Olympic Safi vs FUS Rabat: match statistics
Olympic Safi vs FUS Rabat: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Olympic Safi played FUS Rabat in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 11 May 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Olympic Safi: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. FUS Rabat: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Olympic Safi scores 0.84 and concedes 1.58 goals per match. FUS Rabat scores 1.21 and concedes 1.32. League average: 2.17 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Olympic Safi 68%, FUS Rabat 53%. Over 2.5: Olympic Safi 47%, FUS Rabat 37%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 38%.
xG, shots and style
FUS Rabat has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.22. Olympic Safi: 9.6 shots per match, FUS Rabat: 10.4.
Match halves
Olympic Safi: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.47. FUS Rabat: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.63.
Goals by minute
Olympic Safi: 31-45+ (5 goals). FUS Rabat: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Botola Pro: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 38%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
FUS Rabat are the favorites: they sit 8th vs Olympic Safi’s 16th and have 7 wins this season compared to only 2 for the hosts. In the last 5 matches the visitors recorded 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, scoring 6 and conceding 5 (averaging 2.0 points per game), while the hosts have not won any of their last 5 (0-2-3), scoring 5 and conceding 9 (averaging 0.4 points per game). Home side advantages include higher possession (55%) and slightly higher home xG (1.34 vs 1.24), as well as more shots (10.44 vs 9.8) and shots on target (3.56 vs 3.3); however Olympic show low finishing efficiency — only 7% conversion and 0.78 goals per home game. FUS compensate with efficiency: 12% shot conversion and 1.2 goals per away game, and in the last five matches the visitors’ defense conceded 5 goals versus 9 for the hosts, indicating better form and greater short-term effectiveness. Considering FUS’s edge in efficiency (12% vs 7%), superior form (2.0 points per game vs 0.4) and better win record (7 vs 2), I project an away win; probabilities: away 60%, draw 25%, home 15%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes because Olympic Safi has a seasonal BTTS rate of 67% and BTTS occurred in 100% of their last 5 matches, strongly indicating the home side both scores and concedes. The hosts generate on average xG 1.46 and 4.22 shots on target with an average of 1.22 goals per game, while FUS Rabat has xG_against 1.33 and concedes on average 1.5 goals this season, so both teams present offensive and defensive factors that favor goals. The visitors have a seasonal BTTS rate of 40% and 40% in their last 5 matches, but in their last 5 performances they have xG_for 1.4 and scored 6 goals (1.2 per game), providing a realistic chance to score. Clean sheets are also rare: hosts 22% and visitors 20%, the league averages 2.17 goals per match, and Olympic Safi concedes on average 1.8 goals in their last 5 games, which increases the probability of both teams scoring. Therefore I estimate the probability of BTTS at about 72% versus 28% for No Goal, based on the strong home signal 67%/100% and the improvement in the visitors’ offense (xG 1.4 recently).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project 1.40 expected goals for Olympic Safi and 1.19 for FUS Rabat, totaling 2.59 xG for the match. This aligns with seasonal stats: Safi scores 1.22 goals per game on average (xG 1.46), FUS 1.20 goals (xG 1.24), and the teams concede 1.11 and 1.50 goals respectively, which supports a higher combined total. A Poisson model based on total xG=2.59 yields probability for Over 1.5 goals of around 73% (P≥2), Over 2.5 goals around 48% (P≥3), and Over 3.5 goals around 26% (P≥4). Additionally, Safi has 78% of matches over 1.5, FUS 70%, and Safi averages 4.22 shots on target versus 3.3 for FUS, increasing the likelihood of at least 2 goals. For these reasons I recommend playing Over 1.5 — it is the strongest signal, as the 73% chance clearly exceeds 48% for Over 2.5 and 26% for Over 3.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time is the most likely scenario: the home side were level at the break in 44% of matches and the visitors in 40%, giving roughly a 42% chance of a draw after 45 minutes. At the same time the hosts won 44% of their home games and led at the break in 33% of cases; when leading after 45 minutes they converted that into a final victory in 56% of situations, hence 1/1 has the largest single share (~18%). If the match is tied at half-time, taking into account the seasonal distribution of results (44% home wins, 33% draws, 22% away wins) and the visitors’ good form in the last 5 matches (60% wins), I adopted a final distribution favoring the home side (about 40% home win, 30% draw and 30% away win), which yields X/1 ≈17%, X/X ≈12% and X/2 ≈13%. Scenarios where the home side lead at the break but lose at full-time (1/2) and vice versa (2/1) are judged unlikely (around 5% each), because the hosts tend to hold their lead in most cases (56%), and turnarounds are less common. In summary, the strongest signal is 1/1 at approximately 18% probability, with further significant options being X/1 (17%) and draw/draw (12–13%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Olympic Safi | FUS Rabat | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
FUS Rabat is 400% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / match - Olympic Safi · 2 pts / match - FUS Rabat
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FUS Rabat is 44% better for: goals scored per match.
0.84 goals / match - Olympic Safi · 1.21 goals / match - FUS Rabat
FUS Rabat is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.58 goals / match - Olympic Safi · 1.32 goals / match - FUS Rabat
Olympic Safi scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while FUS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 21% (4 of 19 matches).
FUS Rabat scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while Olympic Safi keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 19 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Olympic Safi
Over / Under - FUS Rabat
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FUS Rabat is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.05 pts / match - Olympic Safi · 1.37 pts / match - FUS Rabat
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Olympic Safi - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 11%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
FUS Rabat - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Olympic Safi
FUS Rabat
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| Olympic Safi | Liga | FUS Rabat | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.42 | 2.17 | ▲ 2.53 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 68% | 50% | ▲ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 47% | 38% | • 37% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 11% | 31% | ▼ 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 63% | 61% | ▲ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 89% | 75% | ▲ 84% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Olympic Safi 0 - 0 - 1 FUS Rabat. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Olympic Safi vs FUS Rabat?
The Botola Pro match finished Olympic Safi 1:1 FUS Rabat. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Olympic Safi vs FUS Rabat?
Olympic Safi score 0.84 goals per game on average and FUS Rabat 1.21. The Botola Pro average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 68% of Olympic Safi's matches and 53% of FUS Rabat's.
What form are Olympic Safi and FUS Rabat in?
Over the last 5 games Olympic Safi have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and FUS Rabat 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Olympic Safi vs FUS Rabat?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


