Omonia Aradippou vs Digenis Ypsonas: match statistics
Statistical analysis points to highly balanced chances for both teams, suggesting a draw as the most probable outcome. Omonia Aradippou (11th place) suffers from dismal home form, recording a 71% loss rate and just 29% wins at home, while conceding an average of 1.86 goals per match. In contrast, Digenis Ypsonas (13th place) displays superior defensive solidity on the road, conceding only 0.86 goals on average and maintaining clean sheets in 43% of matches—an impressive figure. Both teams possess identical offensive efficiency in these conditions (0.71 goals per match) alongside a high FTS% (57%), indicating significant struggles in finding the net. Considering the hosts' weak form in the last 5 matches (1.4 PPG) and the visitors' even poorer run (0.8 PPG), combined with Digenis's solid away defense, a low-scoring draw or a narrow victory for either side appears the most plausible scenario.
Omonia Aradippou vs Digenis Ypsonas: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Omonia Aradippou played Digenis Ypsonas in First Division (Cyprus). The match was played on 2 January 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Omonia Aradippou: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Digenis Ypsonas: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Omonia Aradippou scores 0.67 and concedes 1.47 goals per match. Digenis Ypsonas scores 0.73 and concedes 1.47. League average: 2.57 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Omonia Aradippou 27%, Digenis Ypsonas 27%. Over 2.5: Omonia Aradippou 33%, Digenis Ypsonas 47%. League level: BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 48%.
xG, shots and style
Omonia Aradippou has higher xG: 1.23 vs 1.08. Omonia Aradippou: 9.9 shots per match, Digenis Ypsonas: 7.7.
Match halves
Omonia Aradippou: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.33. Digenis Ypsonas: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.53.
Goals by minute
Omonia Aradippou: 16-30 (3 goals). Digenis Ypsonas: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division: 2.57 goals per match, BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 48%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Statistical analysis points to highly balanced chances for both teams, suggesting a draw as the most probable outcome. Omonia Aradippou (11th place) suffers from dismal home form, recording a 71% loss rate and just 29% wins at home, while conceding an average of 1.86 goals per match. In contrast, Digenis Ypsonas (13th place) displays superior defensive solidity on the road, conceding only 0.86 goals on average and maintaining clean sheets in 43% of matches—an impressive figure. Both teams possess identical offensive efficiency in these conditions (0.71 goals per match) alongside a high FTS% (57%), indicating significant struggles in finding the net. Considering the hosts' weak form in the last 5 matches (1.4 PPG) and the visitors' even poorer run (0.8 PPG), combined with Digenis's solid away defense, a low-scoring draw or a narrow victory for either side appears the most plausible scenario.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Omonia Aradippou | Digenis Ypsonas | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.21 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Omonia Aradippou is 75% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Omonia Aradippou · 0.8 pts / match - Digenis Ypsonas
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Digenis Ypsonas is 9% better for: goals scored per match.
0.67 goals / match - Omonia Aradippou · 0.73 goals / match - Digenis Ypsonas
Omonia Aradippou scores in 47% of matches (7 of 15 matches), while Digenis Ypsonas keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).
Digenis Ypsonas scores in 47% of matches (7 of 15 matches), while Omonia Aradippou keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Omonia Aradippou
Over / Under - Digenis Ypsonas
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Digenis Ypsonas is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.93 pts / match - Omonia Aradippou · 1 pts / match - Digenis Ypsonas
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Omonia Aradippou - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Digenis Ypsonas - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Omonia Aradippou
Digenis Ypsonas
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Omonia Aradippou | Liga | Digenis Ypsonas | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.13 | 2.57 | ▼ 2.20 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 27% | 39% | ▼ 27% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 48% | • 47% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 27% | 34% | ▼ 27% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 53% | 72% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | • 80% | 81% | ▲ 93% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Other recorded players
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Omonia Aradippou 0 - 0 - 1 Digenis Ypsonas. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Omonia Aradippou vs Digenis Ypsonas?
The First Division match finished Omonia Aradippou 1:0 Digenis Ypsonas. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Omonia Aradippou vs Digenis Ypsonas?
Omonia Aradippou score 0.67 goals per game on average and Digenis Ypsonas 0.73. The First Division average is 2.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 27% of Omonia Aradippou's matches and 27% of Digenis Ypsonas's.
What form are Omonia Aradippou and Digenis Ypsonas in?
Over the last 5 games Omonia Aradippou have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Digenis Ypsonas 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Omonia Aradippou vs Digenis Ypsonas?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.