Belgium - First Division BData current as of 06 September 2026

Olympic Charleroi vs RFC Seraing: match statistics

120%(2.25)
X30%(3.30)
250%(2.70)

RFC Seraing is in significantly better form than Olympic Charleroi, confirmed by their three-game winning streak in recent matches and a higher PPG (1.8 vs 0.8). The hosts present a disastrous disposition at their own stadium with an 85% loss rate in home games and a mere 0% win rate, making them the weakest home team in the league. Olympic Charleroi scores an average of only 0.31 goals per home match and fails to score in 69% of their fixtures, whereas RFC Seraing shows better attacking efficiency (5% shot conversion vs 3%) and a more solid defense on the road (1.38 goals conceded vs 2.23 for the hosts). The disparity in goal difference (-25 for the hosts in home games vs -10 for the visitors in away games) and the advantage in clean sheets (38% vs 8%) further support an RFC Seraing victory. Taking all statistics into account, the visitors hold a clear advantage and are the favorites for this clash.

Olympic Charleroi vs RFC Seraing: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Olympic Charleroi played RFC Seraing in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 11 March 2026. Final score: 2:4.

Current form

Olympic Charleroi: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. RFC Seraing: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Olympic Charleroi scores 0.81 and concedes 1.96 goals per match. RFC Seraing scores 1.04 and concedes 1.42. League average: 2.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Olympic Charleroi 46%, RFC Seraing 46%. Over 2.5: Olympic Charleroi 54%, RFC Seraing 50%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Olympic Charleroi: 11.8 shots per match, RFC Seraing: 11.7.

Match halves

Olympic Charleroi: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.46. RFC Seraing: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 0.69.

Goals by minute

Olympic Charleroi: 76-90+ (7 goals). RFC Seraing: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

RFC Seraing is in significantly better form than Olympic Charleroi, confirmed by their three-game winning streak in recent matches and a higher PPG (1.8 vs 0.8). The hosts present a disastrous disposition at their own stadium with an 85% loss rate in home games and a mere 0% win rate, making them the weakest home team in the league. Olympic Charleroi scores an average of only 0.31 goals per home match and fails to score in 69% of their fixtures, whereas RFC Seraing shows better attacking efficiency (5% shot conversion vs 3%) and a more solid defense on the road (1.38 goals conceded vs 2.23 for the hosts). The disparity in goal difference (-25 for the hosts in home games vs -10 for the visitors in away games) and the advantage in clean sheets (38% vs 8%) further support an RFC Seraing victory. Taking all statistics into account, the visitors hold a clear advantage and are the favorites for this clash.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
17Shots15
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
5Shots on target7
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
1.64xG1.73
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
1Corners1
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
30Dangerous attacks41
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
17Fouls7
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
1Cards2
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
0.81Goals scored / match1.04
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
1.96Goals conceded / match1.42
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
47%Average possession40%
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
4.12Shots on target / match3.77
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.81Shots per match11.73
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
4.12Shots on target3.77
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
6.8%Shot conversion8.9%
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
47%Possession40%
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
1.38xG for1.37
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
1.46xG against1.51
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing

Shooting quality

Olympic Charleroi: BalancedRFC Seraing: Balanced
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
Accuracy (shots on target)35%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.200.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

RFC Seraing is 125% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Olympic Charleroi · 1.8 pts / match - RFC Seraing

Olympic Charleroi
LDWLL
Season result split
12% W27% R62% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-7-16
0.62 pts / match · goal difference -30
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-2-11
Last 5 at home
0-1-4
DLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.11BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
RFC Seraing
LWLWW
Season result split
23% W31% R46% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-8-12
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-5-6
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LDLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.73BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

RFC Seraing is 28% better for: goals scored per match.

0.81 goals / match - Olympic Charleroi · 1.04 goals / match - RFC Seraing

RFC Seraing is 38% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.96 goals / match - Olympic Charleroi · 1.42 goals / match - RFC Seraing

Olympic Charleroi scoring profile: mixed

Olympic Charleroi scores in 50% of matches (13 of 26 matches), while RFC Seraing keeps a clean sheet in 27% (7 of 26 matches).

RFC Seraing scoring profile: very strong

RFC Seraing scores in 62% of matches (16 of 26 matches), while Olympic Charleroi keeps a clean sheet in 12% (3 of 26 matches).

