Omonia Aradippou vs Akritas: match statistics
Omonia Aradippou vs Akritas: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Omonia Aradippou played Akritas in First Division (Cyprus). The match was played on 9 May 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Omonia Aradippou: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Akritas: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Omonia Aradippou scores 0.87 and concedes 1.29 goals per match. Akritas scores 0.94 and concedes 1.74. League average: 2.59 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Omonia Aradippou 39%, Akritas 35%. Over 2.5: Omonia Aradippou 35%, Akritas 52%. League level: BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots and style
Omonia Aradippou has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.06. Omonia Aradippou: 11.8 shots per match, Akritas: 8.2.
Match halves
Omonia Aradippou: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.55. Akritas: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.55.
Goals by minute
Omonia Aradippou: 76-90+ (8 goals). Akritas: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division: 2.59 goals per match, BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Akritas has a clear advantage in recent form: the visitors won 3 of their last 5 matches, scored 6 goals and averaged 1.8 points per game in that period, while Omonia has not won any of their last 5, scored only 4 goals and averaged 0.4 points per game. However, Omonia creates more chances at home — on average 12.38 shots and 4.56 on target per game with an average xG of 1.56, compared to 7.44 shots, 3 on target and xG 1.02 for Akritas away. The key difference is finishing efficiency: Akritas converts 15% of shots into goals, while Omonia has 8% in home matches, and the visitors fail to score less often (the away side were shut out in 38% of away games vs 44% of Omonia’s home fixtures). Defensively both teams are vulnerable — hosts concede 1.5 goals per home game on average, visitors concede 1.75 away and Akritas have conceded 54 goals this season, suggesting an open match with goals. Considering the visitors’ advantage in recent results and better finishing efficiency despite fewer chances, I favour an Akritas victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I favor the BTTS scenario (BTTS - Yes) as more likely because both teams display weak defenses: Omonia concedes 1.73 goals per match and Akritas 1.75, with clean sheets in only 20% and 31% of games respectively, and xG against of 1.58 and 1.62. Although season-long matches with both teams scoring are low (33% for Omonia and 38% for Akritas), Omonia's last 5 matches show BTTS at 80% versus Akritas' 40%, providing a strong short-term signal. Offensive metrics also support goals from both sides: Omonia's recent xG_for is 1.75 (creating many chances), while Akritas has a better shot conversion rate of 15% versus the home side's 8%, so the visitors are more efficient. Additionally, Akritas' matches finish over 2.5 goals in 69% of cases, which raises the likelihood of both teams scoring despite the season total average goals 0.73+1.13=1.86. Based on this I assign a 62% probability to BTTS 'yes' and 38% to 'no', selecting 'yes' as the strongest signal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I back Over 1.5: seasonally Omonia finished matches over 1.5 in 80% of cases and Akritas in 81%, with only 20% and 19% of matches under 1.5. My xG estimate, calculated as the average of the team’s attacking xG and opponent’s conceded xG, is 1.36 for the home side (1.09 attacking xG and 1.62 conceded xG by Akritas) and 1.30 for the away side (1.02 and 1.58), giving a combined expected goals total of 2.66. Combined xG 2.66 exceeds the 2.5 line, so Over 2.5 is moderately likely (56%), although Omonia’s seasonal rate of only 33% over 2.5 limits confidence in that market. Over 3.5 looks unlikely: seasonal rates of 33% and 38% for home and away plus a combined xG of 2.66 point to roughly a 29% chance of 4+ goals. Additionally, both teams have a high share of matches with at least one goal (100% and 94%) and low clean-sheet percentages (20% and 31%), which reinforces the signal for Over 1.5 as the best line to play.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal from the data indicates the away team leading at half-time and winning by full-time: hosts led at half in 40% of matches and were trailing in 47%, meaning the visitors are more often in front after 45 minutes. The away side has a higher win rate 38% versus 27% for the hosts and better form in the last 5 matches (away team won 60% of those games, hosts 0%), increasing the likelihood of maintaining the lead. Additionally, the visitors are more efficient in finishing chances (shot conversion 15% vs 8%) and average 1.69 goals after the break versus 1.27 for the hosts, which favors holding or extending the lead. xG is similar (1.09 for hosts vs 1.02 for visitors), so the visitors’ edge stems more from efficiency and form than from a clear advantage in chance creation. Therefore I select 2/2 as the best pick (32%): the combined share of scenarios in which the away team leads at the break (2/2 + 2/X + 2/1) is 47%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Omonia Aradippou | Akritas | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.21 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Akritas is 350% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / match - Omonia Aradippou · 1.8 pts / match - Akritas
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Akritas is 8% better for: goals scored per match.
0.87 goals / match - Omonia Aradippou · 0.94 goals / match - Akritas
Omonia Aradippou is 35% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.29 goals / match - Omonia Aradippou · 1.74 goals / match - Akritas
Omonia Aradippou scores in 58% of matches (18 of 31 matches), while Akritas keeps a clean sheet in 26% (8 of 31 matches).
Akritas scores in 58% of matches (18 of 31 matches), while Omonia Aradippou keeps a clean sheet in 26% (8 of 31 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Omonia Aradippou
Over / Under - Akritas
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Akritas is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.94 pts / match - Omonia Aradippou · 1.13 pts / match - Akritas
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Omonia Aradippou - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Akritas - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Omonia Aradippou
Akritas
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Omonia Aradippou | Liga | Akritas | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.16 | 2.59 | • 2.68 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 39% | 42% | ▼ 35% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 35% | 47% | ▲ 52% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 26% | 31% | ▼ 26% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 61% | 73% | ▲ 81% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 74% | 79% | ▼ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Omonia Aradippou 2 - 0 - 0 Akritas. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Omonia Aradippou vs Akritas?
The First Division match finished Omonia Aradippou 2:1 Akritas. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Omonia Aradippou and Akritas?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Omonia Aradippou won 2, Akritas won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Omonia Aradippou vs Akritas?
Omonia Aradippou score 0.87 goals per game on average and Akritas 0.94. The First Division average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 39% of Omonia Aradippou's matches and 35% of Akritas's.
What form are Omonia Aradippou and Akritas in?
Over the last 5 games Omonia Aradippou have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Akritas 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Omonia Aradippou vs Akritas?
The statistical background for Omonia Aradippou vs Akritas — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.