Oldham Athletic vs Chesterfield: match statistics
Oldham Athletic vs Chesterfield: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Oldham Athletic played Chesterfield in EFL League Two (England). The match was played on 12 September 2026. Venue: Boundary Park. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Oldham Athletic: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Chesterfield: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Oldham Athletic scores 1.40 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Chesterfield scores 1.20 and concedes 1.40. League average: 2.68 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Oldham Athletic 40%, Chesterfield 60%. Over 2.5: Oldham Athletic 40%, Chesterfield 40%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
Chesterfield has higher xG: 1.72 vs 1.62. Oldham Athletic: 15.2 shots per match, Chesterfield: 15.2.
Match halves
Oldham Athletic: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 0.80. Chesterfield: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.60.
Goals by minute
Oldham Athletic: 31-45+ (2 goals). Chesterfield: 76-90+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
League Two: 2.68 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Oldham Athletic have a clearly superior home record: they have won both matches played, averaging 2.5 goals scored and conceding none. The hosts also create more in the final third, averaging 18.5 shots and 6 on target, compared with Chesterfield’s away figures of 10.5 and 2.5, respectively. Oldham’s advantage is also evident in chance quality: their average xG stands at 1.96 versus 1.19 for the visitors, while their opponents generate just 0.90 xG at Oldham’s home ground. Chesterfield average 1 goal scored away from home and have lost 50% of their matches, while in their last five games they have managed only 1 point per match compared with Oldham’s 1.4. The visitors should be capable of creating a few chances, but the hosts’ defensive solidity and significantly greater attacking output point towards an Oldham win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Oldham’s BTTS rate stands at 67%, while Chesterfield’s is 50%, providing a slight indication towards both teams scoring, close to the league average of 56%. The hosts have failed to keep a clean sheet in any match, conceding an average of 1.67 goals, while Chesterfield have scored in every game and average 1.0 goal per match. Oldham create plenty of chances: their average xG is 2.08, with 18.33 shots and 6.67 shots on target per game, making a home goal highly likely despite a conversion rate of just 7%. Over their last five matches, Chesterfield have recorded an xG of 1.72, while Oldham’s defence allows opponents 1.29 xG, supporting the visitors’ chances of scoring. The BTTS pick is nevertheless moderately strong, as Chesterfield have kept a clean sheet in 50% of their matches; however, Oldham’s attacking advantage and the hosts’ defensive weakness ultimately favour a scenario in which both teams score. BTTS - No means that at least one team fails to score; it does not automatically mean a 0-0 draw or that neither team will score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Oldham create a high volume of chances at home, with an average xG of 2.08 and 18.33 shots per match, but convert this into just 1.33 goals scored. Chesterfield concede an average of 1.00 goal away from home and keep a clean sheet in 50% of their matches, which limits the prospects of a very high-scoring game for the hosts. In their last five matches, both teams recorded Over 2.5 goals in only 40% of cases, while their respective average total goal tallies were 1.4 and 1.2 goals. The Under 3.5 line receives further support from the season data: such results occurred in 67% of Oldham matches and in all of Chesterfield’s away fixtures. The 2.55-goal projection allows for a three-goal outcome, but indicates that a fourth goal remains considerably less likely.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal points to Oldham leading at the break and maintaining their advantage until the final whistle, as the hosts were ahead at half-time in 60% of their last five matches, while Chesterfield were trailing at that stage in 60%. During this run, Oldham conceded just 0.2 goals per match before half-time, compared with 0.8 for the visitors, clearly favouring the 1/1 scenario. The hosts are also creating significantly more chances: their average xG stands at 2.08 versus Chesterfield’s 1.19, while their average number of shots on target is 6.67 compared with 2.50. Recent full-time form also slightly favours Oldham, who averaged 1.4 points per match and won 40% of their games, whereas Chesterfield recorded 1.0 points and a 20% win rate. The risk stems from the visitors’ stronger full-season record, which is why the 2/2 scenario remains the second-strongest option; however, the current first-half data provide clearer support for the hosts.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Oldham Athletic | Chesterfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Oldham Athletic is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Oldham Athletic · 1 pts / match - Chesterfield
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Oldham Athletic is 17% better for: goals scored per match.
1.4 goals / match - Oldham Athletic · 1.2 goals / match - Chesterfield
Oldham Athletic is 40% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - Oldham Athletic · 1.4 goals / match - Chesterfield
Oldham Athletic scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Chesterfield keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).
Chesterfield scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Oldham Athletic keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Oldham Athletic
Over / Under - Chesterfield
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Oldham Athletic is 67% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / match - Oldham Athletic · 1.2 pts / match - Chesterfield
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Oldham Athletic - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 40%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Chesterfield - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Oldham Athletic
Chesterfield
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).
Teams vs league
| Oldham Athletic | Liga | Chesterfield | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.40 | 2.68 | • 2.60 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 56% | ▲ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 50% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 40% | 26% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 76% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 76% | ▼ 60% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Oldham Athletic 1 - 1 - 0 Chesterfield. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Oldham Athletic vs Chesterfield?
The EFL League Two match finished Oldham Athletic 1:2 Chesterfield. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Oldham Athletic and Chesterfield?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Oldham Athletic won 1, Chesterfield won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Oldham Athletic vs Chesterfield?
Oldham Athletic score 1.40 goals per game on average and Chesterfield 1.20. The EFL League Two average is 2.68 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Oldham Athletic's matches and 60% of Chesterfield's.
What form are Oldham Athletic and Chesterfield in?
Over the last 5 games Oldham Athletic have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Chesterfield 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Oldham Athletic vs Chesterfield?
The statistical background for Oldham Athletic vs Chesterfield — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