21Goals scored (season)27
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
51Goals conceded (season)37
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
2.77Average goals in match2.46
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
4Goals scored (last 5)7
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
9Goals conceded (last 5)5
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal62%
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
15%2 goals27%
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
12%3 goals12%
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
4%4 goals4%
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal73%
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
62%2 goals46%
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
35%3 goals15%
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
8%4 goals4%
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

46%
Olympic Charleroi - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.12 of 26 matches
53%
League average

Goal patterns

23%BTTS at half-time19%
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
8%BTTS in both halves4%
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
15%Scored in both halves15%
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing

BTTS and goal count

35%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
19%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
40%BTTS - last 520%
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

81%Min. 1 goal before half-time58%
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time19%
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

RFC Seraing is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.73 pts / match - Olympic Charleroi · 0.77 pts / match - RFC Seraing

Olympic Charleroi - half-time state
12% leading38% draw50% trailing
RFC Seraing - half-time state
8% leading54% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.73Points per match (1st half)0.77
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
0.35Goals scored (1st half)0.35
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
0.88Goals conceded (1st half)0.69
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
1.23Average goals (1st half)1.04
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
31%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
65%No goal before half-time73%
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing

After half-time (2nd half)

0.69Points per match (2nd half)1.31
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
0.46Goals scored (2nd half)0.69
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
1.08Goals conceded (2nd half)0.62
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
1.54Average goals (2nd half)1.31
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
35%Clean sheet after half-time58%
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing
69%No goal after half-time50%
Olympic CharleroiRFC Seraing

Olympic Charleroi - second-half results

8% W46% R46% P
19
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-14
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
-16
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.73
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 12%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

RFC Seraing - second-half results

31% W38% R31% P
20
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.77
PPG before half-time
Lead holding288%

Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Olympic Charleroi - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.80
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
RFC Seraing - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.20
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Olympic Charleroi
ScoredConceded
3
8
0-15
4
6
16-30
2
9
31-45
2
8
46-60
3
9
61-75
7
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

RFC Seraing
ScoredConceded
5
7
0-15
2
6
16-30
2
8
31-45
5
4
46-60
5
4
61-75
8
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.62
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+53%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
31%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
19%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Olympic Charleroi

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.57
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
58%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
144%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

RFC Seraing

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.80
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

Olympic CharleroiLigaRFC Seraing
Average goals in match 2.772.75 2.46
Both teams scored 46%53% 46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 54%51% 50%
Clean sheets 12%27% 27%
Goal before half-time 81%71% 58%
Goal after half-time 69%78% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.75
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / match
1.36
Away goals / match
+2%
Home attack advantage
+2%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. RFC SeraingGoalMatthieu Muland Kayij
  2. RFC SeraingYellow cardMatteo Scarpinati
  3. RFC SeraingYellow cardEmmanuel Mutela Tshimbalanga
  4. Olympic CharleroiYellow cardJonás Ramalho Chimeno
  5. Olympic CharleroiGoalThomas EphestionAssist: Niklo Dailly
  6. RFC SeraingGoalÉdouard Soumah-Abbad
  7. RFC SeraingSubstitutionOn: Serigne Saliou FayeOff: Abdoulaye Agne Ba
  8. Olympic CharleroiSubstitutionOn: Mohamed M. MedfaiOff: Luca Florica
  9. RFC SeraingGoalMatthieu Muland Kayij
  10. Olympic CharleroiGoalJay David Mbalanda NziangAssist: Mohamed M. Medfai

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Olympic Charleroi 0 - 0 - 1 RFC Seraing. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

RFC Seraing
3 : 1
ROC de Charleroi-Marchienne

FAQ

What was the result of Olympic Charleroi vs RFC Seraing?

The First Division B match finished Olympic Charleroi 2:4 RFC Seraing. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Olympic Charleroi vs RFC Seraing?

Olympic Charleroi score 0.81 goals per game on average and RFC Seraing 1.04. The First Division B average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Olympic Charleroi's matches and 46% of RFC Seraing's.

What form are Olympic Charleroi and RFC Seraing in?

Over the last 5 games Olympic Charleroi have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and RFC Seraing 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Olympic Charleroi vs RFC Seraing?

The statistical background for Olympic Charleroi vs RFC Seraing — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.