United States - MLSInter&Co StadiumData current as of 30 August 2026

Orlando City vs Chicago Fire: match statistics

Orlando City crest
Orlando City
1 : 2half-time 0:1
Chicago Fire crest
Chicago Fire

Orlando City vs Chicago Fire: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Orlando City played Chicago Fire in MLS (United States). The match was played on 19 August 2026. Venue: Inter&Co Stadium. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Orlando City: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Chicago Fire: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Orlando City scores 1.63 and concedes 2.53 goals per match. Chicago Fire scores 1.89 and concedes 1.33. League average: 3.20 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Orlando City 63%, Chicago Fire 67%. Over 2.5: Orlando City 68%, Chicago Fire 78%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 61%.

xG, shots and style

Chicago Fire has higher xG: 1.58 vs 1.40. Orlando City: 12.2 shots per match, Chicago Fire: 14.1.

Match halves

Orlando City: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.95. Chicago Fire: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Orlando City: 16-30 (9 goals). Chicago Fire: 16-30 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.20 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 61%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Chicago Fire come into the match in significantly better form, having won 4 of their last 5 games and scored 10 goals in the process, while Orlando City have recorded 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, scoring 8 goals. The visitors also look considerably stronger defensively over the course of the season: they have conceded 23 goals in 17 matches, compared with Orlando’s 47 in 18. The hosts’ advantage, however, is home-field advantage, where they win 50% of their matches and score an average of 1.88 goals, compared with Chicago’s 1.75 goals away from home. Orlando do allow opponents chances worth an average xG of 1.94, clearly above the 1.59 recorded by Chicago away from home, which increases the in-form visitors’ chances of taking control of the match. Both teams concede an average of 1.63 goals at home and away respectively, so an open game should be expected, although current form gives Chicago a slight edge.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS - Yes is supported by the high efficiency of both attacks: Orlando City score an average of 2.00 goals at home, while Chicago Fire average 1.75 goals away. Chicago concede an average of 1.63 goals per match, while Orlando generate 1.85 xG at home and register 5.56 shots on target, making a home goal highly likely. The visitors also have strong arguments to score, as Orlando concede an average of 1.11 goals, while their average goals conceded has risen to 1.60 over their last five matches, with 1.64 xG against. Both teams recorded BTTS in 80% of their last five matches, while across the season Chicago’s rate stands at 75%, compared with 56% for Orlando and a league average of 61%. Additionally, Chicago have scored 10 goals in their last five appearances, while Orlando have conceded 8 during that period, further strengthening the scenario of a goal for each side.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams have very high season rates of matches featuring at least 2 goals: 78% for Orlando City and 88% for Chicago Fire. Orlando creates chances worth an average of 1.85 xG per match, while Chicago allows opponents 1.59 xG, supporting the forecast of at least one or two goals for the hosts. The visitors score an average of 1.75 goals, while Orlando concedes 1.11 goals per match, so their contribution to the total is also realistic. In their last 5 matches, both teams recorded Over 2.5 goals and Both Teams to Score in 80% of cases, with their combined average of goals scored standing at 3.6 per match. However, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals, as it combines a high level of agreement across the season data with an expected total of 2.98 goals and leaves a clear safety margin.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Orlando City has a clearly stronger home profile: they average 2.00 goals scored and 1.11 conceded at home, while Chicago Fire allow opponents an average of 1.63 goals per away match. Orlando’s advantage is also evident in the quality of chances created, with an average xG of 1.85 compared with Chicago’s 1.36, while their shots on target average 5.56 versus 4.63 for the visitors. The hosts led at the break in 3 of 9 matches, but the score was level after 45 minutes in 5 of 9, making a draw at half-time followed by an Orlando win a close alternative. After the break, Orlando score an average of 1.22 goals, while Chicago concede 0.75 away goals, further strengthening the hosts’ chances of settling the match in their favour. However, Chicago are on a strong run of four consecutive victories and have won 4 of their last 5 matches, meaning the 1/1 pick holds only a moderate, rather than dominant, edge over the X/1 variant.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
Orlando CityChicago Fire
16Shots7
Orlando CityChicago Fire
5Shots on target3
Orlando CityChicago Fire
1.75xG0.86
Orlando CityChicago Fire
3Corners3
Orlando CityChicago Fire
55Dangerous attacks28
Orlando CityChicago Fire
15Fouls11
Orlando CityChicago Fire
2Cards2
Orlando CityChicago Fire

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Orlando CityChicago Fire
1.63Goals scored / match1.89
Orlando CityChicago Fire
2.53Goals conceded / match1.33
Orlando CityChicago Fire
46%Average possession52%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
4.95Shots on target / match5.06
Orlando CityChicago Fire

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.21Shots per match14.11
Orlando CityChicago Fire
4.95Shots on target5.06
Orlando CityChicago Fire
13.4%Shot conversion13.4%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
46%Possession52%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
1.4xG for1.58
Orlando CityChicago Fire
1.97xG against1.38
Orlando CityChicago Fire

Shooting quality

Orlando City: Counter-attackingChicago Fire: Attacking
Orlando CityChicago Fire
Accuracy (shots on target)41%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chicago Fire is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Orlando City · 1.8 pts / match - Chicago Fire

Orlando City
LWWLD
Season result split
32% W16% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-10
1.11 pts / match · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-3
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WWDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.89Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Chicago Fire
WLLWW
Season result split
56% W11% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-2-6
1.78 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-3
Last 5 away
2-1-2
DWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chicago Fire is 16% better for: goals scored per match.

