Morocco - Botola ProData current as of 07 September 2026

Olympic Safi vs Ittihad Tanger: match statistics

Olympic Safi crest
Olympic Safi
1 : 2half-time 1:0
Ittihad Tanger crest
Ittihad Tanger

Olympic Safi vs Ittihad Tanger: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Olympic Safi played Ittihad Tanger in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 29 April 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Olympic Safi: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Ittihad Tanger: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Olympic Safi scores 0.81 and concedes 1.56 goals per match. Ittihad Tanger scores 0.75 and concedes 1.25. League average: 2.13 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Olympic Safi 63%, Ittihad Tanger 56%. Over 2.5: Olympic Safi 44%, Ittihad Tanger 25%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 36%.

xG, shots and style

Ittihad Tanger has higher xG: 1.26 vs 1.23. Olympic Safi: 9.9 shots per match, Ittihad Tanger: 10.2.

Match halves

Olympic Safi: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.50. Ittihad Tanger: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Olympic Safi: 76-90+ (5 goals). Ittihad Tanger: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Botola Pro: 2.13 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 36%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Olympic Safi (14th) and Ittihad Tanger (13th) have similar season records — both teams have 2 wins, but the home side recorded 6 draws and 8 losses while the visitors have 8 draws and 6 losses. In the last 5 matches Olympic scored 6 goals and has a 1-3-1 record (PPG 1.2), whereas Ittihad scored 3 goals and is 0-2-3 (PPG 0.4), which clearly favors the hosts in form. The hosts dominate possession (55% vs 49%), take slightly more shots on target per game (3.38 vs 3.13) and are less likely to finish matches goalless (FTS 25% vs 50%), indicating they create higher-quality chances. On the other hand the visitors have conceded 20 goals this season versus 25 for Safi and have comparable xG values (xG 1.33 for away Ittihad vs 1.34 xG for the hosts), which limits the home advantage. Considering better form, greater possession and a lower rate of scoreless games for Olympic, I predict a home win (60%), draw 25%, away win 15%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I back BTTS - Yes based on the data: season BTTS rates are 63% for Olympic Safi and 50% for Ittihad Tanger versus a league average of 48%. Both teams average 0.75 goals per match this season but produce xG of 1.18 (Safi) and 1.33 (Ittihad), indicating a finishing deficit of ~0.43 and ~0.58 xG respectively. In the last 5 matches BTTS is 80% for the home side vs 60% for the visitors, and average goals in the last 5 are 1.2 (Safi) vs 0.6 (Ittihad), showing offensive improvement from the hosts. Additionally both teams concede over 1 goal per game this season (1.13 and 1.38) and the visitors have 0% clean sheets vs 25% for the hosts, which increases the likelihood both teams will score; hence a 70% Yes / 30% No rating.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG-based model projects approximately 2.67 expected goals: home xG 1.18 vs. opponents’ average xG conceded 1.42 → expected ~1.30 for Olympic Safi; away xG 1.33 vs. home average xG conceded 1.41 → ~1.37 for Ittihad Tanger. Historically both teams have 75% of matches over 1.5 goals, while only 25% exceed 2.5, which strongly favors the 1.5 line and weakens the signal for 2.5. Season-to-date goal numbers are low: home 0.75 goals and away 0.75 (total 1.50), with low shots on target 2.38 and 3.13 and shot conversion rates of 8% and 7%, limiting xG realization. The percentage of matches where both teams scored is 63% for the home side and 50% for the away side, which raises the probability of at least two goals but not necessarily three. As a result I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest play (estimated 80% over / 20% under); Over 2.5 I view as too risky (45%/55%), and Over 3.5 is unlikely (10%/90%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The hosts were level at the break in 75% of their matches and kept a clean sheet at half-time in 75% of games, which significantly increases the probability of a draw after 45 minutes. In the last five matches Olympic Safi averages 1.2 points per game compared to Ittihad Tanger's 0.4, and by half-time the hosts scored 7 goals in those five fixtures (1.4 per game) while the visitors managed only 3 (0.6 per game). Quality-of-chance metrics show balance: the hosts’ xG is 1.18 versus the visitors’ 1.33, with xG against at 1.41 vs 1.42, indicating a low and similar number of clear opportunities. Considering the high share of half-time draws (around 75%) and the hosts’ better recent form, the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a home turnaround by full-time (X/1). I estimate a 30% probability for X/1, 23% for X/X, and collectively the half-time draw options (X/1, X/X, X/2) amount to about a 65% probability, with the remaining scenarios split into smaller shares.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
10Shots12
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
5Shots on target7
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
1.32xG1.56
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
1Corners4
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
46Dangerous attacks43
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
10Fouls14
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
5Cards2
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
0.81Goals scored / match0.75
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
1.56Goals conceded / match1.25
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
51%Average possession52%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
3.13Shots on target / match2.75
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.88Shots per match10.19
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
3.13Shots on target2.75
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
8.2%Shot conversion7.4%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
51%Possession52%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
1.23xG for1.26
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
1.37xG against1.42
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger

Shooting quality

Olympic Safi: BalancedIttihad Tanger: Balanced
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
Accuracy (shots on target)32%27%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Olympic Safi is 150% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Olympic Safi · 0.4 pts / match - Ittihad Tanger

Olympic Safi
LDWLD
Season result split
13% W38% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-6-8
0.75 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-3-4
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LLDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.66BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Ittihad Tanger
LLDLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
13% W50% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-8-6
0.88 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-4
Last 5 away
1-1-3
WLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 1.11BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Olympic Safi is 8% better for: goals scored per match.

