Omonia 29is Maiou vs Doxa: match statistics
Omonia 29is Maiou vs Doxa: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Omonia 29is Maiou played Doxa in Second Division (Cyprus). The match was played on 19 April 2026. Final score: 5:1.
Current form
Omonia 29is Maiou: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Doxa: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Omonia 29is Maiou scores 1.93 and concedes 1.07 goals per match. Doxa scores 1.22 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.68 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Omonia 29is Maiou 56%, Doxa 44%. Over 2.5: Omonia 29is Maiou 56%, Doxa 37%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 49%.
xG, shots and style
Omonia 29is Maiou has higher xG: 1.66 vs 1.44. Omonia 29is Maiou: 8.6 shots per match, Doxa: 6.4.
Match halves
Omonia 29is Maiou: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 1.00. Doxa: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.78.
Goals by minute
Omonia 29is Maiou: 31-45+ (14 goals). Doxa: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second Division: 2.68 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 49%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Omonia 29is Maiou has a clear attacking edge — 52 goals scored this season versus Doxa's 33, and in the last 5 matches the home side netted 10 goals while the visitors managed only 6. Chance quality is similar (average xG 1.61 for Omonia vs 1.57 for Doxa), but Omonia generates more shots (12.57 vs 11.5) and posts a higher conversion rate (20% vs 17%), which increases their realistic chances. Defensively Doxa looks better in the short term — they conceded 4 goals in the last 5 matches compared to 7 for the hosts, and on average away Doxa concedes 1.08 goals per game versus Omonia’s 1.31 conceded at home. Additionally, the visitors are less likely to be shut out (FTS 8% vs 15%), suggesting both teams have a solid likelihood of scoring. Considering Omonia’s seasonal goal superiority (52 vs 33) and superior chance conversion, I give a narrow win to the hosts.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
xG and chance-creation analysis favors BTTS - xG for home is 1.36, xG for away is 1.57, and xG against is 1.40 (home) and 1.44 (away), yielding estimated expected goals ≈1.40 for Omonia and ≈1.49 for Doxy; a simple Poisson model gives P(BTTS) ≈58%. Seasonal rates are mixed: Omonia has a season BTTS of 29% versus Doxa 62%, with the league average at 48%, which weakens a decisive lean toward one scenario. In the last 5 matches Omonia has BTTS 60% and Doxa 40%; Omonia scores on average 2.0 and concedes 1.4, while Doxa scores 1.2 and concedes 0.8, indicating greater recent scoring activity from the home side. Doxa averages 5.17 on-target shots versus Omonia's 3.45 and has a conversion rate of 17% compared to the home side's 5%, so the visitors represent a real offensive threat; combined with xG ~1.4–1.5 this provides a strong signal for BTTS = "Yes".
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and defensive analysis yields concrete figures: xG_for_home = 1.36 and xG_for_away = 1.57, xG_against_home = 1.40 and xG_against_away = 1.44; taking averages (1.36+1.44)/2 = 1.40 for the home side and (1.57+1.40)/2 = 1.49 for the away side gives a total of 2.89 expected goals. Season stats confirm pressure from the visitors: Doxa matches finished Over 1.5 goals in 100% and Over 2.5 in 62% of cases, while Omonia’s figures are 57% and 14% respectively. Doxa averages 5.17 shots on target with a 17% conversion versus 3.45 shots and 5% conversion for the home side; the hosts have kept a clean sheet in only 36% of games, increasing the likelihood of the visitors scoring. A Poisson model with lambda = 2.89 yields approximately a 78% probability of Over 1.5 goals, about 55% for Over 2.5 and around 33% for Over 3.5, so the strongest signal points to Over 1.5. Accordingly I select Over 1.5 as the best line (forecast Over 1.5 = 78%), with expected 1.40 goals for Omonia and 1.49 for Doxa (total 2.89).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Data favor the visitors: Doxa has a 62% win rate this season versus Omonia’s 29% and scores an average of 1.85 goals per match compared to the home side’s 0.64. The visitors lead at the break in 31% of matches, hosts only in 14%, and first-half goals average 0.54 (Doxa) versus 0.36 (Omonia). Doxa generates xG of 1.57 versus Omonia’s 1.36, records more shots on target (5.17 vs 3.45) and a substantially higher conversion rate (17% vs 5%), which increases the likelihood that offensive superiority will translate into goals. In the second half the visitors score on average 1.31 goals and win the second half in 77% of matches, while Omonia averages 0.29 goals and wins second halves in 21%; this is a strong signal in favor of Doxa leading at the break and maintaining that advantage through full-time. Therefore the most probable scenario supported by the data is the visitors leading at half-time and winning the match (2/2).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Omonia 29is Maiou | Doxa | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.19 | 0.23 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.56 | 0.56 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Omonia 29is Maiou is 13% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Omonia 29is Maiou · 1.6 pts / match - Doxa
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Omonia 29is Maiou is 58% better for: goals scored per match.
1.93 goals / match - Omonia 29is Maiou · 1.22 goals / match - Doxa
Doxa is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.07 goals / match - Omonia 29is Maiou · 1 goals / match - Doxa
Omonia 29is Maiou scores in 89% of matches (24 of 27 matches), while Doxa keeps a clean sheet in 33% (9 of 27 matches).
Doxa scores in 70% of matches (19 of 27 matches), while Omonia 29is Maiou keeps a clean sheet in 41% (11 of 27 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Omonia 29is Maiou
Over / Under - Doxa
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Omonia 29is Maiou is 43% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.59 pts / match - Omonia 29is Maiou · 1.11 pts / match - Doxa
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Omonia 29is Maiou - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Doxa - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Omonia 29is Maiou
Doxa
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Omonia 29is Maiou | Liga | Doxa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.00 | 2.68 | ▼ 2.22 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 56% | 48% | ▼ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 56% | 49% | ▼ 37% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 41% | 30% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | • 74% | 73% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 85% | 77% | • 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Omonia 29is MaiouGoalStergios Avraam
- Omonia 29is MaiouGoalMárcio André Meira Fernandes
- Omonia 29is MaiouGoalSteve Brahim Joshep Omar Ambri
- Omonia 29is MaiouGoalMichael da Silva Campolargo Morais
- Omonia 29is MaiouGoalSteve Brahim Joshep Omar Ambri
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Omonia 29is Maiou 1 - 1 - 0 Doxa. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Omonia 29is Maiou vs Doxa?
The Second Division match finished Omonia 29is Maiou 5:1 Doxa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Omonia 29is Maiou and Doxa?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Omonia 29is Maiou won 1, Doxa won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Omonia 29is Maiou vs Doxa?
Omonia 29is Maiou score 1.93 goals per game on average and Doxa 1.22. The Second Division average is 2.68 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Omonia 29is Maiou's matches and 44% of Doxa's.
What form are Omonia 29is Maiou and Doxa in?
Over the last 5 games Omonia 29is Maiou have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Doxa 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Omonia 29is Maiou vs Doxa?
The statistical background for Omonia 29is Maiou vs Doxa — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.