United States - USL League OneData current as of 13 September 2026

One Knoxville vs Union Omaha: match statistics

One Knoxville crest
One Knoxville
1 : 2half-time 1:1
Union Omaha crest
Union Omaha

One Knoxville vs Union Omaha: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

One Knoxville played Union Omaha in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 13 May 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

One Knoxville: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Union Omaha: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

One Knoxville scores 1.50 and concedes 0.75 goals per match. Union Omaha scores 1.75 and concedes 1.13. League average: 2.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: One Knoxville 50%, Union Omaha 63%. Over 2.5: One Knoxville 63%, Union Omaha 63%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 58%.

xG, shots and style

Union Omaha has higher xG: 1.82 vs 1.67. One Knoxville: 14.3 shots per match, Union Omaha: 15.5.

Match halves

One Knoxville: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.75. Union Omaha: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 1.13.

Goals by minute

One Knoxville: 16-30 (3 goals). Union Omaha: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL League One: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 58%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

One Knoxville (1st) vs Union Omaha (3rd) — despite the visitors having more goals this season (14 vs 12), I forecast a home win. In terms of chance quality One Knoxville at home posts average xG 1.81 and 5.75 shots on target from 16 shots per match, while Union Omaha away records xG 1.50 and 3.67 shots on target from 13 shots. Defensively the hosts also fare better: they concede 0.75 goals per home match and have 50% clean sheets, whereas the visitors concede 1.33 goals away and have 0% clean sheets. In the last 5 matches One Knoxville scored 10 and conceded 9 (averaging 1.6 points per match), while Union Omaha scored 7 and conceded 6 (averaging 1.4 points per match), showing similar form but a home advantage in chance creation. Union Omaha have a higher finishing rate (10% vs 6%), so they can threaten, but superior xG, more shots on target and more solid home defense favour the hosts to win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams show high BTTS rates: One Knoxville season BTTS 60% and Union Omaha 67%, versus a league average of 56%, and in the last 5 matches One Knoxville records 80% BTTS compared to Union Omaha's 60%. Goal statistics support a Goal/Goal outcome — One Knoxville averages 2.0 scored and 1.0 conceded per game, Union Omaha 1.33 scored and 1.33 conceded, meaning both teams collectively produce 3.33 goals per match on average. xG also points to chances from both sides: One Knoxville generates xG 2.01 with xG against 0.90, while Union Omaha posts xG 1.50 with xG against 1.61, indicating sufficient offensive potential and defensive susceptibility. Additionally, the home side averages 6.0 shots on target from 17.0 attempts, the away team 3.67 on target from 13.0 attempts; Union Omaha has no clean sheets (0%) and recent 5-match tallies of 10 scored and 9 conceded (home) vs 7-6 (away) further reinforce a BTTS - Yes signal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Combining One Knoxville’s attacking xG (2.01) with Union Omaha’s xG conceded (1.61) yields an expected ≈1.81 goals for the home side; conversely, 1.50 xG for Union Omaha against 0.90 xG conceded by One Knoxville gives ≈1.20 goals for the away side and a total of ≈3.01. Match data confirm the offensive tendency: One Knoxville averages 2.0 goals per match, Union Omaha 1.33, and the hosts produce on average 17.0 shots and 6.0 on target versus the visitors’ 13.0/3.67. Seasonal over 2.5 rates are 60% for the hosts and 67% for the away team (avg ~63.5%), and in the last 5 matches One Knoxville had over 2.5 in 80% of cases, so I assess the probability of Over 2.5 at about 72%. The 1.5 line is even stronger – season over 1.5 are 80% and 67% (I assess Over 1.5 at ~88%) – while the 3.5 line has less support: 40% and 33%, hence Under 3.5 ~66%. Therefore I recommend a bet on Over 2.5 with a projection of 1.81 goals for One Knoxville and 1.20 for Union Omaha (total 3.01), because xG and historical over percentages indicate a clear edge for the Over side.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

At half-time draws dominate: the home team were level at the break in 60% of matches, while Union Omaha were level in 67%, giving an estimated ~63% probability of a draw at half-time. Nevertheless One Knoxville has a clear advantage at full-time — 80% wins this season and an average of 2.6 points per match versus 33% wins and 1.0 point for the visitors; the home xG is 2.01 versus 1.5 for the away side, and average shots on target are 6.0 versus 3.67, indicating greater chance creation and conversion. The second-half tempo is crucial: the hosts average 2.0 goals in the second half and in 80% of matches score more than 1.5 goals after the break, with as many as five goals occurring between the 76th and 90th minutes, so many half-time draws end in their favor. Considering the roughly 63% chance of a draw at half-time and One Knoxville’s strong second-half performance (2.0 goals after the break, xG 2.01), the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1); therefore I assign X/1 35%, X/X 22% as the second realistic outcome, and 1/1 only about 11% due to the low frequency of the home side leading at the break (20%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
18Shots8
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
6Shots on target4
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
1.96xG1
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
11Corners1
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
56Dangerous attacks29
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
9Fouls18
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
2Cards2
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
1.5Goals scored / match1.75
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
0.75Goals conceded / match1.13
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
51%Average possession60%
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
5.38Shots on target / match5.13
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.25Shots per match15.5
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
5.38Shots on target5.13
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
10.5%Shot conversion11.3%
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
51%Possession60%
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
1.67xG for1.82
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
1.39xG against1.16
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha

