Denmark - SuperligaNature Energy ParkData current as of 02 November 2026

OB vs Silkeborg: match statistics

OB crest
OB
4 : 1half-time 1:1
Silkeborg crest
Silkeborg

OB vs Silkeborg: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

OB played Silkeborg in Superliga (Denmark). The match was played on 1 November 2026. Venue: Nature Energy Park. Final score: 4:1.

Current form

OB: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Silkeborg: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

OB scores 0.92 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. Silkeborg scores 1.33 and concedes 1.67. League average: 3.07 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: OB 58%, Silkeborg 67%. Over 2.5: OB 42%, Silkeborg 50%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 58%.

xG, shots and style

OB has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.28. OB: 14.0 shots per match, Silkeborg: 11.1.

Match halves

OB: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.33. Silkeborg: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.58.

Goals by minute

OB: 16-30 (4 goals). Silkeborg: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Superliga: 3.07 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 58%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-4. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 80%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

OB head into the match unbeaten in their last 5 games, having recorded 2 wins and 3 draws, while Silkeborg have won only once during that period. At home, the hosts create chances worth an average xG of 1.74, well above the visitors’ away xG of 1.15, and also average 15.8 shots compared with Silkeborg’s 9.83. OB’s main concern is their finishing: despite that xG, they score just 1 goal per home game, while the visitors average 1.33 goals away from home. Both defences remain vulnerable, with OB conceding an average of 1.8 goals at home and Silkeborg 1.83 away. However, the hosts have conceded just 4 goals in their last 5 games, compared with 9 for the visitors. OB’s stronger recent form and the quality of their chance creation give them the edge, although their poor finishing means a draw remains a realistic outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS landed in 83% of OB’s matches and 50% of Silkeborg’s, rising to 80% and 60%, respectively, across the teams’ last five appearances. OB averaged 1.33 goals per match and failed to score in none of its games, strengthening the case for the hosts to find the net against opponents conceding an average of 1.83 goals. Silkeborg also averaged 1.33 goals, while OB conceded 1.50; moreover, the visitors averaged 1.8 goals in their last five matches. One risk for BTTS - Yes is that Silkeborg failed to score in 33% of its matches, although OB kept a clean sheet in only 17% of games. Overall, these figures point to both teams scoring, though the case for this outcome is not decisive.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

At least two goals were scored in 83% of matches involving the two teams, making Over 1.5 a stronger signal than the other lines. OB average 1.33 goals scored and 1.50 conceded, while Silkeborg average 1.33 scored and 1.83 conceded, pointing to goal-scoring potential at both ends. The hosts create chances worth an average of 1.42 xG, while the visitors allow 1.68 xG, so their chances of scoring look solid. In their last five matches, Silkeborg scored and conceded an average of 1.8 goals per game, although OB conceded just 0.8 per match over the same period. The 2.80-goal forecast supports Over 1.5, while the gap between the teams on Over 2.5 — 33% for OB compared with 67% for Silkeborg — limits confidence in the higher line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario appears to be OB leading at the break, with the match ending in a draw. The hosts were ahead at half-time in 3 of their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 0.8 goals before the break during that period, while Silkeborg conceded 1.0. However, OB are not certain to hold on to their lead: they have drawn 4 of their 6 matches this season, and both teams recorded 3 draws in their last 5 games. Silkeborg averaged 1.2 goals after the break in their last 5 matches, increasing the chances of an equaliser even if OB score first. Therefore, I rate an OB lead at half-time followed by a draw at full-time higher than the hosts holding on to win.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
3 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
OBSilkeborg
21Shots9
OBSilkeborg
9Shots on target3
OBSilkeborg
2.22xG1.05
OBSilkeborg
10Corners6
OBSilkeborg
37Dangerous attacks35
OBSilkeborg
12Fouls7
OBSilkeborg
0Cards3
OBSilkeborg

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.92Goals scored / match1.33
OBSilkeborg
1.33Goals conceded / match1.67
OBSilkeborg
50%Average possession48%
OBSilkeborg
3.83Shots on target / match4.5
OBSilkeborg

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14Shots per match11.08
OBSilkeborg
3.83Shots on target4.5
OBSilkeborg
6.5%Shot conversion12%
OBSilkeborg
50%Possession48%
OBSilkeborg
1.53xG for1.28
OBSilkeborg
1.65xG against1.58
OBSilkeborg

Shooting quality

OB: AttackingSilkeborg: Balanced
OBSilkeborg
Accuracy (shots on target)27%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

OB is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - OB · 1.2 pts / match - Silkeborg

OB
WDDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
25% W42% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-5-4
1.17 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Silkeborg
DWDLD
Season result split
17% W50% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-6-4
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-3
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.49BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Silkeborg is 45% better for: goals scored per match.

