Chile - Primera DivisiónData current as of 13 September 2026

O'Higgins vs Universidad Católica: match statistics

125%(2.93)
X25%(3.40)
250%(2.20)

Universidad Católica presents decidedly higher form and quality of play this season, occupying 2nd place in the table compared to O'Higgins' 12th position. The visitors stand out with possession dominance (61% average away) and offensive efficiency, scoring an average of 2 goals per away match with a 100% scoring rate. O'Higgins has poor form in the last 5 matches (1.2 points per match) and only 67% efficiency in home matches, which is insufficient against such a strong rival. Universidad Católica surpasses the hosts in xG statistics (1.54 vs 1.26), average number of shots (15.33 vs 10.67), and shots on target (5.33 vs 4). Taking into account all indicators, especially the advantage in possession, scoring efficiency, and the visitors' better form, a victory for Universidad Católica is the most likely scenario for this meeting.

O'Higgins vs Universidad Católica: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

O'Higgins played Universidad Católica in Primera División (Chile). The match was played on 7 March 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

O'Higgins: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Universidad Católica: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

O'Higgins scores 1.20 and concedes 1.60 goals per match. Universidad Católica scores 2.20 and concedes 1.40. League average: 2.31 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: O'Higgins 60%, Universidad Católica 80%. Over 2.5: O'Higgins 60%, Universidad Católica 80%. League level: BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

Universidad Católica has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.36. O'Higgins: 12.2 shots per match, Universidad Católica: 15.0.

Match halves

O'Higgins: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.60. Universidad Católica: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.40.

Goals by minute

O'Higgins: 76-90+ (3 goals). Universidad Católica: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Primera División: 2.31 goals per match, BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Universidad Católica presents decidedly higher form and quality of play this season, occupying 2nd place in the table compared to O'Higgins' 12th position. The visitors stand out with possession dominance (61% average away) and offensive efficiency, scoring an average of 2 goals per away match with a 100% scoring rate. O'Higgins has poor form in the last 5 matches (1.2 points per match) and only 67% efficiency in home matches, which is insufficient against such a strong rival. Universidad Católica surpasses the hosts in xG statistics (1.54 vs 1.26), average number of shots (15.33 vs 10.67), and shots on target (5.33 vs 4). Taking into account all indicators, especially the advantage in possession, scoring efficiency, and the visitors' better form, a victory for Universidad Católica is the most likely scenario for this meeting.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
7Shots8
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
3Shots on target3
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
0.76xG0.84
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
5Corners4
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
13Dangerous attacks13
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
15Fouls9
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
3Cards3
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
1.2Goals scored / match2.2
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
1.6Goals conceded / match1.4
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
50%Average possession57%
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
4.2Shots on target / match5.6
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.2Shots per match15
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
4.2Shots on target5.6
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
9.8%Shot conversion14.7%
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
50%Possession57%
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
1.36xG for1.49
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
1.28xG against1.07
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica

Shooting quality

O'Higgins: BalancedUniversidad Católica: Dominant
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
Accuracy (shots on target)34%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.10
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Universidad Católica is 67% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - O'Higgins · 2 pts / match - Universidad Católica

O'Higgins
WWLLL
Season result split
40% W0% D60% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 at home
2-0-1
WWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Universidad Católica
DWLWW
Season result split
60% W20% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 away
1-1-1
DLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.07BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Universidad Católica is 83% better for: goals scored per match.

