Olympic Safi vs Ittihad Tanger: match statistics
Olympic Safi vs Ittihad Tanger: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Olympic Safi played Ittihad Tanger in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 29 April 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Olympic Safi: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Ittihad Tanger: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Olympic Safi scores 0.81 and concedes 1.56 goals per match. Ittihad Tanger scores 0.75 and concedes 1.25. League average: 2.13 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Olympic Safi 63%, Ittihad Tanger 56%. Over 2.5: Olympic Safi 44%, Ittihad Tanger 25%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 36%.
xG, shots and style
Ittihad Tanger has higher xG: 1.26 vs 1.23. Olympic Safi: 9.9 shots per match, Ittihad Tanger: 10.2.
Match halves
Olympic Safi: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.50. Ittihad Tanger: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.50.
Goals by minute
Olympic Safi: 76-90+ (5 goals). Ittihad Tanger: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Botola Pro: 2.13 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 36%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Olympic Safi (14th) and Ittihad Tanger (13th) have similar season records — both teams have 2 wins, but the home side recorded 6 draws and 8 losses while the visitors have 8 draws and 6 losses. In the last 5 matches Olympic scored 6 goals and has a 1-3-1 record (PPG 1.2), whereas Ittihad scored 3 goals and is 0-2-3 (PPG 0.4), which clearly favors the hosts in form. The hosts dominate possession (55% vs 49%), take slightly more shots on target per game (3.38 vs 3.13) and are less likely to finish matches goalless (FTS 25% vs 50%), indicating they create higher-quality chances. On the other hand the visitors have conceded 20 goals this season versus 25 for Safi and have comparable xG values (xG 1.33 for away Ittihad vs 1.34 xG for the hosts), which limits the home advantage. Considering better form, greater possession and a lower rate of scoreless games for Olympic, I predict a home win (60%), draw 25%, away win 15%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes based on the data: season BTTS rates are 63% for Olympic Safi and 50% for Ittihad Tanger versus a league average of 48%. Both teams average 0.75 goals per match this season but produce xG of 1.18 (Safi) and 1.33 (Ittihad), indicating a finishing deficit of ~0.43 and ~0.58 xG respectively. In the last 5 matches BTTS is 80% for the home side vs 60% for the visitors, and average goals in the last 5 are 1.2 (Safi) vs 0.6 (Ittihad), showing offensive improvement from the hosts. Additionally both teams concede over 1 goal per game this season (1.13 and 1.38) and the visitors have 0% clean sheets vs 25% for the hosts, which increases the likelihood both teams will score; hence a 70% Yes / 30% No rating.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model projects approximately 2.67 expected goals: home xG 1.18 vs. opponents’ average xG conceded 1.42 → expected ~1.30 for Olympic Safi; away xG 1.33 vs. home average xG conceded 1.41 → ~1.37 for Ittihad Tanger. Historically both teams have 75% of matches over 1.5 goals, while only 25% exceed 2.5, which strongly favors the 1.5 line and weakens the signal for 2.5. Season-to-date goal numbers are low: home 0.75 goals and away 0.75 (total 1.50), with low shots on target 2.38 and 3.13 and shot conversion rates of 8% and 7%, limiting xG realization. The percentage of matches where both teams scored is 63% for the home side and 50% for the away side, which raises the probability of at least two goals but not necessarily three. As a result I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest play (estimated 80% over / 20% under); Over 2.5 I view as too risky (45%/55%), and Over 3.5 is unlikely (10%/90%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The hosts were level at the break in 75% of their matches and kept a clean sheet at half-time in 75% of games, which significantly increases the probability of a draw after 45 minutes. In the last five matches Olympic Safi averages 1.2 points per game compared to Ittihad Tanger's 0.4, and by half-time the hosts scored 7 goals in those five fixtures (1.4 per game) while the visitors managed only 3 (0.6 per game). Quality-of-chance metrics show balance: the hosts’ xG is 1.18 versus the visitors’ 1.33, with xG against at 1.41 vs 1.42, indicating a low and similar number of clear opportunities. Considering the high share of half-time draws (around 75%) and the hosts’ better recent form, the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a home turnaround by full-time (X/1). I estimate a 30% probability for X/1, 23% for X/X, and collectively the half-time draw options (X/1, X/X, X/2) amount to about a 65% probability, with the remaining scenarios split into smaller shares.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Olympic Safi | Ittihad Tanger | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 27% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Olympic Safi is 150% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Olympic Safi · 0.4 pts / match - Ittihad Tanger
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Olympic Safi is 8% better for: goals scored per match.
0.81 goals / match - Olympic Safi · 0.75 goals / match - Ittihad Tanger
Ittihad Tanger is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.56 goals / match - Olympic Safi · 1.25 goals / match - Ittihad Tanger
Olympic Safi scores in 69% of matches (11 of 16 matches), while Ittihad Tanger keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 16 matches).
Ittihad Tanger scores in 63% of matches (10 of 16 matches), while Olympic Safi keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 16 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Olympic Safi
Over / Under - Ittihad Tanger
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Ittihad Tanger is 23% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.81 pts / match - Olympic Safi · 1 pts / match - Ittihad Tanger
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Olympic Safi - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 13%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Ittihad Tanger - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 13%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Olympic Safi
Ittihad Tanger
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| Olympic Safi | Liga | Ittihad Tanger | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.38 | 2.13 | ▼ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 48% | ▲ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 44% | 36% | ▼ 25% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 33% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 63% | 59% | ▲ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 74% | • 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Olympic Safi 0 - 1 - 0 Ittihad Tanger. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Olympic Safi vs Ittihad Tanger?
The Botola Pro match finished Olympic Safi 1:2 Ittihad Tanger. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Olympic Safi vs Ittihad Tanger?
Olympic Safi score 0.81 goals per game on average and Ittihad Tanger 0.75. The Botola Pro average is 2.13 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Olympic Safi's matches and 56% of Ittihad Tanger's.
What form are Olympic Safi and Ittihad Tanger in?
Over the last 5 games Olympic Safi have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Ittihad Tanger 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Olympic Safi vs Ittihad Tanger?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


