Omonia 29is Maiou vs MEAP Nisou: match statistics
MEAP Nisou demonstrates significantly better away and overall form compared to Omonia 29is Maiou at home. The visitors remain unbeaten on the road this season (50% wins, 50% draws) and boast an impressive +5 goal difference in away fixtures, whereas the hosts carry a negative -3 balance at home. MEAP Nisou generates an average of 1.96 xG away while conceding just 1.26 xG, highlighting their offensive superiority and solid defense. Omonia wins only 17% of home games and fails to score in 33%, which, combined with the visitors' scoring consistency (83% of matches with a goal), gives MEAP Nisou a distinct advantage. Furthermore, the visitors have averaged 2 points per game over their last five outings compared to just 1.6 for the hosts, confirming their superior current disposition.
Omonia 29is Maiou vs MEAP Nisou: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Omonia 29is Maiou played MEAP Nisou in Second Division (Cyprus). The match was played on 10 January 2026. Final score: 7:0.
Current form
Omonia 29is Maiou: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. MEAP Nisou: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Omonia 29is Maiou scores 1.64 and concedes 1.07 goals per match. MEAP Nisou scores 1.29 and concedes 1.43. League average: 2.49 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Omonia 29is Maiou 50%, MEAP Nisou 57%. Over 2.5: Omonia 29is Maiou 50%, MEAP Nisou 50%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 45%.
xG, shots and style
MEAP Nisou has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.63. Omonia 29is Maiou: 9.9 shots per match, MEAP Nisou: 9.4.
Match halves
Omonia 29is Maiou: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.93. MEAP Nisou: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.50.
Goals by minute
Omonia 29is Maiou: 61-75 (5 goals). MEAP Nisou: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second Division: 2.49 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 45%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
MEAP Nisou demonstrates significantly better away and overall form compared to Omonia 29is Maiou at home. The visitors remain unbeaten on the road this season (50% wins, 50% draws) and boast an impressive +5 goal difference in away fixtures, whereas the hosts carry a negative -3 balance at home. MEAP Nisou generates an average of 1.96 xG away while conceding just 1.26 xG, highlighting their offensive superiority and solid defense. Omonia wins only 17% of home games and fails to score in 33%, which, combined with the visitors' scoring consistency (83% of matches with a goal), gives MEAP Nisou a distinct advantage. Furthermore, the visitors have averaged 2 points per game over their last five outings compared to just 1.6 for the hosts, confirming their superior current disposition.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Omonia 29is Maiou | MEAP Nisou | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.18 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.47 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
MEAP Nisou is 25% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Omonia 29is Maiou · 2 pts / match - MEAP Nisou
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Omonia 29is Maiou is 27% better for: goals scored per match.
1.64 goals / match - Omonia 29is Maiou · 1.29 goals / match - MEAP Nisou
Omonia 29is Maiou is 34% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.07 goals / match - Omonia 29is Maiou · 1.43 goals / match - MEAP Nisou
Omonia 29is Maiou scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while MEAP Nisou keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 matches).
MEAP Nisou scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Omonia 29is Maiou keeps a clean sheet in 43% (6 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Omonia 29is Maiou
Over / Under - MEAP Nisou
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Omonia 29is Maiou is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.36 pts / match - Omonia 29is Maiou · 1.29 pts / match - MEAP Nisou
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Omonia 29is Maiou - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
MEAP Nisou - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Omonia 29is Maiou
MEAP Nisou
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Omonia 29is Maiou | Liga | MEAP Nisou | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.71 | 2.49 | ▲ 2.71 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 46% | ▲ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 45% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 43% | 32% | ▼ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 67% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 76% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Omonia 29is MaiouGoalAngelis Angeli
- Omonia 29is MaiouGoalSteve Brahim Joshep Omar Ambri
- Omonia 29is MaiouGoalSteve Brahim Joshep Omar Ambri
- Omonia 29is MaiouGoalMichael da Silva Campolargo Morais
- Omonia 29is MaiouGoalMárcio André Meira Fernandes
- Omonia 29is MaiouGoalReda Kharchouch
FAQ
What was the result of Omonia 29is Maiou vs MEAP Nisou?
The Second Division match finished Omonia 29is Maiou 7:0 MEAP Nisou. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Omonia 29is Maiou vs MEAP Nisou?
Omonia 29is Maiou score 1.64 goals per game on average and MEAP Nisou 1.29. The Second Division average is 2.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Omonia 29is Maiou's matches and 57% of MEAP Nisou's.
What form are Omonia 29is Maiou and MEAP Nisou in?
Over the last 5 games Omonia 29is Maiou have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and MEAP Nisou 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Omonia 29is Maiou vs MEAP Nisou?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.