Olympic El Qanah vs Abu Qair Semad: match statistics
Olympic El Qanah is displaying impressive form, sitting 1st in the table with a record of 16 wins, 7 draws, and only 1 loss. In their last 5 matches, the hosts have secured 13 points (4 wins, 1 draw) without conceding a single goal, demonstrating exceptional defensive solidity. At their home stadium, Olympic El Qanah boasts a 55% win rate and concedes only 0.82 goals per match, making them a tough opponent for any team. Abu Qair Semad, despite sitting in 3rd place, is in poorer form – earning just 6 points in their last 5 games (1 win, 3 draws, 1 loss) and having a significantly lower points-per-game average (1.2 vs 2.6). Given the hosts' advantage in form, goal difference, and defensive reliability, a result favoring Olympic El Qanah is predicted, though their tendency to draw (45% in home matches) increases the likelihood of points being shared.
Olympic El Qanah vs Abu Qair Semad: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Olympic El Qanah played Abu Qair Semad in Second Division (Egypt). The match was played on 6 March 2026. Final score: 3:0.
Current form
Olympic El Qanah: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Abu Qair Semad: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Olympic El Qanah scores 1.54 and concedes 0.42 goals per match. Abu Qair Semad scores 1.17 and concedes 0.79. League average: 1.84 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Olympic El Qanah 33%, Abu Qair Semad 46%. Over 2.5: Olympic El Qanah 29%, Abu Qair Semad 33%. League level: BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 28%.
xG, shots and style
Abu Qair Semad has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.48. Olympic El Qanah: 9.9 shots per match, Abu Qair Semad: 7.8.
Match halves
Olympic El Qanah: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 0.96. Abu Qair Semad: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.54.
Goals by minute
Olympic El Qanah: 76-90+ (13 goals). Abu Qair Semad: 0-15 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second Division: 1.84 goals per match, BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 28%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Olympic El Qanah is displaying impressive form, sitting 1st in the table with a record of 16 wins, 7 draws, and only 1 loss. In their last 5 matches, the hosts have secured 13 points (4 wins, 1 draw) without conceding a single goal, demonstrating exceptional defensive solidity. At their home stadium, Olympic El Qanah boasts a 55% win rate and concedes only 0.82 goals per match, making them a tough opponent for any team. Abu Qair Semad, despite sitting in 3rd place, is in poorer form – earning just 6 points in their last 5 games (1 win, 3 draws, 1 loss) and having a significantly lower points-per-game average (1.2 vs 2.6). Given the hosts' advantage in form, goal difference, and defensive reliability, a result favoring Olympic El Qanah is predicted, though their tendency to draw (45% in home matches) increases the likelihood of points being shared.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Olympic El Qanah | Abu Qair Semad | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 47% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.19 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Olympic El Qanah is 117% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / match - Olympic El Qanah · 1.2 pts / match - Abu Qair Semad
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Olympic El Qanah is 32% better for: goals scored per match.
1.54 goals / match - Olympic El Qanah · 1.17 goals / match - Abu Qair Semad
Olympic El Qanah is 88% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.42 goals / match - Olympic El Qanah · 0.79 goals / match - Abu Qair Semad
Olympic El Qanah scores in 88% of matches (21 of 24 matches), while Abu Qair Semad keeps a clean sheet in 42% (10 of 24 matches).
Abu Qair Semad scores in 75% of matches (18 of 24 matches), while Olympic El Qanah keeps a clean sheet in 63% (15 of 24 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Olympic El Qanah
Over / Under - Abu Qair Semad
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Olympic El Qanah is 32% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.75 pts / match - Olympic El Qanah · 1.33 pts / match - Abu Qair Semad
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Olympic El Qanah - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Abu Qair Semad - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 100% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Olympic El Qanah
Abu Qair Semad
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Olympic El Qanah | Liga | Abu Qair Semad | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 1.96 | 1.84 | ▲ 1.96 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 39% | ▲ 46% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 29% | 28% | ▲ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 63% | 40% | ▲ 42% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 54% | 51% | ▲ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 79% | 65% | ▼ 63% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Olympic El QanahGoalMostafa Hamada Abdel Kader
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Olympic El Qanah 0 - 0 - 1 Abu Qair Semad. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Olympic El Qanah vs Abu Qair Semad?
The Second Division match finished Olympic El Qanah 3:0 Abu Qair Semad. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Olympic El Qanah vs Abu Qair Semad?
Olympic El Qanah score 1.54 goals per game on average and Abu Qair Semad 1.17. The Second Division average is 1.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Olympic El Qanah's matches and 46% of Abu Qair Semad's.
What form are Olympic El Qanah and Abu Qair Semad in?
Over the last 5 games Olympic El Qanah have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Abu Qair Semad 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Olympic El Qanah vs Abu Qair Semad?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.