Olimpia Elbląg vs Mławianka Mława: match statistics
Olimpia Elbląg vs Mławianka Mława: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Olimpia Elbląg played Mławianka Mława in 3 Liga Group 1 (Poland). The match was played on 25 April 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Olimpia Elbląg: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Mławianka Mława: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Olimpia Elbląg scores 1.41 and concedes 1.81 goals per match. Mławianka Mława scores 1.63 and concedes 1.89. League average: 3.38 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Olimpia Elbląg 67%, Mławianka Mława 78%. Over 2.5: Olimpia Elbląg 59%, Mławianka Mława 78%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 68%.
xG, shots and style
Mławianka Mława has higher xG: 1.76 vs 1.29. Olimpia Elbląg: 7.6 shots per match, Mławianka Mława: 9.4.
Match halves
Olimpia Elbląg: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67. Mławianka Mława: half-time lead 4%, second-half goals 1.26.
Goals by minute
Olimpia Elbląg: 31-45+ (8 goals). Mławianka Mława: 76-90+ (15 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
3 Liga Group 1: 3.38 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 68%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back an away win: Mławianka Mława in the last 5 matches has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, scoring 11 goals (2.2 per game) and averaging 2.0 points per match, while Olimpia Elbląg over the same period has only 1 win, 4 losses, 4 goals and 0.6 points per match. Season-long numbers are more balanced — Olimpia sits 11th and at home averages 1.5 goals scored and 1.64 conceded (home goal difference -2), whereas Mławianka is 16th and away averages 1.31 goals and 1.92 conceded (away goal difference -8). Quality of chances is similar — xG for the hosts is 1.35 versus 1.27 xG for the visitors on the road, and average shots on target are 4.08 for Olimpia versus 3.67 for Mławianka, so the hosts create marginally more opportunities. The decisive factor is the trend: Olimpia conceded 11 goals in the last 5 matches versus 5 conceded by Mławianka, and with higher possession for the visitors (53% vs 49%) and better points form (2.0 vs 0.6) Mławianka has a clear control-offensive edge. Based on this I assess Mławianka’s chances as 50% to win, 25% draw and 25% for Olimpia.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams strongly lean toward BTTS: Olimpia has BTTS in 86% of matches, Mławianka in 69%, and the league average is 64%, indicating a strong trend for both sides to score and concede. Clean sheets are rare — Olimpia 7% and Mławianka 15% — while average goals conceded are 1.86 (Olimpia) and 1.92 (Mławianka), meaning both teams allow nearly 1.9 goals per game. Olimpia creates a lot of chances (xG 2.25 and 8.56 shots on target on average), and Mławianka has been in scoring form recently (averaging 2.2 goals in the last 5 games and last xG 1.8), so both sides have realistic scoring opportunities. Additionally, matches involving these teams frequently exceed 2.5 goals — 86% for Olimpia and 69% for Mławianka — and the combination of over 2.5 goals and BTTS occurred in 79% and 54% of games respectively. Based on this I assign 82% to 'yes' and 18% to 'no', making the 'yes' tip the strongest signal from the data.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I calculated expected goals as the average of the home attack xG and the opponent’s defensive xG: Olimpia 1.78 (attack xG 2.25 vs Mławianka defense xG 1.30), Mławianka 1.36 (attack xG 1.27 vs Olimpia defense xG 1.44), total 3.14. Assuming a Poisson distribution with lambda=3.14 we get ~82% probability of at least 2 goals in the match and ~61% probability of at least 3 goals. Seasonal indicators confirm offensive tendencies: Olimpia has 93% of matches with over 1.5 goals, Mławianka 85%, and BTTS rates are 86% (Olimpia) and 69% (Mławianka), with Olimpia averaging 8.56 shots on target versus 3.67 for the opponent. For these reasons the strongest signal is Over 1.5 — I combine Poisson (≈82%) with seasonal 93%/85% and assign Over 1.5 a probability of 88% (Under 12%). I assess Over 2.5 at 70% (Poisson ≈61% and seasonal 86%/69% support it), and Over 3.5 at 38% (total xG 3.14 below 3.5 and seasonal over35 50%/38% favor Under 62%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at Half-Time: the home team were level at the break in 64% of matches, the visitors in 54%, and in the visitors’ last five fixtures the HT draw rate was 75%. After the break Olimpia should take control — their xG is 2.25 versus the opponents’ 1.27, they average 8.56 shots on target to 3.67, and score 1.57 goals in the second half on average versus the visitors’ 0.92. The home side also have 100% of matches with at least one goal in the second half and win the second half in 56% of cases, which supports a turnaround from a draw to a final victory. For these reasons the strongest signal is HT/FT draw then home win (X/1), which I assign the highest probability to; the draw–draw (X/X) variant is the second most likely outcome. I assign lower chances to scenarios where the visitors lead at the break (they have a 0% rate of leading at HT this season), hence the low probabilities for combinations starting with 2.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Olimpia Elbląg | Mławianka Mława | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.19 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.53 | 0.44 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Mławianka Mława is 233% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Olimpia Elbląg · 2 pts / match - Mławianka Mława
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Mławianka Mława is 16% better for: goals scored per match.
1.41 goals / match - Olimpia Elbląg · 1.63 goals / match - Mławianka Mława
Olimpia Elbląg scores in 85% of matches (23 of 27 matches), while Mławianka Mława keeps a clean sheet in 11% (3 of 27 matches).
Mławianka Mława scores in 85% of matches (23 of 27 matches), while Olimpia Elbląg keeps a clean sheet in 19% (5 of 27 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Olimpia Elbląg
Over / Under - Mławianka Mława
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Olimpia Elbląg is 90% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / match - Olimpia Elbląg · 0.7 pts / match - Mławianka Mława
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Olimpia Elbląg - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Mławianka Mława - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 4% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +8 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Olimpia Elbląg
Mławianka Mława
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 1).
Teams vs league
| Olimpia Elbląg | Liga | Mławianka Mława | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 3.22 | 3.38 | ▲ 3.52 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 64% | ▲ 78% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 59% | 68% | ▲ 78% |
| Clean sheets | • 19% | 20% | ▼ 11% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 78% | 75% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | • 85% | 86% | ▲ 93% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Mławianka MławaGoalGabriel Kirejczyk
- Mławianka MławaGoalMateusz Cegiełka
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Olimpia Elbląg 0 - 1 - 0 Mławianka Mława. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Olimpia Elbląg vs Mławianka Mława?
The 3 Liga Group 1 match finished Olimpia Elbląg 0:2 Mławianka Mława. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Olimpia Elbląg vs Mławianka Mława?
Olimpia Elbląg score 1.41 goals per game on average and Mławianka Mława 1.63. The 3 Liga Group 1 average is 3.38 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Olimpia Elbląg's matches and 78% of Mławianka Mława's.
What form are Olimpia Elbląg and Mławianka Mława in?
Over the last 5 games Olimpia Elbląg have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Mławianka Mława 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Olimpia Elbląg vs Mławianka Mława?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


