England - EFL League TwoBoundary ParkData current as of 13 September 2026

Oldham Athletic vs Chesterfield: match statistics

Oldham Athletic crest
Oldham Athletic
1 : 2half-time 0:1
Chesterfield crest
Chesterfield

Oldham Athletic vs Chesterfield: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Oldham Athletic played Chesterfield in EFL League Two (England). The match was played on 12 September 2026. Venue: Boundary Park. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Oldham Athletic: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Chesterfield: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Oldham Athletic scores 1.40 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Chesterfield scores 1.20 and concedes 1.40. League average: 2.68 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Oldham Athletic 40%, Chesterfield 60%. Over 2.5: Oldham Athletic 40%, Chesterfield 40%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Chesterfield has higher xG: 1.72 vs 1.62. Oldham Athletic: 15.2 shots per match, Chesterfield: 15.2.

Match halves

Oldham Athletic: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 0.80. Chesterfield: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.60.

Goals by minute

Oldham Athletic: 31-45+ (2 goals). Chesterfield: 76-90+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

League Two: 2.68 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Oldham Athletic have a clearly superior home record: they have won both matches played, averaging 2.5 goals scored and conceding none. The hosts also create more in the final third, averaging 18.5 shots and 6 on target, compared with Chesterfield’s away figures of 10.5 and 2.5, respectively. Oldham’s advantage is also evident in chance quality: their average xG stands at 1.96 versus 1.19 for the visitors, while their opponents generate just 0.90 xG at Oldham’s home ground. Chesterfield average 1 goal scored away from home and have lost 50% of their matches, while in their last five games they have managed only 1 point per match compared with Oldham’s 1.4. The visitors should be capable of creating a few chances, but the hosts’ defensive solidity and significantly greater attacking output point towards an Oldham win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Oldham’s BTTS rate stands at 67%, while Chesterfield’s is 50%, providing a slight indication towards both teams scoring, close to the league average of 56%. The hosts have failed to keep a clean sheet in any match, conceding an average of 1.67 goals, while Chesterfield have scored in every game and average 1.0 goal per match. Oldham create plenty of chances: their average xG is 2.08, with 18.33 shots and 6.67 shots on target per game, making a home goal highly likely despite a conversion rate of just 7%. Over their last five matches, Chesterfield have recorded an xG of 1.72, while Oldham’s defence allows opponents 1.29 xG, supporting the visitors’ chances of scoring. The BTTS pick is nevertheless moderately strong, as Chesterfield have kept a clean sheet in 50% of their matches; however, Oldham’s attacking advantage and the hosts’ defensive weakness ultimately favour a scenario in which both teams score. BTTS - No means that at least one team fails to score; it does not automatically mean a 0-0 draw or that neither team will score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Oldham create a high volume of chances at home, with an average xG of 2.08 and 18.33 shots per match, but convert this into just 1.33 goals scored. Chesterfield concede an average of 1.00 goal away from home and keep a clean sheet in 50% of their matches, which limits the prospects of a very high-scoring game for the hosts. In their last five matches, both teams recorded Over 2.5 goals in only 40% of cases, while their respective average total goal tallies were 1.4 and 1.2 goals. The Under 3.5 line receives further support from the season data: such results occurred in 67% of Oldham matches and in all of Chesterfield’s away fixtures. The 2.55-goal projection allows for a three-goal outcome, but indicates that a fourth goal remains considerably less likely.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal points to Oldham leading at the break and maintaining their advantage until the final whistle, as the hosts were ahead at half-time in 60% of their last five matches, while Chesterfield were trailing at that stage in 60%. During this run, Oldham conceded just 0.2 goals per match before half-time, compared with 0.8 for the visitors, clearly favouring the 1/1 scenario. The hosts are also creating significantly more chances: their average xG stands at 2.08 versus Chesterfield’s 1.19, while their average number of shots on target is 6.67 compared with 2.50. Recent full-time form also slightly favours Oldham, who averaged 1.4 points per match and won 40% of their games, whereas Chesterfield recorded 1.0 points and a 20% win rate. The risk stems from the visitors’ stronger full-season record, which is why the 2/2 scenario remains the second-strongest option; however, the current first-half data provide clearer support for the hosts.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
8Shots13
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
6Shots on target5
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
1.17xG1.51
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
1Corners4
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
31Dangerous attacks47
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
16Fouls10
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
2Cards3
Oldham AthleticChesterfield

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Oldham AthleticChesterfield
1.4Goals scored / match1.2
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
1Goals conceded / match1.4
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
43%Average possession58%
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
4.6Shots on target / match5
Oldham AthleticChesterfield

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.2Shots per match15.2
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
4.6Shots on target5
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
9.2%Shot conversion7.9%
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
43%Possession58%
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
1.62xG for1.72
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
1.29xG against1.46
Oldham AthleticChesterfield

Shooting quality

Oldham Athletic: AttackingChesterfield: Dominant
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
Accuracy (shots on target)30%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Oldham Athletic is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Oldham Athletic · 1 pts / match - Chesterfield

Oldham Athletic
WLWDL
Season result split
40% W20% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 at home
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.62Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Chesterfield
LWLDD
Season result split
20% W40% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 away
1-0-1
WL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.72Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Oldham Athletic is 17% better for: goals scored per match.