0.92 goals / match - OB · 1.33 goals / match - Silkeborg

OB is 26% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.33 goals / match - OB · 1.67 goals / match - Silkeborg

OB scoring profile: very strong

OB scores in 67% of matches (8 of 12 matches), while Silkeborg keeps a clean sheet in 17% (2 of 12 matches).

Silkeborg scoring profile: very strong

Silkeborg scores in 83% of matches (10 of 12 matches), while OB keeps a clean sheet in 17% (2 of 12 matches).

11Goals scored (season)16
OBSilkeborg
16Goals conceded (season)20
OBSilkeborg
2.25Average goals in match3
OBSilkeborg
6Goals scored (last 5)9
OBSilkeborg
4Goals conceded (last 5)9
OBSilkeborg

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal83%
OBSilkeborg
25%2 goals25%
OBSilkeborg
0%3 goals17%
OBSilkeborg
0%4 goals8%
OBSilkeborg

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal83%
OBSilkeborg
25%2 goals42%
OBSilkeborg
8%3 goals33%
OBSilkeborg
8%4 goals8%
OBSilkeborg

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time17%
OBSilkeborg
0%BTTS in both halves0%
OBSilkeborg
8%Scored in both halves8%
OBSilkeborg

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
OBSilkeborg
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
OBSilkeborg
80%BTTS - last 560%
OBSilkeborg

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

58%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
OBSilkeborg
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time42%
OBSilkeborg
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
OBSilkeborg

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time92%
OBSilkeborg
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
OBSilkeborg
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
OBSilkeborg

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Silkeborg is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - OB · 1.75 pts / match - Silkeborg

OB - half-time state
33% leading50% draw17% trailing
Silkeborg - half-time state
50% leading25% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)1.75
OBSilkeborg
0.58Goals scored (1st half)0.75
OBSilkeborg
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
OBSilkeborg
1.08Average goals (1st half)1.42
OBSilkeborg
58%Clean sheet before half-time67%
OBSilkeborg
58%No goal before half-time33%
OBSilkeborg

After half-time (2nd half)

0.83Points per match (2nd half)0.83
OBSilkeborg
0.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.58
OBSilkeborg
0.83Goals conceded (2nd half)1
OBSilkeborg
1.17Average goals (2nd half)1.58
OBSilkeborg
33%Clean sheet after half-time25%
OBSilkeborg
67%No goal after half-time75%
OBSilkeborg

OB - second-half results

17% W33% D50% L
18
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding76%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 25%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Silkeborg - second-half results

25% W8% D67% L
21
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding34%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 17%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

OB - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.20
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.20.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Silkeborg - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.20
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.62.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

OB
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
4
2
16-30
2
2
31-45
0
4
46-60
1
2
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Silkeborg
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
2
2
16-30
5
3
31-45
3
4
46-60
3
2
61-75
1
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.63
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
86%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+14%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

OB

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.61
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
55%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.63
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Silkeborg

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
6% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
6%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Superliga).

Teams vs league

OBLigaSilkeborg
Average goals in match▼ 2.253.07• 3.00
Both teams scored▼ 58%63%▲ 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 42%58%▼ 50%
Clean sheets▼ 17%21%▼ 17%
Goal before half-time▼ 58%77%▲ 83%
Goal after half-time▼ 83%88%▲ 92%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.07
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.66
Home goals / match
1.41
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SilkeborgYellow cardOliver Ross
  2. SilkeborgYellow cardAlexander Priesborg Madsen
  3. SilkeborgSubstitutionOn: Rami HajalOff: Lucas Thorst Riisgaard
  4. SilkeborgSubstitutionOn: Sofus Berger BrixOff: Kristian Kirkegaard
  5. SilkeborgSubstitutionOn: Mads Lautrup FreundlichOff: Oliver Ross
  6. SilkeborgYellow cardPedro Luís Machado Ganchas
  7. SilkeborgSubstitutionOn: Mikkel ØxenbergOff: Mads Larsen

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): OB 0 - 1 - 4 Silkeborg. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 80% matches.

Silkeborg
1 : 0
OB
Odense BK
2 : 3
Silkeborg IF
Silkeborg IF
3 : 1
Odense BK
Odense BK
1 : 1
Silkeborg IF
Silkeborg IF
2 : 1
Odense BK

FAQ

What was the result of OB vs Silkeborg?

The Superliga match finished OB 4:1 Silkeborg. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between OB and Silkeborg?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches OB won 0, Silkeborg won 4 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before OB vs Silkeborg?

OB score 0.92 goals per game on average and Silkeborg 1.33. The Superliga average is 3.07 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 58% of OB's matches and 67% of Silkeborg's.

What form are OB and Silkeborg in?

Over the last 5 games OB have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Silkeborg 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for OB vs Silkeborg?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for OB vs Silkeborg: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.