaha, the league has 56% of matches over 2.5, and Poisson gives about a 59% chance of Over 2.5. Over 3.5 is less certain: seasonally 33% (hosts) and 25% (guests), and Poisson forecasts roughly 36% for Over 3.5, so Under 3.5 has the edge (~64%). Given the expected 3.05 goals, the high home xG and the frequency of >1.5 matches (83%/75%), I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest play.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is a Half-Time draw with a Home win (X/1), because draws at the break occur frequently — hosts were level at half-time in 67% of matches, while visitors were level in 75%. NY Cosmos dominate after the break: they average 1.67 goals in second halves and win that half in 83% of games, whereas Union Omaha averages only 0.5 goals and wins the second half in 25% of matches. Additionally, the home side’s xG is 2.03 versus the visitors’ 1.38, and the shot averages 17.33 vs 11.75 confirm Cosmos’ offensive superiority, which favors a comeback or takeover of the initiative after half-time. The hosts lead at the break in only 17% of matches, and the average goals at half-time are 0.33 for the home team versus 1.0 for the away team, hence the low share of 1/1, 1/X or 1/2 scenarios. Therefore I assigned X/1 the highest probability at 43%, leaving X/X at 18% and X/2 at 10%, with smaller shares for scenarios featuring a lead at the break (e.g. 1/1 = 8%, 2/1 = 9%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

36Possession (%)64
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
21Shots13
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
3Shots on target7
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
1.92xG1.93
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
5Corners7
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
55Dangerous attacks86
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
17Fouls13
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
0Cards1
NY CosmosUnion Omaha

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

NY CosmosUnion Omaha
1.5Goals scored / match1.8
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
2.5Goals conceded / match1
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
45%Average possession58%
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
4.5Shots on target / match5.1
NY CosmosUnion Omaha

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.63Shots per match15.1
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
4.5Shots on target5.1
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
12.9%Shot conversion11.9%
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
45%Possession58%
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
1.47xG for1.77
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
1.64xG against1.26
NY CosmosUnion Omaha

Shooting quality

NY Cosmos: Counter-attackingUnion Omaha: Dominant
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
Accuracy (shots on target)39%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Union Omaha is 43% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - NY Cosmos · 2 pts / match - Union Omaha

NY Cosmos
WWDLL
Season result split
25% W13% R63% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-5
0.88 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-1
Last 5 at home
2-1-1
LWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.84BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Union Omaha
LWDWW
Season result split
70% W10% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-1-2
2.20 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-2
Last 5 away
2-0-2
LWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.92Opponent xG: 1.22BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Union Omaha is 20% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - NY Cosmos · 1.8 goals / match - Union Omaha

Union Omaha is 150% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.5 goals / match - NY Cosmos · 1 goals / match - Union Omaha

NY Cosmos scoring profile: very strong

NY Cosmos scores in 88% of matches (7 of 8 matches), while Union Omaha keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 matches).

Union Omaha scoring profile: very strong

Union Omaha scores in 90% of matches (9 of 10 matches), while NY Cosmos keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 matches).

12Goals scored (season)18
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
20Goals conceded (season)10
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
4Average goals in match2.8
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
8Goals scored (last 5)9
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
11Goals conceded (last 5)5
NY CosmosUnion Omaha

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal90%
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
50%2 goals70%
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
13%3 goals20%
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
0%4 goals0%
NY CosmosUnion Omaha

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal70%
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
88%2 goals30%
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
63%3 goals0%
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
13%4 goals0%
NY CosmosUnion Omaha

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

57%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time30%
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
13%BTTS in both halves10%
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
38%Scored in both halves40%
NY CosmosUnion Omaha

BTTS and goal count

75%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
60%BTTS - last 560%
NY CosmosUnion Omaha

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

88%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
75%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
NY CosmosUnion Omaha

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
NY CosmosUnion Omaha

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Union Omaha is 73% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.75 pts / match - NY Cosmos · 1.3 pts / match - Union Omaha

NY Cosmos - half-time state
13% leading38% draw50% trailing
Union Omaha - half-time state
20% leading70% draw10% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.75Points per match (1st half)1.3
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.6
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
1.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
2Average goals (1st half)1.1
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
25%Clean sheet before half-time60%
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
63%No goal before half-time50%
NY CosmosUnion Omaha

After half-time (2nd half)

1.63Points per match (2nd half)2
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
1Goals scored (2nd half)1.2
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
2Average goals (2nd half)1.7
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
50%Clean sheet after half-time50%
NY CosmosUnion Omaha
13%No goal after half-time20%
NY CosmosUnion Omaha

NY Cosmos - second-half results

50% W13% R38% P
6
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding192%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Union Omaha - second-half results

60% W20% R20% P
13
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.30
PPG before half-time
Lead holding350%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 70%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

NY Cosmos - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.00
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match1.60.6
Average goals in match2.21.6
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-5+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Union Omaha - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.40
Goals scored / match0.41.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.2
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-2+6
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

NY Cosmos
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
3
3
16-30
0
5
31-45
4
4
46-60
1
2
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Union Omaha
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
5
1
16-30
0
1
31-45
3
1
46-60
1
1
61-75
8
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.40
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 2.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
123%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
68%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
79%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

NY Cosmos

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.83
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.86
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
229%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.52
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Union Omaha

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.51
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
165%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
60%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
44% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
44%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).

Teams vs league

NY CosmosLigaUnion Omaha
Average goals in match 4.002.77 2.80
Both teams scored 75%57% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 88%57% 60%
Clean sheets 13%24% 30%
Goal before half-time 88%74% 60%
Goal after half-time 100%78% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.77
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.68
Home goals / match
1.09
Away goals / match
+54%
Home attack advantage
+35%
Home defence advantage
+30%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Union OmahaYellow cardSami Guediri
  2. NY CosmosGoalAnderson Holt
  3. Union OmahaGoalKempes Tekiela

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of NY Cosmos vs Union Omaha?

The USL League One match finished NY Cosmos 1:2 Union Omaha. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before NY Cosmos vs Union Omaha?

NY Cosmos score 1.50 goals per game on average and Union Omaha 1.80. The USL League One average is 2.77 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 75% of NY Cosmos's matches and 60% of Union Omaha's.

What form are NY Cosmos and Union Omaha in?

Over the last 5 games NY Cosmos have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Union Omaha 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for NY Cosmos vs Union Omaha?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for NY Cosmos vs Union Omaha: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.