Olympic Charleroi vs Patro Eisden: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Olympic Charleroi played Patro Eisden in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 5 December 2025. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Olympic Charleroi: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Patro Eisden: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Olympic Charleroi scores 0.71 and concedes 2.07 goals per match. Patro Eisden scores 1.29 and concedes 1.07. League average: 2.73 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Olympic Charleroi 43%, Patro Eisden 50%. Over 2.5: Olympic Charleroi 50%, Patro Eisden 50%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Patro Eisden has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.38. Olympic Charleroi: 11.1 shots per match, Patro Eisden: 16.0.

Match halves

Olympic Charleroi: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.43. Patro Eisden: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.71.

Goals by minute

Olympic Charleroi: 76-90+ (4 goals). Patro Eisden: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.73 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
5Shots14
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
0Shots on target3
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
0.58xG1.6
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
2Corners3
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
34Dangerous attacks69
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
16Fouls15
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
3Cards1
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
0.71Goals scored / match1.29
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
2.07Goals conceded / match1.07
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
43%Average possession37%
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
4.07Shots on target / match5.07
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.07Shots per match16
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
4.07Shots on target5.07
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
6.5%Shot conversion8%
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
43%Possession37%
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
1.38xG for1.69
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
1.57xG against1.01
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden

Shooting quality

Olympic Charleroi: BalancedPatro Eisden: Attacking
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
Accuracy (shots on target)37%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.170.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Olympic Charleroi is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Olympic Charleroi · 1.4 pts / match - Patro Eisden

Olympic Charleroi
DDWLW
Season result split
14% W21% R64% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-9
0.64 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-7
Last 5 at home
0-1-4
LLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.94Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Patro Eisden
LDLWW
Season result split
50% W21% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-3-4
1.71 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-3
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WDWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.75Opponent xG: 0.93BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Patro Eisden is 82% better for: goals scored per match.

0.71 goals / match - Olympic Charleroi · 1.29 goals / match - Patro Eisden

Patro Eisden is 93% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.07 goals / match - Olympic Charleroi · 1.07 goals / match - Patro Eisden

Olympic Charleroi scoring profile: mixed

Olympic Charleroi scores in 50% of matches (7 of 14 matches), while Patro Eisden keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 matches).

Patro Eisden scoring profile: very strong

Patro Eisden scores in 64% of matches (9 of 14 matches), while Olympic Charleroi keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 matches).

10Goals scored (season)18
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
29Goals conceded (season)15
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
2.79Average goals in match2.36
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
8Goals scored (last 5)4
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
7Goals conceded (last 5)5
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal64%
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
7%2 goals50%
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
7%3 goals7%
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
7%4 goals7%
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal71%
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
57%2 goals36%
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
43%3 goals0%
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
14%4 goals0%
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

43%
Olympic Charleroi - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.6 of 14 matches
53%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time14%
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
7%BTTS in both halves0%
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
7%Scored in both halves21%
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
21%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
80%BTTS - last 540%
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

86%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time14%
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden

2nd half

64%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Patro Eisden is 102% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.64 pts / match - Olympic Charleroi · 1.29 pts / match - Patro Eisden

Olympic Charleroi - half-time state
14% leading21% draw64% trailing
Patro Eisden - half-time state
29% leading43% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.64Points per match (1st half)1.29
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
0.29Goals scored (1st half)0.57
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
1.07Goals conceded (1st half)0.43
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
1.36Average goals (1st half)1
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
29%Clean sheet before half-time57%
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
71%No goal before half-time64%
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden

After half-time (2nd half)

0.71Points per match (2nd half)1.29
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
0.43Goals scored (2nd half)0.71
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.64
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
1.43Average goals (2nd half)1.36
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
36%Clean sheet after half-time43%
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden
71%No goal after half-time50%
Olympic CharleroiPatro Eisden

Olympic Charleroi - second-half results

7% W50% R43% P
9
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.64
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 14%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Patro Eisden - second-half results

29% W43% R29% P
18
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding172%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Olympic Charleroi - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Patro Eisden - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.40
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.61.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Olympic Charleroi
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
2
5
16-30
1
6
31-45
1
4
46-60
1
4
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Patro Eisden
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
3
3
16-30
3
1
31-45
2
5
46-60
3
2
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.57
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
32%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
18%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Olympic Charleroi

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.67
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
53%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
149%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.96
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

Patro Eisden

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.68
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.46
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

Olympic CharleroiLigaPatro Eisden
Average goals in match 2.792.73 2.36
Both teams scored 43%53% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%50% 50%
Clean sheets 14%27% 29%
Goal before half-time 86%74% 64%
Goal after half-time 64%80% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.73
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / match
1.39
Away goals / match
+-4%
Home attack advantage
+-4%
Home defence advantage
+-3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Olympic CharleroiYellow cardKarl Junior Ndedi Kegne
  2. Patro EisdenYellow cardMilan Robberechts
  3. Olympic CharleroiYellow cardLuca Florica
  4. Olympic CharleroiYellow cardElias Spago
  5. Patro EisdenSubstitutionOn: Ridwane M'BarkiOff: Milan Robberechts
  6. Olympic CharleroiSubstitutionOn: Jonás Ramalho ChimenoOff: Hasan Jahić
  7. Patro EisdenSubstitutionOn: Vancy Roméo MabanzaOff: Nicolas Orye
  8. Patro EisdenSubstitutionOn: Raphaël Boakye SarfoOff: Amir Rais

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Michiel AllaertsMatches officiated: 11
5.36Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 236%Home wins27%Draws36%Away wins

FAQ

What was the result of Olympic Charleroi vs Patro Eisden?

The First Division B match finished Olympic Charleroi 0:0 Patro Eisden. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Olympic Charleroi vs Patro Eisden?

Olympic Charleroi score 0.71 goals per game on average and Patro Eisden 1.29. The First Division B average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Olympic Charleroi's matches and 50% of Patro Eisden's.

What form are Olympic Charleroi and Patro Eisden in?

Over the last 5 games Olympic Charleroi have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Patro Eisden 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Olympic Charleroi vs Patro Eisden?

The statistical background for Olympic Charleroi vs Patro Eisden — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.