Operário PR vs Criciúma: match statistics
Operário PR vs Criciúma: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Operário PR played Criciúma in Serie B (Brazil). The match was played on 24 May 2026. Venue: Estádio Germano Krüger. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Operário PR: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Criciúma: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Operário PR scores 1.00 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. Criciúma scores 1.11 and concedes 0.89. League average: 2.27 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Operário PR 33%, Criciúma 56%. Over 2.5: Operário PR 56%, Criciúma 22%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 43%.
xG, shots and style
Operário PR has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.39. Operário PR: 13.1 shots per match, Criciúma: 13.4.
Match halves
Operário PR: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.33. Criciúma: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
Operário PR: 0-15 (2 goals). Criciúma: 0-15 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Serie B: 2.27 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 43%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Operário PR has a clear advantage in the quality of chances at home: on average 16.4 shots and 5.6 on target per match with average xG of 1.72, while Criciúma away averages 9.4 shots, 2.2 on target and xG 1.01. This translates into a higher home goals average of 1.2 per match versus 0.8 scored by visitors on the road, despite the visitors having higher single-shot efficiency (conversion 9% vs 7%). However, there is defensive risk for Operário: in the last 5 matches they conceded 11 goals (2.2 per match) and have only 0.8 points per match in that period, whereas Criciúma conceded 6 goals and earns 1.2 points per match. Operário’s home data also show higher possession (54%) and — per provided stats — 80% clean sheets at home, while visitors have 40% clean sheets away and win only 20% of matches. Considering the advantage in chance quality (xG 1.72 vs 1.01), greater shot volume and possession dominance, I tip the home win, with moderate risk due to their recent goals conceded.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal statistics indicate a moderate lean toward the 'both teams to score' scenario: Operário has a season BTTS of 75% and averages 1.5 goals per match, while Criciúma has 40% BTTS and 0.8 goals, yielding a combined average of 57.5%, which is above the league average of 49%. In the last 5 matches the signals are even stronger: BTTS at home 40% vs away 80% (average 60%), with Operário conceding 2.2 goals per match on average and Criciúma 1.2. xG supports the likelihood of goals from both sides — Operário generates 1.86 xG on the season (1.51 recently), and Criciúma has 1.01 xG on the season (1.28 recently), while both defenses have xG against in the range 1.36–1.65, indicating chances are being created. Additionally the hosts attempt significantly more shots (18.5 vs 9.4) and shots on target (4.5 vs 2.2) and have conceded 11 goals in 5 matches, so the probability that the visitors will convert at least one opportunity is high. Considering the seasonal 57.5% and recent 60% for BTTS and the hosts' defensive issues, I rate BTTS at 63% vs 37% and select BTTS - Yes as the clearest signal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG estimate yields expected goals of 1.60 for Operário and 1.18 for Criciúma, calculated as the average of attack xG and opponent’s conceded goals average ((1.86+1.33)/2=1.595→1.60; (1.01+1.36)/2=1.185→1.18), totaling 2.78. This 2.78 is clearly above the league average of 2.23, and Operário generates 18.5 shots and 4.5 on target per match versus Criciúma’s 9.4 and 2.2, so the chance-creation edge lies with the home side. A Poisson model based on this gives roughly a 77% probability of Over 1.5 goals (≥2), about 53% for Over 2.5 goals (≥3) and around 30% for Over 3.5 goals (≥4). Season figures also support the over at the shorter lines: Operário has 75% of matches Over 1.5, Criciúma 40%, and in the last 5 matches Operário recorded 80% of games Over 2.5, reinforcing the over signal. Therefore I recommend an Over 1.5 bet as the strongest signal (approx. 77% vs 23% for under), while the 2.5 line remains more balanced (approx. 53% over).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Operário is clearly stronger this season: they score 1.5 goals per game on average versus Criciúma’s 0.8, have an xG of 1.86 compared to 1.01 and average 18.5 shots per game versus the visitors’ 9.4. Matches are often level at the break — the home side were level at half-time in 50% of their games (leading at the break in only 25%), so I assess a high probability of a draw at half-time. Operário dominates after the break: they average 1.0 goals after the interval versus Criciúma’s 0.4, average 1.5 second-half goals compared to the visitors’ 0.8, and have a second-half win rate of 50% versus 20%. Additionally, the home team hold a lead taken at half-time through to full-time in 75% of cases (seasonFTSPercentageHT_home = 75%), which reinforces the scenario of a half-time draw and an Operário victory by full-time; therefore I recommend HT/FT X/1 as the strongest signal (30%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Operário PR | Criciúma | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 24% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.21 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Criciúma is 50% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Operário PR · 1.2 pts / match - Criciúma
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Criciúma is 11% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Operário PR · 1.11 goals / match - Criciúma
Criciúma is 49% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.33 goals / match - Operário PR · 0.89 goals / match - Criciúma
Operário PR scores in 56% of matches (5 of 9 matches), while Criciúma keeps a clean sheet in 33% (3 of 9 matches).
Criciúma scores in 78% of matches (7 of 9 matches), while Operário PR keeps a clean sheet in 56% (5 of 9 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Operário PR
Over / Under - Criciúma
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Operário PR is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.22 pts / match - Operário PR · 1.11 pts / match - Criciúma
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Operário PR - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Criciúma - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Operário PR
Criciúma
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie B).
Teams vs league
| Operário PR | Liga | Criciúma | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.33 | 2.27 | ▼ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 49% | ▲ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 56% | 43% | ▼ 22% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 56% | 32% | • 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 58% | ▼ 56% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 56% | 77% | • 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Operário PR 2 - 0 - 0 Criciúma. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Operário PR vs Criciúma?
The Serie B match finished Operário PR 1:1 Criciúma. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Operário PR and Criciúma?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Operário PR won 2, Criciúma won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Operário PR vs Criciúma?
Operário PR score 1.00 goals per game on average and Criciúma 1.11. The Serie B average is 2.27 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Operário PR's matches and 56% of Criciúma's.
What form are Operário PR and Criciúma in?
Over the last 5 games Operário PR have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Criciúma 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Operário PR vs Criciúma?
The statistical background for Operário PR vs Criciúma — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


