Opatija vs Rudeš: match statistics
Opatija vs Rudeš: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Opatija played Rudeš in Druga HNL (Croatia). The match was played on 10 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Opatija: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Rudeš: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Opatija scores 0.68 and concedes 1.24 goals per match. Rudeš scores 1.28 and concedes 0.88. League average: 2.21 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Opatija 36%, Rudeš 36%. Over 2.5: Opatija 36%, Rudeš 32%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 40%.
xG, shots and style
Rudeš has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.14. Opatija: 8.4 shots per match, Rudeš: 10.6.
Match halves
Opatija: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.24. Rudeš: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.48.
Goals by minute
Opatija: 0-15 (4 goals). Rudeš: 16-30 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Druga HNL: 2.21 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 40%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I forecast an away win for Rudeš — the side sit 1st in the table versus Opatija in 11th and hold a clear numerical advantage this season. In their last 5 matches Rudeš have a record of 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, scoring 7 goals and averaging 2.0 points per game, while Opatija in their last 5 have 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, only 3 goals and 0.8 points per game. Over the whole season Rudeš have scored 32 goals versus Opatija’s 17, and offensively the visitors average 3.83 shots on target and 8.75 shots per game with xG 1.27, compared to the hosts’ 2.67 on target and 7.75 shots and xG 1.13. Additionally Rudeš are more consistent in scoring — they failed to score in only 17% of away matches, while Opatija failed to score in 42% of their home games; the visitors also have 50% of away matches as clean sheets versus 17% for the hosts, and in the last 5 matches Rudeš conceded 3 goals compared to 5 conceded by Opatija. Considering superior form, quality of created chances (xG 1.27 vs 1.13) and greater defensive stability, I assess the chances as: Rudeš win 60%, draw 20%, Opatija win 20%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Opatija has a seasonal clean sheet rate of 69% and concedes only 0.46 goals per match on average, with a seasonal BTTS rate of just 23%, strongly favoring a No Goal scenario. Rudeš posts a seasonal BTTS of 50% and scores 1.08 goals per match on average (last 5: 1.4), but in the visitors’ last 5 matches BTTS occurred in only 20% of cases and they conceded an average of 0.6 goals. xG indicates Opatija generates 1.57 xG while allowing 1.11 xG, and Rudeš has 1.27 xG_for and 1.36 xG_against, suggesting expected chances favor the hosts rather than a confident scoring display by the visitors. Additionally, Opatija averages 4.46 shots on target and 12.23 shots per match versus Rudeš’s 3.83 and 8.75, and the league BTTS rate is 42% with 67% clean sheets in the league, so defensive matches are common. Considering Opatija’s 69% clean sheets, 0% BTTS in their last 5 matches and only 23% seasonal BTTS at home, I forecast No BTTS (No Goal) as more likely at 70% vs BTTS - Yes 30%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate expected goals at 1.46 for Opatija and 1.00 for Rudeš (total 2.46), based on xG: Opatija 1.57 and Rudeš 1.27, and Opatija’s actual defense which concedes only 0.46 goals per game. Season metrics confirm a moderate chance of a high-scoring game — Over 2.5 occurred in 31% of Opatija’s matches and 33% of Rudeš’s, while Opatija has 69% clean sheets and only 23% of matches with both teams scoring. In the last 5 matches Rudeš averaged 1.4 goals, Opatija 0.6, and last-5 xG are 1.45 and 1.12 respectively, indicating moderately offensive play but not a high goal count. A Poisson model with λ=2.46 yields over 1.5 ~70%, over 2.5 ~44% and over 3.5 ~23%, therefore the strongest signal is play Under 2.5 (56%), considering the low season frequency of Over 2.5 and Opatija’s high number of clean sheets.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Opatija has a clear seasonal advantage: the hosts win 77% of home matches and score on average 1.46 goals per game while conceding 0.46, and by half-time they average 0.77 goals scored and only 0.08 conceded. The hosts led at the break 6 times (46%) and kept a clean sheet in 69% of matches, which strongly supports maintaining a lead after 45 minutes. The offensive advantage is confirmed by an xG of 1.57 for Opatija versus 1.36 xG conceded by Rudeš, and a higher shot volume of 12.23 (4.46 on target) compared to Rudeš’s 8.75 (3.83). Opatija also performs well in second halves (average points in second halves 1.77 and 0.69 goals scored after the break), so a lead at half-time often translates into a Full-Time victory; I assign the highest probability to the 1/1 scenario (42%), with X/1 as the second-strongest option (35%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Opatija | Rudeš | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Rudeš is 150% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Opatija · 2 pts / match - Rudeš
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Rudeš is 88% better for: goals scored per match.
0.68 goals / match - Opatija · 1.28 goals / match - Rudeš
Rudeš is 41% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.24 goals / match - Opatija · 0.88 goals / match - Rudeš
Opatija scores in 48% of matches (12 of 25 matches), while Rudeš keeps a clean sheet in 60% (15 of 25 matches).
Rudeš scores in 84% of matches (21 of 25 matches), while Opatija keeps a clean sheet in 24% (6 of 25 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Opatija
Over / Under - Rudeš
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Rudeš is 67% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.08 pts / match - Opatija · 1.8 pts / match - Rudeš
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Opatija - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Rudeš - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -11 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Opatija
Rudeš
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Druga HNL).
Teams vs league
| Opatija | Liga | Rudeš | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.92 | 2.21 | • 2.16 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 36% | 41% | ▼ 36% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 36% | 40% | ▼ 32% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 24% | 34% | ▲ 60% |
| Goal before half-time | • 64% | 64% | ▼ 56% |
| Goal after half-time | • 76% | 75% | ▼ 68% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Opatija 0 - 0 - 2 Rudeš. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Opatija vs Rudeš?
The Druga HNL match finished Opatija 1:1 Rudeš. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Opatija and Rudeš?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Opatija won 0, Rudeš won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Opatija vs Rudeš?
Opatija score 0.68 goals per game on average and Rudeš 1.28. The Druga HNL average is 2.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Opatija's matches and 36% of Rudeš's.
What form are Opatija and Rudeš in?
Over the last 5 games Opatija have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Rudeš 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Opatija vs Rudeš?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Opatija vs Rudeš: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


