Olympique Dcheïra vs Olympic Safi: match statistics
Olympique Dcheïra vs Olympic Safi: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Olympique Dcheïra played Olympic Safi in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 2 July 2026. Venue: Stade Ahmed Fana. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Olympique Dcheïra: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Olympic Safi: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Olympique Dcheïra scores 1.00 and concedes 1.32 goals per match. Olympic Safi scores 0.82 and concedes 1.39. League average: 2.17 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Olympique Dcheïra 50%, Olympic Safi 64%. Over 2.5: Olympique Dcheïra 43%, Olympic Safi 39%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.
xG, shots and style
Olympic Safi has higher xG: 1.24 vs 1.22. Olympique Dcheïra: 9.3 shots per match, Olympic Safi: 9.8.
Match halves
Olympique Dcheïra: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.46. Olympic Safi: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.46.
Goals by minute
Olympique Dcheïra: 0-15 (6 goals). Olympic Safi: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Botola Pro: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Olympique Dcheïra has a recent run of 3 wins and 2 draws in the last 5 matches (2.2 points per game) and scored 10 goals in those five fixtures (2.0 per game), whereas Olympic Safi in their last 5 have 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss (1.2 ppg) and only 4 goals (0.8 per game). This season the hosts score just 0.64 goals per home game and fail to score in 50% of home matches, but they produce more shots on target (3.43 per game vs 2.86 for the visitors) and have a higher home xG (1.24 vs 1.14), which indicates better quality of chances created. Defensively Olympic Safi are slightly better away — conceding 1.36 goals per away game versus 1.57 conceded by Dcheïra at home — and the visitors’ shot conversion is marginally higher (about 8% vs 7% for the hosts), giving them some opportunity to punish mistakes. Despite the hosts’ season-long weaknesses (only 14% home wins and a -13 goal differential at home), Dcheïra’s key advantage is form and a clear uptick in goals in recent outings (10 vs 4 in the last 5), which speaks in their favor. Therefore I favor a home win, although I also assign a significant probability to a draw given the defensive instability of both teams.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
BTTS 'Yes' is more likely: both teams have season BTTS rates of 64% and 64% respectively, versus the league average of 52%. Clean sheets are rare — the away side has only 7% clean sheets this season, the home side 21%, and both teams concede on average 1.36 and 1.43 goals per match, supporting goals from both sides. The home team generates 1.34 xG on average and 3.86 shots on target from 10.07 total shots, while the away defense concedes 1.48 xG; although the away team scored only 4 goals in the last 5 matches (0.8 per match) and had 40% BTTS in their last 5, their very low clean sheet rate of 7% increases the likelihood they score. Considering the 64%/64% season BTTS combination, xG advantage and weak clean sheet stats, I rate BTTS 'Yes' 70% vs 'No' 30%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model projects 1.41 goals for the home team and 1.17 for the away team, totaling 2.58 expected goals in the match. Both teams show high Over 1.5 rates: home 71% of matches Over 1.5, away 79%, and BTTS is 64% for each side, which increases the likelihood of at least two goals. The home side averages 10.07 shots and 3.86 on target with xG_for 1.34; the opponents average 9.43 shots and 2.86 on target with xG_for 1.14, which together provide a realistic source of scoring opportunities. Historical Over 2.5 records are mixed (50% for homes vs 29% for aways, league 38%), and since the expected 2.58 goals is only slightly above the 2.5 threshold, Over 2.5 has a moderate edge; Over 3.5 is unlikely (only 14% seasonally for both teams). Therefore the strongest signal in the data is Over 1.5, hence the recommendation to play Over at the 1.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
In the last 5 matches the home side led at the break in 4 of 5 games (80%) and averaged 1.4 first-half goals, while the visitors averaged 0.4 first-half goals in the same period, suggesting a home advantage at half-time. The hosts won 3 of the last 5 matches (60%) compared to only 1 win for the visitors (20%), and the home side’s average goals in the last 5 games is 2.0 versus 0.8 for the away team, so a lead at the break has a realistic chance to convert into a full-time victory. Additionally, the home xG is 1.34 versus 1.14 for the visitors, and the hosts produce more on-target shots (3.86 vs 2.86), which increases the likelihood of maintaining initiative. Season-to-date, the home team has led at the break in 36% of matches versus 14% for away teams, and in the last 5 matches the home first-half goals average 1.8 vs 0.6 for the visitors; therefore the strongest signal is 1/1 (Half-Time/Full-Time).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Olympique Dcheïra | Olympic Safi | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Olympique Dcheïra is 83% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - Olympique Dcheïra · 1.2 pts / match - Olympic Safi
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Olympique Dcheïra is 22% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Olympique Dcheïra · 0.82 goals / match - Olympic Safi
Olympique Dcheïra is 5% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.32 goals / match - Olympique Dcheïra · 1.39 goals / match - Olympic Safi
Olympique Dcheïra scores in 64% of matches (18 of 28 matches), while Olympic Safi keeps a clean sheet in 14% (4 of 28 matches).
Olympic Safi scores in 71% of matches (20 of 28 matches), while Olympique Dcheïra keeps a clean sheet in 21% (6 of 28 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Olympique Dcheïra
Over / Under - Olympic Safi
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Olympic Safi is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.07 pts / match - Olympique Dcheïra · 1.14 pts / match - Olympic Safi
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Olympique Dcheïra - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Olympic Safi - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 11%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Olympique Dcheïra
Olympic Safi
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| Olympique Dcheïra | Liga | Olympic Safi | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.32 | 2.17 | • 2.21 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 52% | ▲ 64% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 43% | 38% | • 39% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 21% | 30% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 63% | • 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 73% | ▲ 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Olympique Dcheïra 0 - 1 - 0 Olympic Safi. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Olympique Dcheïra vs Olympic Safi?
The Botola Pro match finished Olympique Dcheïra 1:1 Olympic Safi. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Olympique Dcheïra vs Olympic Safi?
Olympique Dcheïra score 1.00 goals per game on average and Olympic Safi 0.82. The Botola Pro average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Olympique Dcheïra's matches and 64% of Olympic Safi's.
What form are Olympique Dcheïra and Olympic Safi in?
Over the last 5 games Olympique Dcheïra have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Olympic Safi 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Olympique Dcheïra vs Olympic Safi?
The statistical background for Olympique Dcheïra vs Olympic Safi — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


