Oulu vs Gnistan: match statistics
Oulu vs Gnistan: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Oulu played Gnistan in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 18 July 2026. Venue: Raatin stadion. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Oulu: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Gnistan: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Oulu scores 1.33 and concedes 1.20 goals per match. Gnistan scores 1.53 and concedes 1.33. League average: 2.70 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Oulu 47%, Gnistan 47%. Over 2.5: Oulu 47%, Gnistan 40%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 48%.
xG, shots and style
Gnistan has higher xG: 1.44 vs 1.31. Oulu: 11.2 shots per match, Gnistan: 12.5.
Match halves
Oulu: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.87. Gnistan: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.93.
Goals by minute
Oulu: 61-75 (6 goals). Gnistan: 46-60 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Veikkausliiga: 2.70 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 48%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-2. Average goals 5.33, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Oulu has a clear home advantage: in home matches they win 83% of the time, average 1.5 goals scored and only 0.5 conceded per game, keep a clean sheet in 50% of matches and have average xG at their side 1.43 versus opponents’ xG 1.14. Gnistan are less effective offensively on the road: they score 0.86 goals on average, fail to score in 43% of away games and have a lower shot conversion (8% versus Oulu’s 13%), with average xG 1.22 against xG conceded 1.6. However, in the last 5 matches overall Gnistan have scored 7 goals and average 1.6 points per game, while Oulu have only 4 goals and 1.0 point per game in that run, which gives the visitors some hope for a point. The key difference is the hosts’ control and efficiency: Oulu average 4.83 shots on target per home match versus Gnistan’s 3.57 on the road, which combined with better conversion suggests the hosts will more frequently turn created chances into goals. Based on these numbers I predict an Oulu win; estimated probabilities are 65% home, 20% draw and 15% away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I predict BTTS - Yes: both teams give a clear signal for goals at both ends — in the last 5 matches both Oulu and Gnistan recorded BTTS in 60% of games. Oulu averages 2.13 goals scored per match this season and has xG_for 1.63 with a season average conceded of 1.63; in the last 5 matches they conceded 10 goals (2.0 avg), increasing the risk of conceding. Gnistan, despite a seasonal average of 0.86, scored 7 goals in the last 5 matches (1.4 avg) and has xG_for 1.8 in that period versus Oulu last5 xG_against 1.55, so the visitors create chances and have realistic scoring prospects. Seasonal BTTS rates are 50% for Oulu and 43% for Gnistan, while the league BTTS level is 52%; combined with Oulu’s shooting advantage (14.5 shots and 5.25 shots on target vs 10.14 and 3.57) and the difference in conversion (15% vs 8%) this increases the likelihood of mutual scoring. Based on this I assess BTTS probability at 65% (Yes) and 35% (No).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Oulu scores on average 2.13 goals per match, Gnistan 0.86; xG is 1.63 for Oulu and 1.22 for Gnistan, and combining home attack xG with away defense xG (1.63 + 1.60)/2 yields ~1.62 for Oulu and (1.22 + 1.39)/2 = ~1.30 for Gnistan, totaling ~2.92 goals. Season-long stats show Over 1.5 occurs in 88% of home matches and 71% of away matches, supporting a high probability for Over 1.5 (~79%). Oulu averages 14.5 shots and 5.25 on target with a 15% conversion, while Gnistan has 10.14 shots and 3.57 on target with an 8% conversion, which increases the likelihood of at least two goals in the game. A Poisson model based on expected 1.62 and 1.30 goals gives P(>2.5) ≈56% and P(>3.5) ≈33%, so while Over 2.5 is moderately likely, the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5. Additionally, in the last 5 matches Oulu averaged 0.8 goals scored and 2.0 conceded, and Gnistan averaged 1.4 scored and 1.0 conceded, indicating defensive instability and boosting the value of an Over 1.5 bet.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Statistics clearly favor Oulu: the hosts win 63% of home matches while Gnistan wins only 14% of fixtures; Oulu averages 2.13 goals per game versus Gnistan’s 0.86, and xG is 1.63 against 1.22. At Half-Time Oulu scores an average of 0.75 goals and takes the lead at the break in 38% of matches, whereas Gnistan has 0.43 goals by half-time and leads at the break in only 29% of games — Oulu also has 11 first-half goals versus Gnistan’s 5. The home advantage is further supported by shot and accuracy metrics: 14.5 shots and 5.25 on target for Oulu versus 10.14 and 3.57 for Gnistan, with a conversion rate of 15% vs 8%, which increases Oulu’s chance to take a lead at the break and maintain it. Although a draw at Half-Time is relatively common (38–43% according to both teams’ distributions), the hosts’ superior offensive quality points to a Half-Time lead for Oulu and a Full-Time win; therefore I assign the 1/1 outcome a 26% probability and an additional 23% to X/1. Cumulatively the probability of an Oulu victory (scenarios 1/1, X/1, 2/1) is 58%, hence I select 1/1 as the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Oulu | Gnistan | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Gnistan is 60% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Oulu · 1.6 pts / match - Gnistan
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Gnistan is 15% better for: goals scored per match.
1.33 goals / match - Oulu · 1.53 goals / match - Gnistan
Oulu is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.2 goals / match - Oulu · 1.33 goals / match - Gnistan
Oulu scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while Gnistan keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).
Gnistan scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while Oulu keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Oulu
Over / Under - Gnistan
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Gnistan is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.27 pts / match - Oulu · 1.4 pts / match - Gnistan
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Oulu - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Gnistan - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Oulu
Gnistan
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).
Teams vs league
| Oulu | Liga | Gnistan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.53 | 2.70 | ▲ 2.87 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 47% | 53% | ▼ 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 47% | 48% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 40% | 26% | • 27% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 60% | 75% | ▼ 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 79% | ▲ 93% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Oulu 1 - 0 - 2 Gnistan. Average goals 5.33, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Oulu vs Gnistan?
The Veikkausliiga match finished Oulu 0:2 Gnistan. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Oulu and Gnistan?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Oulu won 1, Gnistan won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Oulu vs Gnistan?
Oulu score 1.33 goals per game on average and Gnistan 1.53. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.70 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Oulu's matches and 47% of Gnistan's.
What form are Oulu and Gnistan in?
Over the last 5 games Oulu have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Gnistan 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Oulu vs Gnistan?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Oulu vs Gnistan: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