1.2 goals / match - O'Higgins · 2.2 goals / match - Universidad Católica

Universidad Católica is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.6 goals / match - O'Higgins · 1.4 goals / match - Universidad Católica

O'Higgins scoring profile: very strong

O'Higgins scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Universidad Católica keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

Universidad Católica scoring profile: very strong

Universidad Católica scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while O'Higgins keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

6Goals scored (season)11
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
8Goals conceded (season)7
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
2.8Average goals in match3.6
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
6Goals scored (last 5)11
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
8Goals conceded (last 5)7
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal100%
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
40%2 goals100%
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
0%3 goals20%
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
0%4 goals0%
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal80%
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
40%2 goals40%
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
20%3 goals20%
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
20%4 goals0%
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

80%
Universidad Católica - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.4 of 5 matches
42%
League average

Goal patterns

40%BTTS at half-time80%
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
20%BTTS in both halves20%
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
40%Scored in both halves80%
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS80%
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
60%BTTS - last 580%
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time80%
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time40%
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

O'Higgins is 133% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.4 pts / match - O'Higgins · 0.6 pts / match - Universidad Católica

O'Higgins - half-time state
20% leading80% draw0% trailing
Universidad Católica - half-time state
0% leading60% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.4Points per match (1st half)0.6
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.8
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)1.2
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
1Average goals (1st half)2
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
60%Clean sheet before half-time20%
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
40%No goal before half-time20%
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica

After half-time (2nd half)

0.8Points per match (2nd half)2.6
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)1.4
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
1.2Goals conceded (2nd half)0.2
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
1.8Average goals (2nd half)1.6
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
20%Clean sheet after half-time80%
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica
40%No goal after half-time0%
O'HigginsUniversidad Católica

O'Higgins - second-half results

20% W20% D60% L
7
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Universidad Católica - second-half results

80% W20% D0% L
3
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.60
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-1.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

O'Higgins - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.41.2
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Universidad Católica - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.602.60
Goals scored / match0.81.4
Goals conceded / match1.20.2
Average goals in match2.01.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal20%0%
Goal difference-2+6
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 80% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

O'Higgins
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
2
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
3
46-60
0
1
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Universidad Católica
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
0
2
16-30
4
2
31-45
2
1
46-60
2
0
61-75
3
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.20
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
139%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
70%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-37%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
80%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

O'Higgins

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
172%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

Universidad Católica

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.42
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.71
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
237%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).

Teams vs league

O'HigginsLigaUniversidad Católica
Average goals in match 2.802.31 3.60
Both teams scored 60%42% 80%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%47% 80%
Clean sheets 20%31% 20%
Goal before half-time 60%67% 80%
Goal after half-time 100%78% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.31
Average goals per match
42%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / match
0.93
Away goals / match
+48%
Home attack advantage
+33%
Home defence advantage
+24%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. O'HigginsYellow cardLuis Alberto Pavez Muñoz
  2. Universidad CatólicaYellow cardBranco Ampuero Vera
  3. Universidad CatólicaYellow cardCristian Alejandro Cuevas Jara
  4. Universidad CatólicaYellow cardJuan Ignacio Díaz
  5. O'HigginsSubstitutionOn: Thiago Vecino BerrielOff: Arnaldo Castillo Benega
  6. O'HigginsYellow cardThiago Vecino Berriel
  7. O'HigginsYellow cardFelipe Ogaz
  8. Universidad CatólicaSubstitutionOn: Martín Alejandro GómezOff: Justo Giani

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): O'Higgins 2 - 0 - 0 Universidad Católica. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

CD Universidad Católica
0 : 2
CD O'Higgins
CD O'Higgins
2 : 0
CD Universidad Católica

FAQ

What was the result of O'Higgins vs Universidad Católica?

The Primera División match finished O'Higgins 1:0 Universidad Católica. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between O'Higgins and Universidad Católica?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches O'Higgins won 2, Universidad Católica won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before O'Higgins vs Universidad Católica?

O'Higgins score 1.20 goals per game on average and Universidad Católica 2.20. The Primera División average is 2.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 60% of O'Higgins's matches and 80% of Universidad Católica's.

What form are O'Higgins and Universidad Católica in?

Over the last 5 games O'Higgins have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Universidad Católica 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for O'Higgins vs Universidad Católica?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for O'Higgins vs Universidad Católica: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.