Orlando City vs Chicago Fire: match statistics
Orlando City vs Chicago Fire: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Orlando City played Chicago Fire in MLS (United States). The match was played on 19 August 2026. Venue: Inter&Co Stadium. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Orlando City: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Chicago Fire: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Orlando City scores 1.63 and concedes 2.53 goals per match. Chicago Fire scores 1.89 and concedes 1.33. League average: 3.20 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Orlando City 63%, Chicago Fire 67%. Over 2.5: Orlando City 68%, Chicago Fire 78%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 61%.
xG, shots and style
Chicago Fire has higher xG: 1.58 vs 1.40. Orlando City: 12.2 shots per match, Chicago Fire: 14.1.
Match halves
Orlando City: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.95. Chicago Fire: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Orlando City: 16-30 (9 goals). Chicago Fire: 16-30 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS: 3.20 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 61%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Chicago Fire come into the match in significantly better form, having won 4 of their last 5 games and scored 10 goals in the process, while Orlando City have recorded 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, scoring 8 goals. The visitors also look considerably stronger defensively over the course of the season: they have conceded 23 goals in 17 matches, compared with Orlando’s 47 in 18. The hosts’ advantage, however, is home-field advantage, where they win 50% of their matches and score an average of 1.88 goals, compared with Chicago’s 1.75 goals away from home. Orlando do allow opponents chances worth an average xG of 1.94, clearly above the 1.59 recorded by Chicago away from home, which increases the in-form visitors’ chances of taking control of the match. Both teams concede an average of 1.63 goals at home and away respectively, so an open game should be expected, although current form gives Chicago a slight edge.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
BTTS - Yes is supported by the high efficiency of both attacks: Orlando City score an average of 2.00 goals at home, while Chicago Fire average 1.75 goals away. Chicago concede an average of 1.63 goals per match, while Orlando generate 1.85 xG at home and register 5.56 shots on target, making a home goal highly likely. The visitors also have strong arguments to score, as Orlando concede an average of 1.11 goals, while their average goals conceded has risen to 1.60 over their last five matches, with 1.64 xG against. Both teams recorded BTTS in 80% of their last five matches, while across the season Chicago’s rate stands at 75%, compared with 56% for Orlando and a league average of 61%. Additionally, Chicago have scored 10 goals in their last five appearances, while Orlando have conceded 8 during that period, further strengthening the scenario of a goal for each side.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams have very high season rates of matches featuring at least 2 goals: 78% for Orlando City and 88% for Chicago Fire. Orlando creates chances worth an average of 1.85 xG per match, while Chicago allows opponents 1.59 xG, supporting the forecast of at least one or two goals for the hosts. The visitors score an average of 1.75 goals, while Orlando concedes 1.11 goals per match, so their contribution to the total is also realistic. In their last 5 matches, both teams recorded Over 2.5 goals and Both Teams to Score in 80% of cases, with their combined average of goals scored standing at 3.6 per match. However, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals, as it combines a high level of agreement across the season data with an expected total of 2.98 goals and leaves a clear safety margin.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Orlando City has a clearly stronger home profile: they average 2.00 goals scored and 1.11 conceded at home, while Chicago Fire allow opponents an average of 1.63 goals per away match. Orlando’s advantage is also evident in the quality of chances created, with an average xG of 1.85 compared with Chicago’s 1.36, while their shots on target average 5.56 versus 4.63 for the visitors. The hosts led at the break in 3 of 9 matches, but the score was level after 45 minutes in 5 of 9, making a draw at half-time followed by an Orlando win a close alternative. After the break, Orlando score an average of 1.22 goals, while Chicago concede 0.75 away goals, further strengthening the hosts’ chances of settling the match in their favour. However, Chicago are on a strong run of four consecutive victories and have won 4 of their last 5 matches, meaning the 1/1 pick holds only a moderate, rather than dominant, edge over the X/1 variant.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Orlando City | Chicago Fire | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Chicago Fire is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Orlando City · 1.8 pts / match - Chicago Fire
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chicago Fire is 16% better for: goals scored per match.
1.63 goals / match - Orlando City · 1.89 goals / match - Chicago Fire
Chicago Fire is 90% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.53 goals / match - Orlando City · 1.33 goals / match - Chicago Fire
Orlando City scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while Chicago Fire keeps a clean sheet in 33% (6 of 18 matches).
Chicago Fire scores in 94% of matches (17 of 18 matches), while Orlando City keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 19 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Orlando City
Over / Under - Chicago Fire
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chicago Fire is 39% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.16 pts / match - Orlando City · 1.61 pts / match - Chicago Fire
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Orlando City - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Chicago Fire - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 0% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Orlando City
Chicago Fire
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).
Teams vs league
| Orlando City | Liga | Chicago Fire | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.16 | 3.20 | • 3.22 |
| Both teams scored | • 63% | 62% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 68% | 61% | ▲ 78% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 11% | 21% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 84% | 76% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 95% | 81% | ▼ 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Orlando City vs Chicago Fire?
The MLS match finished Orlando City 1:2 Chicago Fire. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Orlando City vs Chicago Fire?
Orlando City score 1.63 goals per game on average and Chicago Fire 1.89. The MLS average is 3.20 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Orlando City's matches and 67% of Chicago Fire's.
What form are Orlando City and Chicago Fire in?
Over the last 5 games Orlando City have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Chicago Fire 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Orlando City vs Chicago Fire?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