Shooting quality

One Knoxville: AttackingUnion Omaha: Dominant
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
Accuracy (shots on target)38%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

One Knoxville is 30% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - One Knoxville · 2 pts / match - Union Omaha

One Knoxville
WWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
63% W25% D13% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-1
2.13 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-1
Last 5 at home
2-1-1
LDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.72Opponent xG: 1.64BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Union Omaha
WWLWD
Season result split
63% W13% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-1-2
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-2
Last 5 away
1-0-2
LWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.86Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Union Omaha is 17% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - One Knoxville · 1.75 goals / match - Union Omaha

One Knoxville is 51% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.75 goals / match - One Knoxville · 1.13 goals / match - Union Omaha

One Knoxville scoring profile: very strong

One Knoxville scores in 75% of matches (6 of 8 matches), while Union Omaha keeps a clean sheet in 25% (2 of 8 matches).

Union Omaha scoring profile: strong

Union Omaha scores in 88% of matches (7 of 8 matches), while One Knoxville keeps a clean sheet in 50% (4 of 8 matches).

12Goals scored (season)14
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
6Goals conceded (season)9
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
2.25Average goals in match2.88
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
8Goals scored (last 5)9
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
2Goals conceded (last 5)5
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal88%
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
50%2 goals63%
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
25%3 goals25%
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
0%4 goals0%
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal75%
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
25%2 goals38%
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
0%3 goals0%
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
0%4 goals0%
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

38%BTTS at half-time25%
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
0%BTTS in both halves13%
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
25%Scored in both halves38%
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS63%
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
40%BTTS - last 560%
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha

2nd half

63%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time63%
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

One Knoxville - half-time state
25% leading63% draw13% trailing
Union Omaha - half-time state
25% leading63% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per match (1st half)1.38
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
0.75Goals scored (1st half)0.63
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
1.25Average goals (1st half)1.13
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
63%Clean sheet before half-time63%
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
50%No goal before half-time50%
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha

After half-time (2nd half)

1.88Points per match (2nd half)1.75
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
0.75Goals scored (2nd half)1.13
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
0.25Goals conceded (2nd half)0.63
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
1Average goals (2nd half)1.75
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
75%Clean sheet after half-time38%
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha
50%No goal after half-time25%
One KnoxvilleUnion Omaha

One Knoxville - second-half results

50% W38% D13% L
11
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding252%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Union Omaha - second-half results

50% W25% D25% L
11
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding252%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

One Knoxville - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.60
Goals scored / match0.41.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.61.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+1+5
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Union Omaha - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.00
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

One Knoxville
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
3
2
16-30
1
2
31-45
3
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Union Omaha
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
4
1
16-30
0
1
31-45
2
1
46-60
1
1
61-75
6
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.56
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-3%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

One Knoxville

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.64
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
68%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Union Omaha

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.66
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
158%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
67%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
43% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
43%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).

Teams vs league

One KnoxvilleLigaUnion Omaha
Average goals in match 2.252.79 2.88
Both teams scored 50%56% 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 63%58% 63%
Clean sheets 50%25% 25%
Goal before half-time 50%76% 63%
Goal after half-time 63%76% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.68
Home goals / match
1.11
Away goals / match
+51%
Home attack advantage
+34%
Home defence advantage
+30%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. One KnoxvilleGoalJohn Murphy
  2. Union OmahaGoalDiego Gutiérrez
  3. Union OmahaYellow cardDylan Borczak
  4. One KnoxvilleYellow cardFinn McRobb
  5. One KnoxvilleSubstitutionOn: Denis KrioutchenkovOff: Braudílio Pina Rodrigues
  6. Union OmahaYellow cardSamuel Owusu
  7. One KnoxvilleSubstitutionOn: William PerkinsOff: Jaheim Brown
  8. Union OmahaGoalSergio Ors Navarro
  9. Union OmahaSubstitutionOn: Josué Aarón Gómez GómezOff: Kempes Tekiela
  10. Union OmahaSubstitutionOn: Jamie OrsonOff: Ryen Jiba
  11. One KnoxvilleYellow cardWilliam Perkins

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): One Knoxville 1 - 1 - 0 Union Omaha. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Union Omaha
2 : 2
One Knoxville SC
One Knoxville SC
1 : 0
Union Omaha

FAQ

What was the result of One Knoxville vs Union Omaha?

The USL League One match finished One Knoxville 1:2 Union Omaha. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between One Knoxville and Union Omaha?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches One Knoxville won 1, Union Omaha won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before One Knoxville vs Union Omaha?

One Knoxville score 1.50 goals per game on average and Union Omaha 1.75. The USL League One average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 50% of One Knoxville's matches and 63% of Union Omaha's.

What form are One Knoxville and Union Omaha in?

Over the last 5 games One Knoxville have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Union Omaha 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for One Knoxville vs Union Omaha?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.