Olympic El Qanah vs Proxy: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Olympic El Qanah played Proxy in Second Division (Egypt). The match was played on 18 December 2025. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Olympic El Qanah: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Proxy: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Olympic El Qanah scores 1.60 and concedes 0.60 goals per match. Proxy scores 1.07 and concedes 1.07. League average: 1.91 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Olympic El Qanah 47%, Proxy 67%. Over 2.5: Olympic El Qanah 33%, Proxy 40%. League level: BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 30%.

xG, shots and style

Olympic El Qanah has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.40. Olympic El Qanah: 10.5 shots per match, Proxy: 6.9.

Match halves

Olympic El Qanah: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 0.87. Proxy: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

Olympic El Qanah: 76-90+ (7 goals). Proxy: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 1.91 goals per match, BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 30%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Olympic El QanahProxy
-1Shots-1
Olympic El QanahProxy
-1Shots on target-1
Olympic El QanahProxy
0xG0
Olympic El QanahProxy
-1Corners-1
Olympic El QanahProxy
0Dangerous attacks0
Olympic El QanahProxy
-1Fouls-1
Olympic El QanahProxy
-1Cards-1
Olympic El QanahProxy

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Olympic El QanahProxy
1.6Goals scored / match1.07
Olympic El QanahProxy
0.6Goals conceded / match1.07
Olympic El QanahProxy
46%Average possession37%
Olympic El QanahProxy
4.6Shots on target / match2.6
Olympic El QanahProxy

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.47Shots per match6.87
Olympic El QanahProxy
4.6Shots on target2.6
Olympic El QanahProxy
15.3%Shot conversion15.5%
Olympic El QanahProxy
46%Possession37%
Olympic El QanahProxy
1.53xG for1.4
Olympic El QanahProxy
1.14xG against1.31
Olympic El QanahProxy

Shooting quality

Olympic El Qanah: Counter-attackingProxy: Counter-attacking
Olympic El QanahProxy
Accuracy (shots on target)44%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.20
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.41

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Olympic El Qanah is 57% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - Olympic El Qanah · 1.4 pts / match - Proxy

Olympic El Qanah
DDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
53% W40% D7% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-6-1
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-5-0
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
DDWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.80Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Proxy
WLWDL
Season result split
33% W47% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-7-3
1.47 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-4-2
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WLDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Olympic El Qanah is 50% better for: goals scored per match.

1.6 goals / match - Olympic El Qanah · 1.07 goals / match - Proxy

Olympic El Qanah is 78% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.6 goals / match - Olympic El Qanah · 1.07 goals / match - Proxy

Olympic El Qanah scoring profile: very strong

Olympic El Qanah scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while Proxy keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 matches).

Proxy scoring profile: strong

Proxy scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while Olympic El Qanah keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).

24Goals scored (season)16
Olympic El QanahProxy
9Goals conceded (season)16
Olympic El QanahProxy
2.2Average goals in match2.13
Olympic El QanahProxy
8Goals scored (last 5)6
Olympic El QanahProxy
2Goals conceded (last 5)8
Olympic El QanahProxy

How often they score at least...

87%1 goal80%
Olympic El QanahProxy
47%2 goals20%
Olympic El QanahProxy
20%3 goals7%
Olympic El QanahProxy
7%4 goals0%
Olympic El QanahProxy

How often they concede at least...

53%1 goal67%
Olympic El QanahProxy
7%2 goals27%
Olympic El QanahProxy
0%3 goals7%
Olympic El QanahProxy
0%4 goals7%
Olympic El QanahProxy

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

39%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time40%
Olympic El QanahProxy
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Olympic El QanahProxy
27%Scored in both halves7%
Olympic El QanahProxy

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
Olympic El QanahProxy
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Olympic El QanahProxy
40%BTTS - last 580%
Olympic El QanahProxy

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time53%
Olympic El QanahProxy
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
Olympic El QanahProxy
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
Olympic El QanahProxy

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
Olympic El QanahProxy
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time20%
Olympic El QanahProxy
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
Olympic El QanahProxy

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Olympic El Qanah is 134% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.87 pts / match - Olympic El Qanah · 0.8 pts / match - Proxy

Olympic El Qanah - half-time state
47% leading47% draw7% trailing
Proxy - half-time state
0% leading80% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.87Points per match (1st half)0.8
Olympic El QanahProxy
0.73Goals scored (1st half)0.4
Olympic El QanahProxy
0.2Goals conceded (1st half)0.6
Olympic El QanahProxy
0.93Average goals (1st half)1
Olympic El QanahProxy
80%Clean sheet before half-time47%
Olympic El QanahProxy
47%No goal before half-time60%
Olympic El QanahProxy

After half-time (2nd half)

1.67Points per match (2nd half)1.73
Olympic El QanahProxy
0.87Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
Olympic El QanahProxy
0.4Goals conceded (2nd half)0.47
Olympic El QanahProxy
1.27Average goals (2nd half)1.13
Olympic El QanahProxy
67%Clean sheet after half-time67%
Olympic El QanahProxy
40%No goal after half-time53%
Olympic El QanahProxy

Olympic El Qanah - second-half results

47% W27% D27% L
28
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.87
PPG before half-time
Lead holding113%

Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Proxy - second-half results

47% W33% D20% L
12
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.80
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Olympic El Qanah - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.60
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.0
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+1+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Proxy - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.40
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Olympic El Qanah
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
3
0
16-30
6
3
31-45
4
3
46-60
2
0
61-75
7
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Proxy
ScoredConceded
2
5
0-15
1
1
16-30
3
3
31-45
2
2
46-60
2
3
61-75
6
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.17
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
114%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
70%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Olympic El Qanah

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.39
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.61
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
167%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
64%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Proxy

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
114%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
111%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

Olympic El QanahLigaProxy
Average goals in match 2.201.91 2.13
Both teams scored 47%39% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%30% 40%
Clean sheets 47%39% 33%
Goal before half-time 60%51% 53%
Goal after half-time 80%68% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.91
Average goals per match
39%
Both teams scored
30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
0.96
Home goals / match
0.94
Away goals / match
+2%
Home attack advantage
+2%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
51%
1 goal
20%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Olympic El Qanah vs Proxy?

The Second Division match finished Olympic El Qanah 2:1 Proxy. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Olympic El Qanah vs Proxy?

Olympic El Qanah score 1.60 goals per game on average and Proxy 1.07. The Second Division average is 1.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Olympic El Qanah's matches and 67% of Proxy's.

What form are Olympic El Qanah and Proxy in?

Over the last 5 games Olympic El Qanah have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Proxy 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Olympic El Qanah vs Proxy?

The statistical background for Olympic El Qanah vs Proxy — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.