Japan - J2 LeagueNACK5 Stadium ŌmiyaData current as of 21 October 2026

Omiya Ardija vs Yokohama: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Omiya Ardija vs Yokohama: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Omiya Ardija play Yokohama in J2 League (Japan). The match date is 24 October 2026. Venue: NACK5 Stadium Ōmiya.

Current form

Omiya Ardija: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Yokohama: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Omiya Ardija scores 1.91 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Yokohama scores 1.82 and concedes 1.27. League average: 2.61 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Omiya Ardija 73%, Yokohama 55%. Over 2.5: Omiya Ardija 55%, Yokohama 55%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

Omiya Ardija has higher xG: 1.82 vs 1.69. Omiya Ardija: 15.8 shots per match, Yokohama: 14.6.

Match halves

Omiya Ardija: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 1.18. Yokohama: half-time lead 55%, second-half goals 0.91.

Goals by minute

Omiya Ardija: 76-90+ (8 goals). Yokohama: 16-30 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

J2 League: 2.61 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Omiya ArdijaYokohama
1.91Goals scored / match1.82
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
1Goals conceded / match1.27
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
60%Average possession54%
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
5.55Shots on target / match4.82
Omiya ArdijaYokohama

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.82Shots per match14.55
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
5.55Shots on target4.82
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
12.1%Shot conversion12.5%
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
60%Possession54%
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
1.82xG for1.69
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
1.24xG against1.7
Omiya ArdijaYokohama

Shooting quality

Omiya Ardija: DominantYokohama: Attacking
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
Accuracy (shots on target)35%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Omiya Ardija
DWDWL
Season result split
45% W45% D9% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-5-1
1.82 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-0
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WDDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.77Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 60%
Yokohama
WDWLD
Season result split
45% W27% D27% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-3
1.64 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-2
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LLDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.63Opponent xG: 1.89BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Omiya Ardija is 5% better for: goals scored per match.

1.91 goals / match - Omiya Ardija · 1.82 goals / match - Yokohama

Omiya Ardija is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Omiya Ardija · 1.27 goals / match - Yokohama

Omiya Ardija scoring profile: very strong

Omiya Ardija scores in 82% of matches (9 of 11 matches), while Yokohama keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 matches).

Yokohama scoring profile: very strong

Yokohama scores in 82% of matches (9 of 11 matches), while Omiya Ardija keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 matches).

21Goals scored (season)20
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
11Goals conceded (season)14
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
2.91Average goals in match3.09
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
11Goals scored (last 5)9
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
6Goals conceded (last 5)7
Omiya ArdijaYokohama

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal82%
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
45%2 goals55%
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
36%3 goals27%
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
18%4 goals9%
Omiya ArdijaYokohama

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal73%
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
27%2 goals45%
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
0%3 goals9%
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
0%4 goals0%
Omiya ArdijaYokohama

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

54%
League average

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time18%
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
9%BTTS in both halves9%
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
36%Scored in both halves36%
Omiya ArdijaYokohama

BTTS and goal count

55%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
100%BTTS - last 580%
Omiya ArdijaYokohama

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

82%Min. 1 goal before half-time73%
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
Omiya ArdijaYokohama

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time91%
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
55%Min. 2 goals after half-time73%
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
Omiya ArdijaYokohama

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Yokohama is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.55 pts / match - Omiya Ardija · 2 pts / match - Yokohama

Omiya Ardija - half-time state
45% leading18% draw36% trailing
Yokohama - half-time state
55% leading36% draw9% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.55Points per match (1st half)2
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
0.73Goals scored (1st half)0.91
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
0.55Goals conceded (1st half)0.27
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
1.27Average goals (1st half)1.18
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
55%Clean sheet before half-time73%
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
55%No goal before half-time36%
Omiya ArdijaYokohama

After half-time (2nd half)

2.09Points per match (2nd half)1.18
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
1.18Goals scored (2nd half)0.91
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
0.45Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
1.64Average goals (2nd half)1.91
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
55%Clean sheet after half-time27%
Omiya ArdijaYokohama
27%No goal after half-time45%
Omiya ArdijaYokohama

Omiya Ardija - second-half results

55% W45% D0% L
17
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.55
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Yokohama - second-half results

27% W36% D36% L
22
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding82%

Leads at half-time in 55% of matches and wins 45%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Omiya Ardija - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.60
Goals scored / match0.61.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.22.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference0+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Yokohama - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.400.60
Goals scored / match1.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match1.81.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+5-3
Half-time: 80% leading - 0% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Omiya Ardija
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
2
2
16-30
3
3
31-45
3
0
46-60
2
3
61-75
8
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

Yokohama
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
4
1
16-30
4
1
31-45
3
3
46-60
3
1
61-75
4
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
115%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Omiya Ardija

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.58
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
128%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

Yokohama

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.56
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
163%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J2 League).

Teams vs league

Omiya ArdijaLigaYokohama
Average goals in match▲ 2.912.61▲ 3.09
Both teams scored▲ 73%54%• 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 55%48%▲ 55%
Clean sheets• 27%27%• 27%
Goal before half-time▲ 82%68%▲ 73%
Goal after half-time▼ 73%78%▲ 91%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.61
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.49
Home goals / match
1.12
Away goals / match
+33%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

FAQ

When do Omiya Ardija and Yokohama play?

Omiya Ardija face Yokohama on 24 October 2026 in J2 League at NACK5 Stadium Ōmiya. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What do the goal statistics show before Omiya Ardija vs Yokohama?

Omiya Ardija score 1.91 goals per game on average and Yokohama 1.82. The J2 League average is 2.61 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 73% of Omiya Ardija's matches and 55% of Yokohama's.

What form are Omiya Ardija and Yokohama in?

Over the last 5 games Omiya Ardija have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Yokohama 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Omiya Ardija vs Yokohama?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.