1.63 goals / match - Orlando City · 1.89 goals / match - Chicago Fire

Chicago Fire is 90% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.53 goals / match - Orlando City · 1.33 goals / match - Chicago Fire

Orlando City scoring profile: strong

Orlando City scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while Chicago Fire keeps a clean sheet in 33% (6 of 18 matches).

Chicago Fire scoring profile: very strong

Chicago Fire scores in 94% of matches (17 of 18 matches), while Orlando City keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 19 matches).

31Goals scored (season)34
Orlando CityChicago Fire
48Goals conceded (season)24
Orlando CityChicago Fire
4.16Average goals in match3.22
Orlando CityChicago Fire
10Goals scored (last 5)9
Orlando CityChicago Fire
10Goals conceded (last 5)9
Orlando CityChicago Fire

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal94%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
47%2 goals61%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
21%3 goals22%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
21%4 goals6%
Orlando CityChicago Fire

How often they concede at least...

89%1 goal67%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
58%2 goals39%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
47%3 goals28%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
26%4 goals0%
Orlando CityChicago Fire

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time39%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
5%BTTS in both halves11%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
26%Scored in both halves39%
Orlando CityChicago Fire

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
21%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
60%BTTS - last 5100%
Orlando CityChicago Fire

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

84%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
63%Min. 2 goals before half-time44%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
26%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Orlando CityChicago Fire

2nd half

95%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
58%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
42%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
Orlando CityChicago Fire

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chicago Fire is 39% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.16 pts / match - Orlando City · 1.61 pts / match - Chicago Fire

Orlando City - half-time state
32% leading21% draw47% trailing
Chicago Fire - half-time state
39% leading44% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.16Points per match (1st half)1.61
Orlando CityChicago Fire
0.68Goals scored (1st half)0.89
Orlando CityChicago Fire
1.21Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
Orlando CityChicago Fire
1.89Average goals (1st half)1.56
Orlando CityChicago Fire
42%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
53%No goal before half-time28%
Orlando CityChicago Fire

After half-time (2nd half)

1.21Points per match (2nd half)1.39
Orlando CityChicago Fire
0.95Goals scored (2nd half)1
Orlando CityChicago Fire
1.32Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
Orlando CityChicago Fire
2.26Average goals (2nd half)1.67
Orlando CityChicago Fire
37%Clean sheet after half-time61%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
47%No goal after half-time39%
Orlando CityChicago Fire

Orlando City - second-half results

37% W11% R53% P
22
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.16
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chicago Fire - second-half results

39% W22% R39% P
29
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.61
PPG before half-time
Lead holding144%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Orlando City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.40
Goals scored / match0.61.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match1.62.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Chicago Fire - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match1.20.6
Goals conceded / match1.20.6
Average goals in match2.41.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals100%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal0%40%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 80% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Orlando City
ScoredConceded
2
5
0-15
9
9
16-30
2
9
31-45
6
9
46-60
7
4
61-75
5
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Chicago Fire
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
8
4
16-30
3
7
31-45
3
2
46-60
8
1
61-75
7
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.69
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 2.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
115%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
70%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Orlando City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.57
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.56
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
189%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Chicago Fire

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
141%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Orlando CityLigaChicago Fire
Average goals in match 4.163.20 3.22
Both teams scored 63%62% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 68%61% 78%
Clean sheets 11%21% 33%
Goal before half-time 84%76% 83%
Goal after half-time 95%81% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.20
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.86
Home goals / match
1.34
Away goals / match
+39%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defence advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Chicago FireGoalPuso DithejaneAssist: David Poręba
  2. Orlando CityGoalDavid BrekaloAssist: Antoine Griezmann
  3. Orlando CityYellow cardLuis Otávio Costa de Aquino
  4. Orlando CitySubstitutionOn: Daryl DikeOff: Justin Ellis
  5. Orlando CityYellow cardRobin Jansson
  6. Chicago FireGoalRobert Lewandowski
  7. Orlando CitySubstitutionOn: Eduard Andrés Atuesta VelascoOff: Griffin Dorsey
  8. Chicago FireYellow cardViktor Radojević
  9. Chicago FireSubstitutionOn: Samual RogersOff: Robert Lewandowski
  10. Chicago FireYellow cardSamual Rogers

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Orlando City vs Chicago Fire?

The MLS match finished Orlando City 1:2 Chicago Fire. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Orlando City vs Chicago Fire?

Orlando City score 1.63 goals per game on average and Chicago Fire 1.89. The MLS average is 3.20 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Orlando City's matches and 67% of Chicago Fire's.

What form are Orlando City and Chicago Fire in?

Over the last 5 games Orlando City have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Chicago Fire 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Orlando City vs Chicago Fire?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.