1.4 goals / match - Oldham Athletic · 1.2 goals / match - Chesterfield

Oldham Athletic is 40% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Oldham Athletic · 1.4 goals / match - Chesterfield

Oldham Athletic scoring profile: very strong

Oldham Athletic scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Chesterfield keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

Chesterfield scoring profile: strong

Chesterfield scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Oldham Athletic keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 matches).

7Goals scored (season)6
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
5Goals conceded (season)7
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
2.4Average goals in match2.6
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
7Goals scored (last 5)6
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
5Goals conceded (last 5)7
Oldham AthleticChesterfield

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal80%
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
40%2 goals20%
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
20%3 goals20%
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
0%4 goals0%
Oldham AthleticChesterfield

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal80%
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
40%2 goals40%
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
0%3 goals20%
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
0%4 goals0%
Oldham AthleticChesterfield

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time20%
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
0%BTTS in both halves20%
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
20%Scored in both halves20%
Oldham AthleticChesterfield

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
40%BTTS - last 560%
Oldham AthleticChesterfield

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
Oldham AthleticChesterfield

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time60%
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Oldham AthleticChesterfield

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Oldham Athletic is 67% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - Oldham Athletic · 1.2 pts / match - Chesterfield

Oldham Athletic - half-time state
60% leading20% draw20% trailing
Chesterfield - half-time state
40% leading0% draw60% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)1.2
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.6
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
0.2Goals conceded (1st half)0.8
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
0.8Average goals (1st half)1.4
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
80%Clean sheet before half-time40%
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
40%No goal before half-time40%
Oldham AthleticChesterfield

After half-time (2nd half)

1.2Points per match (2nd half)1.2
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
0.8Goals scored (2nd half)0.6
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)0.6
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
1.6Average goals (2nd half)1.2
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
40%Clean sheet after half-time40%
Oldham AthleticChesterfield
60%No goal after half-time60%
Oldham AthleticChesterfield

Oldham Athletic - second-half results

40% W0% D60% L
10
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 40%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chesterfield - second-half results

20% W60% D20% L
6
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Oldham Athletic - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.20
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Chesterfield - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal100%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Oldham Athletic
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
2
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Chesterfield
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
2
31-45
0
1
46-60
1
0
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
0%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Oldham Athletic

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Chesterfield

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.46
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.52
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
111%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).

Teams vs league

Oldham AthleticLigaChesterfield
Average goals in match 2.402.68 2.60
Both teams scored 40%56% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 40%50% 40%
Clean sheets 40%26% 20%
Goal before half-time 80%76% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%76% 60%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.68
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.60
Home goals / match
1.08
Away goals / match
+48%
Home attack advantage
+33%
Home defence advantage
+35%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ChesterfieldGoalLee Bonis
  2. Oldham AthleticYellow cardOliver Norburn
  3. ChesterfieldYellow cardRemeao Hutton
  4. ChesterfieldYellow cardKyle John McFadzean
  5. Oldham AthleticGoalFavour FawunmiAssist: Jamie Robson
  6. ChesterfieldGoalDilan Kumar MarkandayAssist: Josh Koroma
  7. Oldham AthleticYellow cardRyan Liam Delaney
  8. ChesterfieldSubstitutionOn: Tom NaylorOff: Ryan Stirk
  9. Oldham AthleticSubstitutionOn: Thomas George PettOff: Oliver Norburn
  10. ChesterfieldSubstitutionOn: Liam MandevilleOff: Louie Marsh
  11. ChesterfieldSubstitutionOn: Joel RandallOff: Josh Koroma
  12. ChesterfieldYellow cardJunior Eccleston

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Oldham Athletic 1 - 1 - 0 Chesterfield. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Oldham Athletic vs Chesterfield?

The EFL League Two match finished Oldham Athletic 1:2 Chesterfield. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Oldham Athletic and Chesterfield?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Oldham Athletic won 1, Chesterfield won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Oldham Athletic vs Chesterfield?

Oldham Athletic score 1.40 goals per game on average and Chesterfield 1.20. The EFL League Two average is 2.68 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Oldham Athletic's matches and 60% of Chesterfield's.

What form are Oldham Athletic and Chesterfield in?

Over the last 5 games Oldham Athletic have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Chesterfield 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Oldham Athletic vs Chesterfield?

The statistical background for Oldham Athletic vs Chesterfield — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.