Olympic Charleroi vs Lommel United: match statistics
Olympic Charleroi vs Lommel United: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Olympic Charleroi played Lommel United in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 16 December 2025. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Olympic Charleroi: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Lommel United: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Olympic Charleroi scores 0.81 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. Lommel United scores 2.00 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.73 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Olympic Charleroi 44%, Lommel United 63%. Over 2.5: Olympic Charleroi 50%, Lommel United 69%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
Lommel United has higher xG: 1.79 vs 1.34. Olympic Charleroi: 10.9 shots per match, Lommel United: 15.9.
Match halves
Olympic Charleroi: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.50. Lommel United: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 1.25.
Goals by minute
Olympic Charleroi: 76-90+ (5 goals). Lommel United: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division B: 2.73 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Olympic Charleroi | Lommel United | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.21 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Lommel United is 147% better for: goals scored per match.
0.81 goals / match - Olympic Charleroi · 2 goals / match - Lommel United
Lommel United is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.
2 goals / match - Olympic Charleroi · 1.5 goals / match - Lommel United
Olympic Charleroi scores in 50% of matches (8 of 16 matches), while Lommel United keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 matches).
Lommel United scores in 88% of matches (14 of 16 matches), while Olympic Charleroi keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Olympic Charleroi
Over / Under - Lommel United
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Lommel United is 90% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.69 pts / match - Olympic Charleroi · 1.31 pts / match - Lommel United
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Olympic Charleroi - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 13%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Lommel United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.4 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Olympic Charleroi
Lommel United
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).
Teams vs league
| Olympic Charleroi | Liga | Lommel United | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.81 | 2.73 | ▲ 3.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 44% | 53% | ▲ 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 50% | 50% | ▲ 69% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 27% | ▲ 31% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 81% | 74% | ▲ 88% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 63% | 79% | ▲ 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Olympic Charleroi 0 - 0 - 1 Lommel United. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Olympic Charleroi vs Lommel United?
The First Division B match finished Olympic Charleroi 1:2 Lommel United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Olympic Charleroi vs Lommel United?
Olympic Charleroi score 0.81 goals per game on average and Lommel United 2.00. The First Division B average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Olympic Charleroi's matches and 63% of Lommel United's.
What form are Olympic Charleroi and Lommel United in?
Over the last 5 games Olympic Charleroi have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Lommel United 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Olympic Charleroi vs Lommel United?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Olympic Charleroi vs Lommel United: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.