Olympic Safi vs Yacoub El Mansour: match statistics
Olympic Safi vs Yacoub El Mansour: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Olympic Safi played Yacoub El Mansour in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 21 June 2026. Venue: Stade El Massira. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Olympic Safi: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Yacoub El Mansour: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Olympic Safi scores 0.80 and concedes 1.40 goals per match. Yacoub El Mansour scores 1.08 and concedes 1.56. League average: 2.15 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Olympic Safi 64%, Yacoub El Mansour 76%. Over 2.5: Olympic Safi 40%, Yacoub El Mansour 56%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 38%.
xG, shots and style
Yacoub El Mansour has higher xG: 1.32 vs 1.26. Olympic Safi: 10.0 shots per match, Yacoub El Mansour: 10.6.
Match halves
Olympic Safi: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.44. Yacoub El Mansour: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.64.
Goals by minute
Olympic Safi: 31-45+ (6 goals). Yacoub El Mansour: 61-75 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Botola Pro: 2.15 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 38%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Olympic Safi (16th) and Yacoub El Mansour (14th) meet in a balanced, low-scoring affair; Safi this season: 3 wins, 10 draws, 12 losses, 20 goals for, 35 against; visitors: 4-8-13 with a 27-39 record. At home Safi averages 0.83 goals, 10.33 shots (3.58 on target) and xG 1.35, while the visitors on the road have 0.92 goals, 9.25 shots (3.33 on target) and xG 1.22, so Safi marginally creates better chances. Defensively the hosts are stronger at home — conceding 1.42 goals per match and keeping a clean sheet in 25% of games, whereas the visitors concede 1.58 away and only keep a clean sheet in 8% of matches. In the last five matches Safi scored 3 goals and averaged 1.0 point per game, while Yacoub El Mansour scored 6 but conceded 8 and average only 0.8 points per game, indicating greater defensive instability for the visitors. Considering the higher home xG (1.35 vs 1.22), better defensive efficiency and lower share of matches without scoring (17% vs 33%), I back the home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal indicators strongly favor BTTS: the home side has BTTS at 85% and the away side 67%, averaging 76%, well above the league average of 51%. Both teams rarely keep a clean sheet — clean sheet percentage is 8% for each — and seasonally the home team scored 20 and conceded 35 goals, while the away team scored 27 and conceded 39, confirming weak defensive lines. In the last 5 matches we have mixed signals: the home team has BTTS in only 40% of games and averages 0.6 goals scored with 0.8 conceded, whereas the away team has BTTS in 100% of their last 5 and averages 1.2 goals scored with 1.6 conceded. xG and shots stats point to an open game — home xG for attack is 1.42 vs 1.22 for the away, opponent xG is 1.14 for both teams, and shots on target are 3.62 vs 3.33 per match. Considering the seasonal 76% average BTTS, low 8% clean sheets and the fact both sides concede on average over 1.5 goals (1.54 and 1.58), I forecast BTTS - Yes at 74% versus 26% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project approximately 2.53 goals in the match (1.33 for Olympic Safi vs 1.20 for Yacoub El Mansour), calculated as a weighted average between xG (home 1.42, away 1.22) and seasonal goals-for/goals-against averages (home 1.23 GF/1.54 GA, away 0.92/1.58). Seasonally, matches over 1.5 goals occur in 92% of home games and 83% of away games (average 88%), which strongly favors Over 1.5. The 2.5 line has moderate support: Over 2.5 is 62% for homes and 50% for aways (average 56%), consistent with the expected 2.53 goals but weaker than the signal for 1.5. Over 3.5 is unlikely (Over 3.5: 23% home, 8% away; average 16%), so Under 3.5 appears safer. Additionally, a high BTTS rate (home 85%, away 67%) and higher shots and SOT for the home side (11.77 shots and 3.62 SOT vs 9.25 and 3.33) support a both-teams-to-score scenario and selecting Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1). The home side have higher xG: 1.42 versus 1.22, more shots per match (11.77 vs 9.25) and in 85% of their games both teams scored compared to 67% for the visitors, indicating greater offensive activity. Visitors were level at the break in 58% of matches, while the home team had at least one goal by half-time in 77% of fixtures, so the first half is most likely to be a drawn affair but with goals. In the second half the hosts average 1.46 goals versus 1.17 for the visitors, and 92% of their matches after the break feature at least one goal, which favors the home side to decide the outcome. Additionally, the hosts have 16 points at half-time versus 7 for the visitors and average 1.0 point per match at the break compared to 0.58 for the guests, confirming the home side’s greater potential to secure victory after half-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Olympic Safi | Yacoub El Mansour | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Olympic Safi is 25% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Olympic Safi · 0.8 pts / match - Yacoub El Mansour
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Yacoub El Mansour is 35% better for: goals scored per match.
0.8 goals / match - Olympic Safi · 1.08 goals / match - Yacoub El Mansour
Olympic Safi is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.4 goals / match - Olympic Safi · 1.56 goals / match - Yacoub El Mansour
Olympic Safi scores in 72% of matches (18 of 25 matches), while Yacoub El Mansour keeps a clean sheet in 8% (2 of 25 matches).
Yacoub El Mansour scores in 80% of matches (20 of 25 matches), while Olympic Safi keeps a clean sheet in 16% (4 of 25 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Olympic Safi
Over / Under - Yacoub El Mansour
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Olympic Safi is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.12 pts / match - Olympic Safi · 0.92 pts / match - Yacoub El Mansour
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Olympic Safi - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 12%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Yacoub El Mansour - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 16%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Olympic Safi
Yacoub El Mansour
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| Olympic Safi | Liga | Yacoub El Mansour | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.20 | 2.15 | ▲ 2.64 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 64% | 51% | ▲ 76% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 40% | 38% | ▲ 56% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 16% | 31% | ▼ 8% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 64% | 61% | ▲ 72% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 84% | 74% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Olympic Safi 1 - 0 - 0 Yacoub El Mansour. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Olympic Safi vs Yacoub El Mansour?
The Botola Pro match finished Olympic Safi 0:1 Yacoub El Mansour. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Olympic Safi vs Yacoub El Mansour?
Olympic Safi score 0.80 goals per game on average and Yacoub El Mansour 1.08. The Botola Pro average is 2.15 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Olympic Safi's matches and 76% of Yacoub El Mansour's.
What form are Olympic Safi and Yacoub El Mansour in?
Over the last 5 games Olympic Safi have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Yacoub El Mansour 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Olympic Safi vs Yacoub El Mansour?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


