Japan - J2 LeagueNACK5 Stadium ŌmiyaData current as of 23 October 2026

Omiya Ardija vs Oita Trinita: match statistics

Omiya Ardija crest
Omiya Ardija
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Oita Trinita crest
Oita Trinita

Omiya Ardija vs Oita Trinita: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Omiya Ardija played Oita Trinita in J2 League (Japan). The match was played on 12 September 2026. Venue: NACK5 Stadium Ōmiya. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Omiya Ardija: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Oita Trinita: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Omiya Ardija scores 2.00 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Oita Trinita scores 1.00 and concedes 0.80. League average: 2.63 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Omiya Ardija 60%, Oita Trinita 40%. Over 2.5: Omiya Ardija 60%, Oita Trinita 20%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

Omiya Ardija has higher xG: 1.78 vs 1.21. Omiya Ardija: 15.4 shots per match, Oita Trinita: 10.2.

Match halves

Omiya Ardija: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 1.00. Oita Trinita: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.40.

Goals by minute

Omiya Ardija: 0-15 (3 goals). Oita Trinita: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

J2 League: 2.63 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Omiya Ardija top the table and remain unbeaten after 5 rounds, recording 3 wins and 2 draws, while Oita Trinita sit 15th with a record of 1 win, 2 draws and 2 defeats. At home, the hosts create significantly more chances, averaging 17 shots and 6 shots on target per match, with an xG of 1.98, compared with the visitors’ 8.5 shots, 2.5 shots on target and xG of 1.03 away from home. The strongest argument in favour of Omiya is Oita’s lack of attacking efficiency on the road, where they have yet to score in 100% of their matches, despite conceding an average of just 0.5 goals. Omiya average 1.5 goals scored at home and have failed to find the net in none of their home matches, while their xG against stands at just 1.06. The visitors have lost 3 of their last 5 matches and conceded 7 goals during that period, so the superior chance quality and home advantage point towards a win for the league leaders.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The stronger signal points toward BTTS - No, as Oita averages less than one goal per match in the season data, failed to score in 100% of its matches, and has a BTTS rate of 0%. Omiya averages 1.67 goals at home, but Oita has kept a clean sheet in 50% of its matches, so a home goal is not entirely certain either. The visitors’ last five matches provide a slightly better attacking picture, with an average of 1.0 goal and an xG of 1.45; however, Omiya allowed opponents just 1.06 xG during this period. The hosts have recorded BTTS in 67% of their matches this season and 60% of their last five, but Oita’s clearly poor finishing and the league BTTS average of just 44% increase the likelihood that at least one team will fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Omiya average 1.67 goals at home, but Oita concede just 0.50 goals per away match and have kept a clean sheet in 50% of such fixtures. The visitors have yet to score away from home, averaging only 2.5 shots on target, while Omiya allow opponents an average of 1.00 goal. In Oita’s matches, 100% of their away games so far have finished Under 2.5 and Under 3.5 goals, while 67% of Omiya’s matches have ended Under 3.5. More recent data is slightly more open, with xG from the last five matches standing at 1.77 for Omiya and 1.45 for Oita, but the combined projection of 2.10 goals still leaves a clear margin below four goals. Under 3.5 is therefore the strongest selection, as Oita’s solid defense and the visitors’ limited away attacking output significantly reduce the risk of a very high-scoring game.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by an Omiya victory at full-time, as Oita have drawn at the break in 100% of their matches so far and failed to score a single goal during those first halves. The hosts possess a clear offensive advantage: they average 1.67 goals compared with Oita’s 0.00 and also record 4.33 shots on target per match versus their opponents’ 2.50. In their last five matches, Omiya averaged 1.2 goals scored and only 0.4 conceded after the break, while Oita managed just 0.4 goals in this period and were behind at half-time in 60% of their appearances. The hosts’ advantage is further supported by an xG of 1.33 compared with 1.03, as well as the visitors’ weaker defence, which allows an average xG of 1.45. Omiya won 40% of their last five matches, whereas Oita lost 60%, so after a cautious first half, the hosts should more often turn the match in their favour.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

67Possession (%)33
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
22Shots6
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
5Shots on target1
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
2.25xG0.77
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
5Corners1
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
72Dangerous attacks44
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
15Fouls17
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
2Cards3
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
2Goals scored / match1
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
1Goals conceded / match0.8
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
54%Average possession52%
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
5.4Shots on target / match3.6
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.4Shots per match10.2
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
5.4Shots on target3.6
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
13%Shot conversion9.8%
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
54%Possession52%
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
1.78xG for1.21
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
1.26xG against1.3
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita

Shooting quality

Omiya Ardija: AttackingOita Trinita: Balanced
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
Accuracy (shots on target)35%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Omiya Ardija is 120% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - Omiya Ardija · 1 pts / match - Oita Trinita

Omiya Ardija
WWWDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
60% W40% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-0
Last 5 at home
1-1-0
WD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Oita Trinita
LDWLD
Season result split
20% W40% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-1
Last 5 away
0-1-1
DL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 1.30BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Omiya Ardija is 100% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - Omiya Ardija · 1 goals / match - Oita Trinita

Oita Trinita is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Omiya Ardija · 0.8 goals / match - Oita Trinita

Omiya Ardija scoring profile: very strong

Omiya Ardija scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Oita Trinita keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

Oita Trinita scoring profile: mixed

Oita Trinita scores in 40% of matches (2 of 5 matches), while Omiya Ardija keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 matches).

10Goals scored (season)5
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
5Goals conceded (season)4
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
3Average goals in match1.8
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
10Goals scored (last 5)5
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
5Goals conceded (last 5)4
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal40%
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
60%2 goals20%
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
40%3 goals20%
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
20%4 goals20%
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal80%
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
40%2 goals0%
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
0%3 goals0%
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
0%4 goals0%
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

43%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time20%
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
20%BTTS in both halves0%
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
40%Scored in both halves20%
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
60%BTTS - last 540%
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
60%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time60%
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Omiya Ardija is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - Omiya Ardija · 1 pts / match - Oita Trinita

Omiya Ardija - half-time state
60% leading20% draw20% trailing
Oita Trinita - half-time state
20% leading40% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)1
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
1Goals scored (1st half)0.6
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
0.6Goals conceded (1st half)0.6
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
1.6Average goals (1st half)1.2
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
60%Clean sheet before half-time40%
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
40%No goal before half-time80%
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita

After half-time (2nd half)

1.8Points per match (2nd half)1.6
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
0.4Goals conceded (2nd half)0.2
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
1.4Average goals (2nd half)0.6
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
60%Clean sheet after half-time80%
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita
40%No goal after half-time60%
Omiya ArdijaOita Trinita

Omiya Ardija - second-half results

40% W60% D0% L
10
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Oita Trinita - second-half results

40% W40% D20% L
5
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Omiya Ardija - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.80
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Oita Trinita - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.20.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Omiya Ardija
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Oita Trinita
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
2
16-30
2
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.40
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-17%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
32%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Omiya Ardija

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
128%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 30% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Oita Trinita

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
51%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J2 League).

Teams vs league

Omiya ArdijaLigaOita Trinita
Average goals in match▲ 3.002.63▼ 1.80
Both teams scored▲ 60%43%▼ 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 60%48%▼ 20%
Clean sheets▲ 40%34%▼ 20%
Goal before half-time▲ 80%69%▼ 60%
Goal after half-time▼ 60%78%▼ 60%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.63
Average goals per match
43%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.56
Home goals / match
1.07
Away goals / match
+46%
Home attack advantage
+31%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Omiya ArdijaSubstitutionOn: Sunao KideraOff: Hijiri Kato
  2. Omiya ArdijaYellow cardMauricio Caprini Pinto
  3. Oita TrinitaYellow cardYasufumi Nishimura
  4. Omiya ArdijaYellow cardYuta Toyokawa
  5. Oita TrinitaYellow cardItsuki Oda
  6. Omiya ArdijaSubstitutionOn: Kauã Diniz RochaOff: Yuta Toyokawa
  7. Omiya ArdijaSubstitutionOn: Kota NakayamaOff: Matthew Edward
  8. Oita TrinitaSubstitutionOn: Hiroshi KiyotakeOff: Shinya Utsumoto
  9. Oita TrinitaYellow cardHiroshi Kiyotake

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Omiya Ardija 0 - 2 - 0 Oita Trinita. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Oita Trinita
0 : 0
Omiya Ardija
Omiya Ardija
2 : 2
Oita Trinita

FAQ

What was the result of Omiya Ardija vs Oita Trinita?

The J2 League match finished Omiya Ardija 0:0 Oita Trinita. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Omiya Ardija and Oita Trinita?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Omiya Ardija won 0, Oita Trinita won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Omiya Ardija vs Oita Trinita?

Omiya Ardija score 2.00 goals per game on average and Oita Trinita 1.00. The J2 League average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Omiya Ardija's matches and 40% of Oita Trinita's.

What form are Omiya Ardija and Oita Trinita in?

Over the last 5 games Omiya Ardija have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Oita Trinita 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Omiya Ardija vs Oita Trinita?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Omiya Ardija vs Oita Trinita: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.