Omiya Ardija vs Tokushima Vortis: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Omiya Ardija played Tokushima Vortis in J2 League (Japan). The match was played on 23 November 2025. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Omiya Ardija: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Tokushima Vortis: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Omiya Ardija scores 1.58 and concedes 0.94 goals per match. Tokushima Vortis scores 1.17 and concedes 0.61. League average: 2.47 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Omiya Ardija 44%, Tokushima Vortis 28%. Over 2.5: Omiya Ardija 53%, Tokushima Vortis 17%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 45%.

xG, shots and style

Omiya Ardija has higher xG: 1.58 vs 1.35. Omiya Ardija: 13.1 shots per match, Tokushima Vortis: 11.9.

Match halves

Omiya Ardija: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 1.00. Tokushima Vortis: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.56.

Goals by minute

Omiya Ardija: 76-90+ (20 goals). Tokushima Vortis: 31-45+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

J2 League: 2.47 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 45%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
20Shots10
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
5Shots on target4
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
2.08xG1.09
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
8Corners4
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
67Dangerous attacks25
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
15Fouls23
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
3Cards4
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
1.58Goals scored / match1.17
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
0.94Goals conceded / match0.61
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
49%Average possession53%
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
4.44Shots on target / match3.69
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.11Shots per match11.89
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
4.44Shots on target3.69
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
12.1%Shot conversion9.8%
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
49%Possession53%
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
1.58xG for1.35
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
1.39xG against1.26
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis

Shooting quality

Omiya Ardija: BalancedTokushima Vortis: Balanced
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
Accuracy (shots on target)34%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Omiya Ardija is 30% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - Omiya Ardija · 2 pts / match - Tokushima Vortis

Omiya Ardija
WWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W25% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
18-9-9
1.75 pts / match · goal difference +23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-5-4
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WLLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.62Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Tokushima Vortis
WWLDW
Season result split
47% W28% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
17-10-9
1.69 pts / match · goal difference +20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
8-6-4
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LLWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Omiya Ardija is 35% better for: goals scored per match.

1.58 goals / match - Omiya Ardija · 1.17 goals / match - Tokushima Vortis

Tokushima Vortis is 54% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.94 goals / match - Omiya Ardija · 0.61 goals / match - Tokushima Vortis

Omiya Ardija scoring profile: strong

Omiya Ardija scores in 78% of matches (28 of 36 matches), while Tokushima Vortis keeps a clean sheet in 53% (19 of 36 matches).

Tokushima Vortis scoring profile: strong

Tokushima Vortis scores in 69% of matches (25 of 36 matches), while Omiya Ardija keeps a clean sheet in 42% (15 of 36 matches).

57Goals scored (season)42
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
34Goals conceded (season)22
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
2.53Average goals in match1.78
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
12Goals scored (last 5)9
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
3Goals conceded (last 5)2
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal69%
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
53%2 goals31%
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
17%3 goals11%
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
8%4 goals6%
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis

How often they concede at least...

58%1 goal47%
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
28%2 goals11%
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
8%3 goals3%
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
0%4 goals0%
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

28%
Tokushima Vortis - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 36 matches
51%
League average

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time8%
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
14%BTTS in both halves3%
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
33%Scored in both halves17%
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis

BTTS and goal count

42%Min. 3 goals and BTTS14%
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
40%BTTS - last 520%
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

56%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
28%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time19%
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Omiya Ardija - half-time state
31% leading56% draw14% trailing
Tokushima Vortis - half-time state
31% leading58% draw11% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.47Points per match (1st half)1.5
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
0.58Goals scored (1st half)0.61
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
0.36Goals conceded (1st half)0.25
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
0.94Average goals (1st half)0.86
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
69%Clean sheet before half-time81%
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
53%No goal before half-time61%
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis

After half-time (2nd half)

1.64Points per match (2nd half)1.5
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.56
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
0.58Goals conceded (2nd half)0.36
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
1.58Average goals (2nd half)0.92
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
53%Clean sheet after half-time67%
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis
36%No goal after half-time53%
Omiya ArdijaTokushima Vortis

Omiya Ardija - second-half results

42% W39% D19% L
53
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
59
Second-half points
+15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding161%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tokushima Vortis - second-half results

36% W42% D22% L
54
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+13
Goal difference (1st half)
54
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Omiya Ardija - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.20
Goals scored / match0.81.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+3+6
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Tokushima Vortis - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.60
Goals scored / match1.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.00.4
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+6+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Omiya Ardija
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
8
4
16-30
9
5
31-45
10
12
46-60
6
4
61-75
20
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (20 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +15 - wins late phases.

Tokushima Vortis
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
7
4
16-30
12
3
31-45
9
4
46-60
7
5
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.15
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
87%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
36%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-54%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Omiya Ardija

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.45
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-16.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
124%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.85
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

Tokushima Vortis

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-23.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.65
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
48%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J2 League).

Teams vs league

Omiya ArdijaLigaTokushima Vortis
Average goals in match 2.532.47 1.78
Both teams scored 44%51% 28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%45% 17%
Clean sheets 42%29% 53%
Goal before half-time 56%69% 50%
Goal after half-time 78%75% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.47
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.27
Home goals / match
1.19
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Tokushima VortisYellow cardNaoki Kanuma
  2. Omiya ArdijaGoalOriola SundayAssist: Masato Kojima
  3. Omiya ArdijaYellow cardArthur Silva Feitoza
  4. Tokushima VortisGoalDaiki WatariAssist: Yuya Takagi
  5. Omiya ArdijaYellow cardYosuke Murakami
  6. Tokushima VortisYellow cardLucas Barcellos Damasceno
  7. Tokushima VortisSubstitutionOn: Lawrence David IzuchukwuOff: Daiki Watari
  8. Tokushima VortisYellow cardElson Ferreira de Souza
  9. Tokushima VortisSubstitutionOn: Ko YanagisawaOff: Elson Ferreira de Souza
  10. Tokushima VortisSubstitutionOn: Ken IwaoOff: Naoki Kanuma
  11. Tokushima VortisSubstitutionOn: Kohei YamakoshiOff: Shunto Kodama
  12. Omiya ArdijaYellow cardFabián Andrés González Lasso
  13. Tokushima VortisYellow cardThonny Anderson da Silva Carvalho

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Omiya Ardija 0 - 0 - 1 Tokushima Vortis. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Tokushima Vortis
1 : 0
Omiya Ardija

FAQ

What was the result of Omiya Ardija vs Tokushima Vortis?

The J2 League match finished Omiya Ardija 1:2 Tokushima Vortis. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Omiya Ardija vs Tokushima Vortis?

Omiya Ardija score 1.58 goals per game on average and Tokushima Vortis 1.17. The J2 League average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Omiya Ardija's matches and 28% of Tokushima Vortis's.

What form are Omiya Ardija and Tokushima Vortis in?

Over the last 5 games Omiya Ardija have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Tokushima Vortis 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Omiya Ardija vs Tokushima Vortis?

The statistical background for Omiya Ardija vs Tokushima Vortis — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.