0.81 goals / match - Olympic Safi · 0.75 goals / match - Ittihad Tanger

Ittihad Tanger is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.56 goals / match - Olympic Safi · 1.25 goals / match - Ittihad Tanger

Olympic Safi scoring profile: very strong

Olympic Safi scores in 69% of matches (11 of 16 matches), while Ittihad Tanger keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 16 matches).

Ittihad Tanger scoring profile: very strong

Ittihad Tanger scores in 63% of matches (10 of 16 matches), while Olympic Safi keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 16 matches).

13Goals scored (season)12
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
25Goals conceded (season)20
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
2.38Average goals in match2
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
6Goals scored (last 5)3
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
8Goals conceded (last 5)7
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger

How often they score at least...

69%1 goal63%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
6%2 goals13%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
6%3 goals0%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
0%4 goals0%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal88%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
44%2 goals31%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
19%3 goals6%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
6%4 goals0%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

48%
League average

Goal patterns

6%BTTS at half-time6%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
0%Scored in both halves6%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger

BTTS and goal count

31%Min. 3 goals and BTTS19%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
80%BTTS - last 560%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
19%Min. 2 goals before half-time13%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ittihad Tanger is 23% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.81 pts / match - Olympic Safi · 1 pts / match - Ittihad Tanger

Olympic Safi - half-time state
13% leading44% draw44% trailing
Ittihad Tanger - half-time state
19% leading44% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.81Points per match (1st half)1
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
0.31Goals scored (1st half)0.25
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
0.56Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
0.88Average goals (1st half)0.75
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
50%Clean sheet before half-time56%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
81%No goal before half-time75%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger

After half-time (2nd half)

0.88Points per match (2nd half)1
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1.25
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
31%Clean sheet after half-time38%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
50%No goal after half-time56%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger

Olympic Safi - second-half results

19% W31% R50% P
13
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.81
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 13%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ittihad Tanger - second-half results

19% W44% R38% P
16
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding68%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 13%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Olympic Safi - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.40
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Ittihad Tanger - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.60
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match0.61.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Olympic Safi
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
3
16-30
4
5
31-45
1
6
46-60
2
4
61-75
5
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Ittihad Tanger
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
2
1
16-30
1
6
31-45
2
5
46-60
2
4
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.19
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-9%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
43%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Olympic Safi

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.61
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
154%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

Ittihad Tanger

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.51
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.48
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

Olympic SafiLigaIttihad Tanger
Average goals in match 2.382.13 2.00
Both teams scored 63%48% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 44%36% 25%
Clean sheets 13%33% 13%
Goal before half-time 63%59% 63%
Goal after half-time 88%74% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.13
Average goals per match
48%
Both teams scored
36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.12
Home goals / match
1.01
Away goals / match
+11%
Home attack advantage
+10%
Home defence advantage
+12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Olympic SafiYellow cardSaad Morsli
  2. Ittihad TangerYellow cardMohamed El Arouch
  3. Olympic SafiYellow cardYoussef El Motie
  4. Olympic SafiYellow cardYounes Najjari
  5. Olympic SafiYellow cardImad Khannouss
  6. Olympic SafiGoalYounes NajjariAssist: Imad Khannouss
  7. Olympic SafiSubstitutionOn: Moussa KonéOff: Salaheddine Saadaoui
  8. Ittihad TangerSubstitutionOn: Faouzi Abd El MouttalibOff: Hamza El Moudene
  9. Ittihad TangerSubstitutionOn: Adam DaraziOff: Siriki Sanogo
  10. Olympic SafiSubstitutionOn: Achref HabbassiOff: Imad Khannouss
  11. Olympic SafiYellow cardWalid Atik
  12. Ittihad TangerGoalPapa Magueye GayeAssist: Abdel Hamid Maâli
  13. Ittihad TangerYellow cardPapa Magueye Gaye
  14. Ittihad TangerGoalKarim LagrouchAssist: Haitam El Bahja

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Olympic Safi 0 - 1 - 0 Ittihad Tanger. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Ittihad Tanger
1 : 1
Olympic Safi

FAQ

What was the result of Olympic Safi vs Ittihad Tanger?

The Botola Pro match finished Olympic Safi 1:2 Ittihad Tanger. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Olympic Safi vs Ittihad Tanger?

Olympic Safi score 0.81 goals per game on average and Ittihad Tanger 0.75. The Botola Pro average is 2.13 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Olympic Safi's matches and 56% of Ittihad Tanger's.

What form are Olympic Safi and Ittihad Tanger in?

Over the last 5 games Olympic Safi have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Ittihad Tanger 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Olympic Safi vs Ittihad Tanger?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.